classic study: rosenhan 1973 Flashcards

1
Q

what was the name of Rosenhan’s study?

A

being sane in insane places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

state the 2 aims of the study

A
  • identify if 8 sane people who gained admission to 12 different hospitals would be found out as sane
  • identify the experience of being in an institution was like and what it feels like to be viewed as insane
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

describe the sample of study 1

A
  • 8 pseudopatients
  • male and female
  • occupations: painter, pediatrician, psychiatrist, 3 psychologists, housewife , psychology graduate student
  • psych backgrounds alleged alternate occupations to avoid special treatment from staff
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describe the hospitals in the sample of study 1

A
  • 12
  • 5 different states on east and west coast
  • some old, some new
  • some research orientated
  • some understaffed
  • 1 private
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

describe the procedure in study 1

A
  • claimed to hear an unfamiliar, same sex voice saying ‘empty, hollow, thud’
  • life histories / previous experiences remained true
  • ceased all symptoms upon admission and told staff they were ‘fine’
  • brief period of anxiety upon admission
  • made notes about staff/patients, started privately but then left in public places eg day room
  • all but 1 desired to be discharged immediately
  • 7-52 days with 19 days avrg
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what 3 characteristics did nursing reports indicate that pseudopatients had?

A
  • friendly
  • co operative
  • exhibited no abnormal indications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what diagnosis were they discharged with?

A

schizophrenia in remission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

who suspected the sanity of the pseudopatients?

A
  • other patients
  • ‘you’re not crazy, you’re a journalist or professor checking up on the hospital’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describe the findings

A
  • nurse reports
  • patients detected sanity
  • type 1 false positive which errs on side of caution, identifying a healthy person as insane
  • 35/118 real patients voted suspicions
  • nurses spent 11.3% of time outside cage
  • experienced depersonalisation = physical abuse in front of them, no privacy, physical exam in public room, no eye contact, over reliance on medication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how much of the medication was swallowed by pseudopatients?

A

2/2100

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

state the aim of study 2

A

see if tendency toward diagnosing the sane could be reversed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

describe the sample of study 2

A

research teaching hospital who had heard of findings of study 1 and doubted an error would occur for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

describe the procedure of study 2

A
  • staff informed that during following 3 months, 1 or more pseudopatients would attempt to be admitted
  • staff rated each patient on 10 point scale with 1 being high confidence that they were a pseudopatient
  • judgements obtained on 193 patients
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

describe the results of study 2

A
  • 41 alleged with high confidence
  • 23 considered by 1 psychiatrist
  • 19 suspected by 1 psychiatrist and 1 other staff member
  • no genuine pseudopatient was presented
  • tendency to designate sane people as insane can be reversed when stakes are high
  • diagnostic process is unreliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Asch say about central personality colouring formation of impressions? how does this link to the study?

A
  • powerful traits colour meaning of other information to form an impression of a given personality
  • once a person is designated abnormal, other behaviours are tainted by this label
  • pseudopatients normal behaviour is overlooked entirely due to the diagnosis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what did nurses perceive note taking behaviour as?

A
  • pathological behaviour
  • continuous writing must be a manifestation of pathological disturbance
17
Q

what did staff regard sitting out
side the cafeteria 30 mins prior to lunch time as?

A

characteristic of oral acquisitive nature of the syndrome

18
Q

how many times did nurses emerge from the cage during a shift?

A

11.5x

19
Q

evaluate the study in terms of generalisability

A

strength
- range of ppt sample and 12 hospitals with different characteristics and locations
- representative of psychiatric hospitals in different parts of america
- representative of diff types of people / occupations

weakness
- ethnocentric
- not representative of diagnosis and psychiatric hospitals in different cultures/countries

20
Q

evaluate the study in terms of reliability

A

strength
- standardised procedures of symptoms and behaviour upon admission
- can be replicated

strength
- study 2 quant data
- rated on a scale
- can easily be replicated

strength
- 11/12 diagnoses consistent which makes DSM reliable but not valid

weakness
- lack standardised procedures
- graduate requested psych hw, romantic relationship

21
Q

evaluate the study in terms of application

A

strength
- impact on mental health care
- reviewing admission procedures
- training staff on patient interaction
- the study is a compulsory part of training in psychiatric care
- DSM II –> DSM III
- prevents false admission & misdiagnoses

22
Q

evaluate the study in terms of validity

A

strength
- high ecological
- staff unaware so natural behaviour
- reflects staff treatment of normal patients in psychiatric hospitals

weakness
- low internal
- faking mental illness
- doesn’t represent how genuine mental conditions are diagnosed

weakness
- low internal
- 9th pseudopatient had positive experience but wasn’t included in report
- publication bias

23
Q

evaluate the study in terms of ethics

A

weakness
- ethical issues
- pseudopatients were not reminded of right to withdraw
- hospital staff deceived
- other patients and staff could not consent

weakness
- admitting sane patients takes time away from other patients
- however, only 11.3% of time was spent outside cage for nurses?

weakness
- false labels
- could lead to SFP
- medicated and depersonalised
- however, fake name used so label won’t affect real life