research methods: primary & secondary data Flashcards

1
Q

describe primary data

A
  • gathered by researcher
  • directly from ppts
  • gives data unique to aim of research
  • eg clinical interviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

describe secondary data

A
  • relies on evidence from other researchers
  • eg assessing peer reviewed articles or public access statistics
  • eg from hospital records
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a clinical example of primary / secondary data?

A

goldstein
- primary = interview using DSM III for sz, assessed severity of symptoms & daily functioning
- secondary = hospital records, detail history, number of hospitalisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the strength of using both primary & secondary data?

A
  • high validity as rich & in depth
  • increases validity as looking for consistency across methods/studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evaluate primary data for practicality

A

weaknesses
- expensive
- equipment required
- data gathered at time of study so specific to the time

strengths
- researchers follow study all the way through
- ensure sound methodology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluate secondary data for practicality

A

strengths
- gathers suitable info quickly
- cheaper as data already exists

weaknesses
- data may be outdated = cohort effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

evaluate primary data for validity

A

strengths
- researcher has control over methodology so data can be collected specifically for the aim
- considers whether findings are applicable to real life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

evaluate secondary data for validity

A

strengths
- old data can be used to look at change over time

weaknesses
- gathered for another purpose
- already analysed = subjective
- may be missing what researcher is interested in
- may not have valid methodology
- publication bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evaluate primary data for credibility

A

strengths
- more trustworthy
- data collected objectively
- controls in place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

evaluate secondary data for credibility

A

lacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluate primary data for reliability

A

strengths
- data collected in real time so events can be tracked easily & progress monitored closely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

evaluate secondary data for reliability

A

weaknesses
- may be less relevant for the aim
- flaws in standardised procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evaluate primary data for ethics

A

researchers have control so can gain informed consent & ensure right to withdraw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

evaluate secondary data for ethics

A

previous data may not have ethical studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly