Classification Scheme for Periodontal & Peri-Implant Diseases Flashcards

1
Q

The periodontitis Armitage 1999 states that the severity of disease is based upon:

A

clinical attachment level (gold standard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The periodontitis Armitage 1999 states that the severity of disease is based upon clinical attachment level (gold standard)

Slight:
Moderate:
Severe:

A

Slight: 1-2 mm
Moderate: 3-4mm
Severe: >= 5mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The periodontitis Armitage 1999 states that the severity of disease is based upon clinical attachment level (gold standard)

________: 1-2mm
________: 3-4mm
________: greater than or equal to 5mm

A

Slight: 1-2mm
Moderate: 3-4mm
Severe: greater than or equal to 5mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the PRIMARY cause of tooth loss in the US population over the age of 30?

A

Periodontitis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

With the 1999 classification of periodontal diseases and conditions, why was there concern with the categories chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis?

A

there was not enough evidence that they were two different entities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In simple terms what’s it mean if you have periodontitis?

A

attachment loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What can cause pseudo pockets?

A

gingival hyperplasia due to medications, genetic diseases etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Attachment loss can be measured via:

A

radiographic bone loss & probing depths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If there is no attachment loss there is no _____ because its not ____

A

staging & grading; periodontitis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Few practitioners use _____ routinely

A

clinical attachment level (CAL)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AAP formed a task force in 2015 to identify alternative criteria including:

A
  1. radiographic bone loss (RBL)
  2. probing depth (PD)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

T/F: A 6mm probing depth with 20% bone loss is significantly different that 6 mm with 75% bone loss

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Probing depth is not considered:

A

diagnostic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Probing depth is not considered diagnostic because: (2)

A
  1. Inflammation has effect on penetration of probe into tissue
  2. Inflammation (swelling) may move gingival margin coronally (pseudo pocket)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When inflammation moves the gingival margin coronally:

A

pseudopocket

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In regard to the 2015 task force guidelines, the 2017 workshop recommended: (2)

A
  1. use interproximal attachment loss (2 or more non-adjacent teeth)
  2. use probing depth as a “complexity” factor (difficulty of treatment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How do you use attachment loss?

A

Use two sites that are not next to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The 2017 classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions new classification is based on strongest:

A

current evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The 2017 classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions developed a ______ system that is:

A

adaptive system; 3 dimensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The 2017 classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions adaptive system (3 dimensional) takes into account: (3)

A
  1. severity/extent (number of teeth affected rather than sites)
  2. prognosis (affects no teeth, up to 4 teeth, 5 or more teeth)
  3. progression (grading)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

answer to something: Plaque in a susceptible host

basically was discussing about if he gave each of us a spoonful of plaque (ew) why we would all not have the same response

22
Q

Periodontal disease is an _____ disease

A

inflammatory

23
Q

Approximately _____ % of adults over the age of 30 years old have periodontitis and this is the primary cause of tooth loss in adults

24
Q

What is the primary cause of tooth loss in adults?

A

periodontitis

25
What categories of people show a greater percentage of periodontitis?
- Men - Mexican Americans - Adults below the 100% federal poverty level - current smokers - self reported diabetics
26
Three steps to staging and grading a patient Step 1:
Initial case overview to assess disease
27
Three steps to staging and grading a patient Step 1: Initial case overview to assess disease Screening involves:
1. full mouth probing depths 2. full mouth radiographs 3. missing teeth
28
Mild to moderate periodontitis will typically be either:
stage I or stage II
29
Clinical attachment loss of 1-2mm is stage:
Stage I
30
Clinically attachment loss of 3-4mm is stage:
Stage II
31
Three steps to staging and grading a patient Step 2:
Establish stage
32
When establishing a stage (step 2) for mild to moderate periodontitis (typically stage I or stage II), what else are you determining during this step?
- confirm clinical attachment loss (CAL) - rule out non-periodontitis causes of CAL (e.g. cervical restorations or caries, root fractures, CAL due to traumatic causes) - Determine maximum CAL or radiographic bone loss - Confirm RBL patterns
33
For moderate to severe periodontitis these guys are typically:
Stage III or IV
34
When establishing a stage (step 2) for moderate to severe periodontitis (typically stage III or stage IV), what else are you determining during this step?
- determine maximum CAL or RBL - confirm RBL patterns - assess tooth loss due to periodontitis - evaluate case complexity factors (e.g. severe CAL frequency, surgical challenges)
35
Three steps to staging and grading a patient Step 3:
Establish grade
36
What should be done in step 3- establishing the grade of the patient?
- calculate RBL (% of root length x 100) divided by age - assess risk factors (such as smoking or diabetes) - measure response to scaling and root planing and plaque control - assess expected rate of bone loss - conduct detailed risk assessment - account for medical and systemic inflammatory considerations
37
According to the AAP 2017 classification, in regards to staging and grading: Every patient categorized based on the _______ periodontal site and specific factors that may impact long term management
WORST
38
According the the AAP 2017 classification, staging is divided into:
1. severity 2. complexity 3. extend and distribution
39
Classify the following stages- Stage 1: Stage 2: Stage 3: Stage 4:
Stage 1: Initial Stage 2: Moderate Stage 3: Severe with potential for additional tooth loss Stage 4: Severe with potential for loss of dentition
40
Staging 1-4 is based upon:
severity of disease and complexity of case management
41
What should be taken into consideration when staging?
1. Clinical attachment loss (CAL) - USING WORST SITE 2. Amount and % of bone loss 3. Probing depth 4. Presence/extend of ridge defects and furcation involvement 5. Tooth mobility 6. Tooth loss (due to periodontitis if known)
42
Criteria for Defining Periodontitis:
- Interdental clinical attachment loss at 2 or more NON-ADJACENT teeth OR - Buccal or oral clinical attachment loss of > or = 3mm with a) pocketing of greater than 3 mm b) on 2 or more teeth
43
According to the New staging guidelines using interproximal CAL; a CAL of 1-2 mm would classify someone as:
Stage I
44
According to the New staging guidelines using interproximal CAL; a CAL of 3-4 mm would classify someone as:
Stage II
45
According to the New staging guidelines using interproximal CAL; a CAL of greater than equal to 5mm would classify someone as:
Stage III or IV
46
CAUTION: Ensure the problem cannot be attributed to non-periodontal causes such as:
1. Gingival recession- due to trauma (toothbrush trauma/toothpaste abrasion) 2. Dental caries- extending to or below the gingival margin 3. Defect on distal of 2nd molars caused by malposition or extraction of a 3rd molar 4. Endodontic lesion-draining through marginal periodontium (deep probing depth) 5. Vertical root fracture (usually isolated deep probing depth)
47
Complexity: 1. Takes into account ____ 2. Evaluates ____ 3. Evaluates ____
1. overall probing depths 2. radiographic bone loss, horizontal and vertical 3. furcation involvements, number of missing teeth, function
48
When considering staging and grading for periodontitis, factors to consider include all EXCEPT: - smoking - diabetes - attachment level - bleeding on probing
- bleeding on probing because this is just a sign of inflammation
49
Prognosis based upon staging and tooth loss Stage I or II =
No tooth loss likely
50