COGNITIVE APPROACH- Andrade (DOODLING) Flashcards

1
Q

describe the background of the study

A
  • daydreaming is linked to boredom
  • arousal levels need to be maintained to be able to concentrate
  • boredom plays a role in paying attention to info
  • it has been assumed that concurrent tasks disrupt our concentration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the psychology being investigated

A

prior to the study it was unknown whether the act of doodling impair attention processes by taking resources from the primary task or aiding concentration
- multitasking can act as a distractor
- dual tasks may compete for the same levels of performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the aim

A

Test whether doodling while listening aids in concentration in a boring task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the 4 features of the. sample

A

-40 participants
-all from the applied psychology unit panel
-18-55 years
-paid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What sampling method was used here

A

Opportunity sampling- she took advantage of the fact that they were already available and decided to use that to also instigate boredom or fatigue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the recording of the telephone in the experiment

A
  • monotonous tone
  • was played at a comfortable volume
  • Mentioned 8 people who will attend the party plus 3 people and one cat who will not be attending as well as 8 locations in the UK
  • played for 2.5 mins
  • 227 words per minute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the IVs of the study

A

-doodling and control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how were the materials standardised for the doodling group

A

-10 shapes per row
-alternated between squares and circles
-shapes were 1 cm in diameter on an A4 piece of paper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how was counterbalancing used

A

-Half of the participants recalled the names and then the locations
-the other half recalled the places first then the names

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why was counterbalancing used

A

This is in order to minimise extraneous variables e.g fatigue to reduce order effects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is a concurrent task

A

an additional activity with a cognitive demand that we can perform at the same time as a primary task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

mention the 2 of the overall results found for all groups

A

-Recalled names were performed better than recalling locations
- few false alarms occurred (average- 0.3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the conclusion of the study

A
  • Doodling aids in concentration during boring tasks as well as memory for information we have not intentionally tried to store
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the DV of the study

A

-The mean correct recall, memory scores and the false alarm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what were the strengths of the study

A

-Standardised procedure could be replicated to test for reliability
-the controls were strict for a cause and effect
-counterbalancing
- those that were aware of the surprise tasks (18%) their scores were excluded however results were the same
- quantiative data collection
- validity (took part in previous study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how was validity shown in the study

A

-The monotonous tone of the call as well as all participants being kept in a dull room. this was valid as any differences between the two conditions was doodling or not.
-the paper for the doodling group was not the same for the control
- they were required to write down a list of names of their friends so that it wouldn’t appear in the mock telephone
- counterbalancing took place

17
Q

what were the weaknesses of the study

A

-Lacked mundane realism to have an unexpected recall task
-lacked generalisability (more motivated to perform better than others)
-use of IMD: some may be able to concentrate better than others or better memory

18
Q

What was the ethic issue in the study and how was it justified

A

Deception
-it was justifiable as it was necessary for the study to be completed successfully and would not have affected the participants in the study.
Therefore NO informed consent

19
Q

applications to everyday life could be

A

> Listening to a class
therapists
attending meetings

20
Q

give an individual explanation to the study

A

-personality type that requires extra simulation when processing info
-some may be used to doodling to concentrate
- The shapes they doodled differed between individuals in the doodling group, people may have doodled in a particular way to help them concentrate better

21
Q

Give a situational explanation to the study

A

-the situation they were placed in or the conditions taken for them to be bored so that the ACT of doodling is what helped.
- It depended which group they belonged to that determined how they performed or not

22
Q

give examples of false alarms when recalling the names of the party go-ers

A
  • Greg for Craig
  • any new name
  • names mentioned as lures
23
Q

Describe what occurred after listening to the tape

A
  • One minute later, participants were surprised with a recall test where they had to write down names of the:
  • party goers (8)
  • Locations (8)
24
Q

Describe the results for the doodling group for monitored task (recording names)

A
  • mean number of names recorded :7.8
  • Number of people scoring full 8/8:
    15/20
  • Number of people made false alarms: 1
25
Q

Describe the results for the control group for monitored task

A
  • mean number of names: 7.1
  • number of people scoring full: 9/20
  • number of people made false alarms: 5
26
Q

Describe the results for the doodling group for the monitored info (recall names)

A
  • mean number of names recalled: 5.1
  • False alarms: 0.4
27
Q

Describe the results for the doodling group for the incidental info (recall places)

A
  • mean number of places recalled: 2.4
  • false alarms: 0.3
28
Q

Describe the results for the control group for the monitored info (recall names)

A
  • mean number of names recalled:4.0
  • false alarms:0.3
29
Q

Describe the results for the control group for the incidental info (recall places)

A
  • mean number of places recalled: 1.8
  • false alarms: 0.3
30
Q

What did the researchers tell the participants

A

“The tape is rather dull and they are not required to remember anything.”

(DOODLING CONDITION: “The shapes were there for you to shade into if you got bored while listening to the tape.” )