Chapter two Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

Zimbardo’s study

A

Zimbardo’s study

Prisoners and guards started to act like real prisoners and guards after 6 days and the study had to stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hindsight bias

A

“I-knew-it-all-along”, overestimating your ability to predict an event, after the event outcome is known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The limits of observation

A

Our sense can be fooled

Generalizing observations, assume one situation applies to them all if you’ve observed it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Scientific method:

A
OPTIC
Observe
Predict
Test
Interpret
Communicate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pseudoscience:

A

Pseudoscience: What science is not
Lacks the cumulative progress seen in science
Disregards real world observations and established results
Lacks internal skepticism
Vaguely explains how conclusions are reached
Uses loose and distorted logic
Findings cannot be replicated
Strategy is conformational, very easy to prove the can rather than cannot
Based on testimonials
Non-peer reviewed journals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intellectual Integrity

A

every so often you hear of scientists who have faked studies. We know this because other scientists have tried to replicate their experiment and did not have similar findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Theory:

A

a set of related assumptions from which a scientist can make testable predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Variable

A

Variable: anything that varies or changes between subjects

Ex: age, weight, extraversion, gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample

A

subset of population being sudied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

population

A

: the entire group the researcher is interested in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A single event can inspire new ideas and new lines of research:

A

Woman was attacked, stabbed and later died in an apartment complex, later 38 ppl confessed they heard or saw the attack and did nothing
This sparked two researchers interest and now research in on the “bystander effect” happens all the time today

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Descriptive studies

A

Don’t make any predictions and do not manipulate or control variables
Researchers simply define a problem and describe very carefully the variables of interest
Basic question of descriptive studies: What is the nature of this phenomenon
Researchers make careful observations a lot of time in the real world
Descriptive designs often occur in the exploratory phase of research
Possible relationships and patterns are noted and can be used in other designs as the basis for testable predictions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Three most common types of descriptive studies

A

case studies
naturalistic observation
interview and survey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case study

A

Observation of one person over long period of time
Use detailed descriptions to describe remarkable and rare events
Do not test hypotheses, but can be a source for hypotheses
Allow researchers to study things that are impractical to study any other way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case study example: case of D.S.

A

Example: case of DS
Man suffered head injury in traffic accident
He recovered cognitive abilities
Bu insisted his parents were replaced by doubles - rare symptom of Capgras condition
Interestingly- didn’t treat them as imposters when talking on phone to them, but only when he saw them in person

`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

naturalistic observation

A

Where a researcher unobtrusively observes and records behavior in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Social desirability bias

A

The tendency towards favourable self-presentation that could lead to unreliable data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Correlation designs

A

Is x related to y
We cannot establish whether one variable causes another or vice versa
These different variables could be influenced by a number of things other than the other variable measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Correlation coefficients

A

Stat that goes from -1 to 1
Asses the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables being measured
0 means no relationship
Close to -1 or 1 means relationship strength increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Experimental studies

A

A research design
Two crucial characteristics
Manipulation of predicted cause (independent variable), the measurement of response (dependant variable)
Random asissgnamet of participants to control and experimental group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Placebo

A

A substance or treatment that appears identical to the actual treatment but lacks the active substance

22
Q

Confounding variable

A

An additional variable whose influence cannot be separated from the independent variable being examined (cannot be separated from the variable being manipulated)

23
Q

Single Blind studies

A

When the participants knowledge of the experimental condition affects their behaviours or responses

24
Q

Double-blind studies

A

Double-blind studies
Studies where the participant and the researcher who is administering the study don’t know who has been assigned to which condition (which person in control group and which in experimental group

25
Experimenter expectancy effects
Experimenter expectancy effects | When the knowledge of the experimenter of who is in which condition influences the behaviour of the participants
26
Meta-analysis
A technique where you combine all research results together and draw one conclusion from them all
27
Effect size
A measure of the strength of the relationship of two variables or the magnitude of the experimental effect
28
Operation definitions
Researchers specific definitions of how measure or manipulate variables
29
Measures
Tools or techniques used to assess thought and behavior
30
Measurement scale
Measurement scale | The categories or numbers assigned to each level of a variable
31
Nominal scale
Scale of measurement where the levels of a variable are represented by categories
32
Ordinal scale
Ordinal scale | Numbers are used to rank order levels of a variable
33
Interval scales
Interval scales | The different levels of a variable are assumed to have equal intervals
34
Ratio scale
Ratio scale | Variable represented by a numeric scale that has equal intervals and an absolute zero point
35
Goal of physiological data
Goal of physiological data: reliable and valid data
36
Reliability
Reliable: consistency of results
37
Validity
how well/ accurately your measure assesses the psychological quality you're trying to measure
38
Psychological measure fall into three categories:
self report, behavioral (systematic observation of organisms actions or activities in their normal or laboratory environment) and physiological (provides data on bodily responses)
39
Descriptive statistics:
Descriptive statistics: methods used to describe and summarize research data
40
Frequency distribution:
Frequency distribution: a graph of how many times a variable was scores
41
Inferential statistics:
stats calculated on sample data to make conclusions about populations
42
T-test:
T-test: type of inferential statistic that tests for differences between means
43
Statistical significance:
what we call the result when the t-test says our findings are real, not just random
44
Significance level:
the standard used to determine statistical significance
45
Ethics:
standards of right and wrong…. Or …..the rules governing the conduct of a person or group in general or in a specific situation
46
Milgram's experiment:
Milgram's experiment: Milgram was interested with the war Wondered to what extend psychological factors influenced people's willingness to to carry out orders made by the nazi regime Testing whether decent people could be made to inflict harm on other people Mislead participants about true nature of experiment, they thought it was about learning Participants administers electric shocks to "learner" in other room Shock strength went up but the participants/ "teachers" were pressured to continue shocking the "learners" Most people continued shocking. Afterwards we find out no one was shocked or harmed Proved how easily good people could be persuaded to hurt others But was it ethical????
47
Ethical research with humans
1) Informed consent 2) Respect for persons (safeguard the dignity and autonomy of people and take extra precautions when dealing with people, ex: children, who don't understand as clearly that their participation is voluntary 3) Beneficence (inform participants of cost and benefits of study) 4) Privacy and confidentiality 5) Justice (benefits and cost must be distributed equally among participants. Participants should come from wide variety of social groups. Groups should only be excluded where scientifically justifiable
48
Is deception in a study ethical?
- Always avoidable but can be permitted if it meets certain conditions - 1) Justified by its scientific potential - 2) Part of research design - 3) No alternative to deception - 4) Full debriefing afterwards
49
What makes sure ethic guidelines are followed?
Research ethics board
50
Ethical research with animals:
In Canada, all research involving animals must pass the guidelines made by the Canadian council on Animal care