Child Issues and Debates Flashcards
(36 cards)
Ethical
Li et al (2013)
did not assign children to different types of daycare arrangement
Parents made choice then Li et al studied consequences
if daycare caused problems Li et al was not responsible
Unethical
Genie
Over-tested and abandoned when research funding ran out
Some researchers said they put their career ambitions before the welfare of the child, bringing their integrity into question and caused damage to the reputation of Psychology as a subject
Classical study of ethics
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
Had no direct contact with participants
Normal issues don’t apply (consent, right to withdraw etc)
Strange situation test, caregivers are not deceived and gave their informed consent.
Babies are only temporarily upset from procedure
Reductionistic
Ainsworth
Claimed maternal sensitivity was the sole reason of attachment type
which was an over-simplification
Infant temperament and maternal sensitivity interact to produce attachment (Fuertes et al, 2006)
Holistic
Research into the effectiveness of daycare
considers a wide range of complex mediational factors including quality of daycare, family background, disposition of the child, etc
Li et al (2013) example
Classic study of reductionism
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
many different types of attachment as there are mothers and babies yet Ainsworth’s strange situation test reduces attachment down to one of three types.
Comparing whole cultures is also reductionistic once you realise that within culture variations are 1.5x as big as between culture variations.
Nature
Bowlby’s theory of attachment
claimed we have evolved to want to stay close to our mothers so we can learn from them and so they can keep us safe.
His theory refutes the cupboard love hypothesis (we love food and we learn to associate mum with food).
BUT
Harlow & Zimmerman (1959) proved the cupboard love hypothesis wrong.
Nurture
Cross-cultural research into attachment shows that secure attachment is the most common in all cultures (nature)
However, there are significant variations between (and within!) cultures in terms of the proportion of different attachment types.
This suggests child-rearing practices in different (sub)cultures make a difference (nurture).
BUT
Fuertes at al (2006) would disagree
Nature vs Nurture classic study
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
secure attachments were the most popular in all cultures.
universality suggests nature is at work. Nurture only seems to play a role in how it goes wrong when it goes wrong.
Some cultures seem to mess up attachments primarily by making their children anxious avoidant. Some do it by primarily making their children anxious resistant.
Use of Psychology in social control (example 1)
Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis was used by the British government to “guilt-trip” thousands of women back into their homes once they were no longer needed in the fields / factories after WW2.
Use of Psychology in social control (example 2)
Applied Behavioural Analysis uses the principles of operant conditioning to force children with autism to behave in what we deem to be socially acceptable ways. Is this for their benefit or our benefit?
Classic study of Use of Psychology in social control
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
Ainsworth claimed that the mother was wholly responsible for the attachment type between her and her child
van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg’s research could be used to pressure mothers from certain cultures to raise their children differently.
Use of Psychological Knowledge in Society (example 1) - strength
Research into the short-term effects of deprivation (e.g. James and Joyce Robertson) resulted in changes to hospital visiting practices in the 1950’s.
there are strict staff-to-child ratios in nurseries and guidance in place re; “key-workers” to make sure all children have a substitute primary caregiver.
Reducing any effect of short-term deprivation brought on by day care.
Use of Psychological Knowledge in Society (example 2) - weakness
Understanding autism has helped us to develop treatments.
Children with autism are able to distinguish thoughts, feelings, and behaviours, and to work on altering their thoughts, which are all skills required within CBT.
However, they often have difficulty in recognising emotions and working with hypothetical or abstract thoughts.
CBT for those with autism places greater emphasis on repetition and visual cues.
Classic study for Use of Psychological Knowledge in Society
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
research indicated that there was greater variance in attachment types WITHIN countries than between them
When this happens it is socioeconomic status (i.e. poverty) that is driving it. As such, governments should help accordingly (e.g. set up / fund “Sure Start Centres”).
Scientific
Baron-Cohen et al’s (1985)
research into autism (Sally-Anne test) is highly scientific
Has a specific testable hypothesis that is falsifiable and the study gathers empirical data
has great control over extraneous variables (e.g. the use of children with Down’s Syndrome as a control group to rule out differences in ToM just being down to intellectual disabilities).
Unscientific
Research into the effects of institutional care (e.g Hodges & Tizard, 1989) have poor internal validity because of a lack of control over EVs.
Comparing outcomes for adopted children vs those left behind in institutions fails to recognise that the children who were chosen
for adoption may have been more socially adept and emotionally stable to begin with.
Psychology as a science classic study
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
SSP is highly standardised and controlled and the study analysed quantitative data BUT the overall conclusions are really quite subjective
(e.g. the media has spread Western values about raising children which is why secure attachment is the most prevalent in the world!).
No control over the way the original studies were conducted. More inductive than deductive (no specific, testable hypothesis).
Practical issues research method
The observational research method is used extensively in child psych (usually because it would be unethical to perform a laboratory experiment; e.g. on neglect).
Naturalistic (high EV, low R) vs structured (vice versa). Overt (ethical) vs covert (no demand characteristics). Participant (depth but no breadth) vs non-participant (vice versa).
Practical issues piece of research
Ainsworth’s “strange situation test” is the most famous example of a structured observation.
Extremely reliable because extraneous variables are well controlled (always the same 8 stages in the same order).
However, lacks EV because the artificial environment may upset the child and make them unusually tearful / clingy.
Practical issues classic study
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
Meta-analysis => File-drawer effect
unpublished findings may have altered the results / conclusions of the study.
Population validity should have been high as they looked at a wide range of countries but in truth it was skewed
18 of the studies were from the USA and only 1 study was from China (featuring 36 children).
Culture issue weakness (example 1)
Li et al (2013)
only interested in American daycare and looked at 1364 families from 10 sample sites around North America.
teenage mothers (an important sub-cultural group) and low birth weight babies were excluded from the study
the response rate for the 6 month interview was only 50% and biased towards economically advantaged white families.
Culture issue - strength (example 2)
Cross-cultural research into attachment can lead to ethnocentric conclusions
German mums neglect their children; Japanese mums are relatively inconsistently emotionally available, etc). This is because the SST doesn’t always travel well.
However, the SST does travel well in Sagi et al (1984)
there really are more anxious-resistant attachments in Israel because of the strange childcare arrangements in a kibbutzim.
Culture issues classic study
Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988)
should be the least culturally biased and ethnocentric of all the classic studies, because it was a cross-cultural study that examined a broad range of cultures.
BUT
there was a bias in the cultures sampled; 18 of 32 studies were from the USA and only 1 study was from China (36 children)
More urban than rural. Biased towards middle-class families.