Chapter 6 - The Key Self-Motives: Consistency, Esteem, Presentation, and Growth Flashcards
(99 cards)
Day to day experience - specific things we believe, say, and do - this is self-consistency at the _______ level.
micro
The idea that people don’t like inconsistencies in their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour and they will try to bias their own attitudes and beliefs to deny inconsistencies.
Cognitive dissonance theory
- inconsistency in who i am bad.
when two cognitions contradict or are inconsistent with each other one experiences something called ________ (2).
cognitive DISSONANCE
- eg: i am a peaceful person but i just punched someone in the face -> cognitive dissonance -> why did i do that wtf
3 Ways to reduce dissonance
- change one of the cognitions
- add a third cognition that makes the first 2 cognitions more aligned
- Disregard the importance of all the cognitions - trivialize - “welp it doesn’t even matter fr anyways”
2 dissonance paradigms (laboratory situations):
- Free choice paradigm
- Induced compliance paradigm
Lab situation where people make a choice between 2 options and after that the attraction to either option is assessed (3).
- the idea that the harder it is to make a choice, the more dissonance there will be after the choice was made -> the one i chose has some negative aspects but the one i rejected has some positive aspects :(((
Free choice paradigm
Putting more emphasis on the good aspects of your chosen option and more emphasis on the negatives of your rejected option -> make yourself feel more secure about the choice.
(Related to the free choice paradigm)
spreading the alternatives
High dissonance condition example for yourself in the free choice paradigm.
Low dissonance condition example for yourself in the free choice paradigm.
- would you rather have Chloe or Elisha die -> I’m not gonna think about this right now cause I know it would cause insane dissonance in my head to actually choose one and i would lose it
- do you want an apple or an orange right now
Paying people $20 to tell people hour long boring tasks were fun -> less cognitive dissonance bc legit reward
Vs.
Paying people $1 to tell people hour long boring tasks were fun -> more cognitive dissonance bc $1 is not worth the hour of boredom
Lab exercise called (3):
induced compliance paradigm
A laboratory situation in which participants are induced or motivated to engage in a behaviour that runs counter to their true attitudes.
induced compliance paradigm
Factors that affect the magnitude of dissonance (4):
- Weak external justification -> $20 strong external; $1 weak
- Prescence of perceived choice
- Commitment to action against beliefs
- Foreseeable Aversive Consequences - this is gonna mess something up in the future why am I doing this - like when i said “do it for the plot” - so stupid, idiot
Cultural influences on cognitive dissonance -> group of people who are more cognitive dissonance wise freaked out by PUBLIC displays of inconsistency
collectivistic
Induced hypocrisy paradigm
expected to produce more _______ within the individuals (2).
make people feel bad about preaching and believing in something but being hypocrites to it themselves
cognitive dissonance
inducing hypocrisy in myself:
it sucks that theres such a disparity between the rich and poor some people don’t even have water and yet people in North America use it so frivolously
And the environment bad for the environment
Me i use it too frivolously, i can’t stop taking long hot showers, bruh -> taking shorter showers idiot if you actually care about other people and the way we’re using 1.6 earths every year when we only have one
I suffered for my country
What I suffered for was valuable
(2)
effort justification
Phenomenon where people reduce cognitive dissonance by convincing themselves what they suffered for was valuable (2).
the reward seems better if you put more effort into trying to achieve it
effort justification
- me when i say studying is valuable. In fact i love studying. I love it. So fun.
Frat houses put pledges or whatever they’re called through crazy or embarrassing or difficult initiations to build loyalty. This is due to _________ (2) .
effort justification
Using a minimal level of external justification necessary to deter unwanted behaviour. -> minimal consequence makes it more likely to decrease desire to do something while severe consequence can make the thing seem more special
minimal deterrence
Misattribution of arousal
Self consistency at the macro level consists of
sustaining a sense of self as a unified whole - how we integrate the micro level self concepts into the macro one
Having a clearly defined, internally consistent, temporally stable self-concept
self-concept clarity
Someone who’s identity is molded by the world and whatever people say to her has
a low self-concept clarity
And honestly I think I’ve been changing that soo
Self-verification
seeking out others and social situations that confirm the way they view themselves
- can be extremely good or extremely bad
- extremely good in the way that people with high self-clarity will find people who reinforce that high self-clarity (treat them how they think they deserve)
- but people with low self-clarity like people with identity issues will find people who reinforce that low self-clarity (treat them badly or whatever)
The extent to which an individual’s self-concept consisted of many different aspects.
3 aspects:
self-complexity
- Social roles
- Relationships
- Activities