Class, power and crime Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

Give comparisons between marxism and labelling theory

A

Marxists are similar to labelling theorists as they both argue that the law is enforced disproportionately against the working class and therefore official crime statistics cannot be taken at face-value. However, they differ as Marxists criticise labelling theory for failing to examine the wider structure of capitalism within which law making, law enforcement and offending take place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What three main elements does marxists’ view of crime involve?

A

Criminogenic capitalism, the state and law making, ideological functions of crime and law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is capitalism criminogenic?

A

By its very nature it causes crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does capitalism’s effect on the working class give rise to crime?

A

Poverty may mean that crime is the only way that the working class can survive, crime may be the only way that they can obtain consumer goods encouraged by capitalist advertising, alienation and lack of control over their lives may lead to frustration and aggression, resulting in non-utilitarian crimes such as violence and vandalism. Alienation and lack of control over their lives may lead to frustration and aggression, resulting in non-utilitarian crimes such as violence and vandalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Gordan say about crime within capitalist societies?

A

Crime is a rational response to the capitalist system and hence it is found in all social classes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Chambliss say about the state and law making?

A

Laws to protect private property are the cornerstone of the capitalist economy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does Chambliss support his view about the state and law making?

A

The case of the introduction of english law into britain’s east African colonies
Britan’s economic interests lay in the colonies’ tea, coffee and other plantations, which needed a plentiful supply of local labour. The british introduced a tax payable in cash, non-payment of which is punishable criminal offence. The ruling class also have the power to prevent the introduction of laws that would threaten interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does Snider support Chambliss’ view of the state and law making

A

the capitalist state is reluctant to pass laws that regulate the activities of businesses or threaten their profitability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does Pierce argue about the ideological functions of crime and law

A

when laws are passed that appear to benefit the working class rather than capitalism, such laws benefit the ruling class too. For example, keeping workers fit for work by giving capitalism a caring face - such laws create a false consciousness among the workers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

give five criticisms of marxism

A

largely ignores relationship between crime and non-class inequalities such as ethnicity and gender
too deterministic and over-predicts the amount of crime in the working class - not all poor people commit crime despite the pressures of poverty
not all capitalist societies have high crime rates - the homicide rate in japan and switzerland is about 1/5 of that in the united states.
The criminal justice system sometimes acts against the interests of the capitalist class for example, prosecution of corporate crimes
left realists argue that the marxism ignores intra-class crimes such as burglary and mugging which cause great harm to victicms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does taylor et al agree with marxists? (Taylor, walton and young)

A

capitalist society is based on exploitation and class conflict and characterised by extreme inequalities of wealth and power.
the state makes and enforces laws in the interests of the capitalist class and criminalises members of the working class
Capitalism should be replaced by a classless society. This would greatly reduce the extent of crime or even rid society of crime entirely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Anti-determinism

A

taylor et al argue that marxism is deterministic
they take a more voluntaristic view - the idea that we have free will - the opposite of determinism
they see crime as meaningful action and a conscious choice by the actor.
They argue that crime often has a political motive.
criminals are not passive puppets whose behaviour is shaped by capitalism. - they are deliberately striving to change society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain the fully social theory of deviance

A

taylor et al
a comprehensive understanding of crime and deviance that would help to change society for the better.
This would have two main sources:
- marxist ideas about the unequal distribution of wealth and who has the power to make and reinforce the law
- ideas from interactionism and labelling theory about the meaning of the deviant act for the actor, societal reactions to it and the effects of the deviant label on the individual.
A complete theory needs to unite six aspects:
- the wider origins of the deviant act
- the immediate origins of the deviant act
- the act itself
- the immediate origins of social reaction
- the wider origins of social reaction
- the effects of labelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A

left realist - critical criminology romanticises working class criminals as robin hoods who are fighting capitalism by redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor. However, in reality these criminals mostly prey on the poor

Left realist - taylor et al do not take crime seriously and they ignore its effects on working class victims

roger hopkins burke - critical criminology is both too general to explain crime and too idealistic to be useful in tackling crime. However, stuart et al have applied taylor et al’s approach to explain the moral panic over mugging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how does sutherland define white collar crime

A

a crime committed by a person of respectability and high status in the course of their occupation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

differentiate between occupational crime and corporate crime

A

occupational - committed by employees for personal gain
corporate - committed by employees in pursuit of the goals of the occupation

17
Q

how do pierce and tombs widen the definition of corporate crime

A

an illegal act of omission that is the result of deliberate decisions or culpable negligence by legitimate business organisations and that is intended to benefit the business.

18
Q

give the five types of corporate crime

A

financial crime - tax evasion, bribery, money laundering
Crimes against consumers - false labelling, selling unfit goods
crimes against employees - sexual and racial discrimination, violations of wage laws, rights to join a union or take industrial actions.
crimes against the environment - illegal pollution of air, water, land
State corporate crime - harms committed when government institutions and businesses cooperate to pursue goals

19
Q

what three harms does Tombs argue is brought about through corporate crime

A

physical harm
environmental harm
economic harm

20
Q

what does Carrabine et al argue about corporate crime?

A

we entrust high status individuals with our finances, health, security, and iyr personal info but they can abuse this trust.

21
Q

explain how the media may make corporate crime invisible

A

limited coverage to corporate crime reinforces the stereotype that crime is a working class phenomenon and they describe corporate crime using sanitized language.

22
Q

explain how a lack of political will may make corporate crime invisible

A

politician’s rhetoric of being tough on crime is focused only on street crime. Crimes are often complex and law enforcers are often under-staffed, under resourced and lacking technical expertise

23
Q

explain how de-labelling may make crime invisible including the HSBC case study

A

offences are often defined as civil rather than criminal. Penalties are often fines rather than jail.
in 2010, French authorities provided British counterparts with a list of 3600 UK citizens holding secret bank accounts. Accounts were believed to be a means of evading tax but UK tax authorities secured one prosecution and no action was taken against the HSBC.

24
Q

explain how corporate crime has become more visible

A

since the financial crisis 2008, activities of a range of people may have made corporate crime more visible. For example, campaigns against tax avoidance such as occupy

25
explain the relationship between strain theory and corporate crime
box applied merton's concept of innovation to explain how if a company cannot achieve goals, it will employ illegal ones instead. Clinard and Yeager - law violations by large companies increased financial performance
26
explain the relationship between differential association and corporate crime
sutherland - behaviour learned by others in social context Gies - individuals joining companies where illegal price fixing was practiced became part of it as a part of socialisation. deviant subculture
27
explain the relationship between labelling theory and corporate crime
Nelken - delabelling - coined the term businesses and professionals have the power to avoid labelling reluctance / inability of law enforcement agencies to investigate / prosecute reduces number of offences officially recorded
28
explain the relationship between marxism and corporate crime
capitalism's goal is to maximise profits and inevitably causes harm Box - creates mystification - ideology that corporate crime is less harmful / widespread than w/c crime pearce - sustains illusion that it is the exception rather than harm