Clinical Issues and Debates Flashcards
(36 cards)
Ethical
Guardia et al (2012) chose not to have the P’s judge the body size of another anorexic individual. Even though this would have been good methodologically, it may have caused psychological harm to the woman being judged. Tenn et al (2003) was an ethical way to study the dopamine hypothesis (injecting rats with amphetamines); causing temporary psychosis in humans would be way too risky.
Unethical
Clinical trials are essential for testing the effectiveness of drugs / therapies but they have ethical issues. The P’s are vulnerable people and may not be able to give informed consent. In single or double-blind drug trials, some patients are being given a placebo, which means that they are not receiving any treatment at all.
Ethics classic study
Rosenhan (1973): Psychiatric institutions were deceived, which then has downstream consequences for informed consent, right to withdraw, etc. Rosenhan sought permission for himself, but not the other pseudopatients. May have harmed real patients by wasting the time of the doctors and nurses. Doctors and nurses were kept anonymous, but may have lost faith in their abilities.
Reductionistic (bad)
The dopamine hypothesis is a reductionistic explanation of schizophrenia. It explains a disorder that has many complex features by using the smallest possible “unit” of explanation. It ignores the complex interrelationship between various neurotransmitter levels and also ignores social or environmental factors.
Holistic (good)
Family therapy is holistic as it recognises the importance of communication and relationships with family as a mediating factor in triggering a relapse of mental illness. It doesn’t just focus on one component of mental illness but instead looks at wider factors such as social / emotional / family support and communication.
Reductionism and holism classic study
Rosenhan (1973): The medical model employed by the DSM II was reductionistic in its approach to MHDs. Having a checklist approach to diagnosing people (i.e. a list of symptoms) was arguably what allowed the pseudopatients to get into the mental hospitals with just a single symptom (hearing the words “empty / hollow / thud”). Study gathered a wide range of data though (qual. + quant.) so holistic.
Nature
There is a strong biological basis for schizophrenia. Gottesman (1991) found that concordance for MZ twins was 48% whilst for DZ it was only 17%. This indicates a strong genetic component (although not 100% concordance for MZ so obviously environment plays a role; diathesis-stress model). The dopamine hypothesis ignores the influence of outside factors entirely.
Nurture
The sociocultural explanation of anorexia is very much on the side of nurture. Anorexia is more likely to occur in social and /or cultural groups that place a greater emphasis on the ideal that “slim is beautiful”. For example, Hoek et al (2005) found that the incidence of anorexia was much lower on the island of Curacao where it is seen as culturally acceptable to be overweight.
Nature vs nurture classic study
Rosenhan (1973): Abnormality was defined by the DSM at the time in terms of violating certain societal norms, as opposed to being based on any kind of physical testing (e.g. brain function). If societal norms vary from place-to-place, then whether you are considered abnormal will also vary from place-to-place. Thus, culture has an effect on the diagnosis of mental disorders (nurture).
Use of psychology in social control - electronvulsive therapy
Electroconvulsive therapy is sometimes given to people with severe unipolar depression; they often can’t give their consent because they are so depressed. Passing a current through their temples causes a violent seizure (so much so that patients have to be restrained and given muscle relaxants or they injure themselves). It can stabilise mood disorders but many consider it barbaric.
Use of psychology in social control - giving drugs
In the 1970’s in-patients with schizophrenia were often given typical antipsychotic drugs for their condition. This was not because those drugs were so successful at treating the condition, but because a side effect was that it sedated patients and made them easier to manage. These drugs are consequently known as pharmacological straightjackets.
Use of psychology for social control - classic study
Rosenhan (1973): Being labelled with a MHD has long been a form of social control (e.g. drapetomania, homosexuality, etc). This is evident in Rosenhan’s study; the pseudopatients had to accept the psychiatrists’ view of them before they were let out (e.g. “I was crazy but I’m better now”).
The Use of Psychological Knowledge in Society - dopamine hypothesis
The dopamine hypothesis inspired dopamine antagonists as a treatment for schizophrenia. Likewise, research such as Carlsson et al (2000) may lead the way to better drugs in the future. These drugs will attempt to modulate glutamate to more effectively treat the disorder.
The Use of Psychological Knowledge in Society - biological explanation of an
Biological explanations of anorexia have changed society’s view of the disorder to one that is more compassionate and less a case of “why don’t you just eat?”. In a landmark legal ruling, US health insurance companies now have to pay out to anorexia sufferers because it is a legitimate medical condition and not self-inflicted as they had previously claimed.
The Use of Psychological Knowledge in Society - classic study
Rosenhan (1973): His research helped the psychiatric community recognise that their diagnostic system was flawed and in need of revision. It also improved how patients were treated within mental hospitals.
scientific
Before a drug can be prescribed for a MHD such as schizophrenia, it needs to be passed for use. Research into the effectiveness of drugs involves large scale, double-blind, randomised control trials. The drug has to be proven to be better at reducing symptoms than a placebo and all possible side effects must be well recognised. As a result of their methodology, drug trials are highly scientific.
unscientific
Research into the effectiveness of treatments / therapies can be rendered unscientific by “treatment bias”. This is where participation in a treatment programme is decided upon by clinicians, with only those people best suited to the intervention being put forward for it (e.g. family therapy for schizophrenia). As such, participants are not randomly allocated to conditions, which reduces internal validity.
Psychology as a science classic study
Rosenhan (1973): Not all pseudopatients followed the standardised procedure so therefore it lacks control. Some of the measures were objective (e.g. admitted or not? Length of stay, number of minutes that doctors spoke to them per day). Other measures were subjective and were likely to be biased due to the pseudopatients being trapped. Hypothesis was specific, testable and falsifiable though.
Practical issues research method interviews
Interviews are a popular research method in clinical psychology (esp. when diagnosing MHDs). Clinical interviews are usually semi-structured so the patient can tell their story but at the same time the clinician is forced to ask the right questions (e.g. to help them discover whether the patient’s social withdrawal is because of depression or schizophrenia). Normal problems with self-report though (e.g. SDB).
Practical issues piece of research
Vallentine at al (2010) used semi-structured interviews with 42 males detained in Broadmoor high security hospital to understand their experiences as part of a psycho-educational group treatment programme. Study was more valid because the patients could fully explain their point of view, but was less reliable because the questions were not fully standardised.
Practical issues classic study
Rosenhan (1973): High population validity thanks to the good sample (range of hospital types, ages and funding methods, across 5 different states). Observers may have been biased because they were trapped though. Rosenhan claimed that the pseudopatients only showed one symptom but this was not true (also nervous and asked to be admitted).
Culture issues guardia
Guardia et al (2012) looked at 25 female patients with eating disorders, all from a clinic in Lille, France, yet the research draws conclusions about anorexia sufferers in general. As such, this research is culturally biased (towards France).
Culture issues race and culture in diganosing
Race and culture can be issues in terms of the diagnosis of MHDs. Littlewood and Lipsedge (1997) have suggested that the reason why black and Irish people in Britain are more likely than others to receive a diagnosis of serious mental disorder has more to do with bias in the system than a genuine greater vulnerability in those groups (e.g. the case of Calvin).
Culture issues classic study
Rosenhan (1973): Wide range of American psychiatric institutions sampled (different funding methods, old and new hospitals, across 5 states), so it generalises well to this particular culture. However, the findings are unlikely to apply outside of the USA, so it is culturally biased. Then again the study was supposed to address flaws in the DSM, which was mainly used in America at the time.