Cognitive - Pozzulo 2011 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the background of the study?

A
  • Eye witness testimony putting innocent ppl in jail when target absent eyewitness still picks a person who is guilty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the psychology being investigated in this study?

A
  1. Eyewitness testimony: ppl at crime / accident scene asked by police to tell them what they saw (interviewed w open / closed ques + questionnaire)
  2. False positive results: when witness picks out person from line up and says they were present at crime scene when they actually were not > ppt incorrectly identified as the foil may happen in children bcoz of social pressure than poor memory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the aims of the study?

A
  1. Investigate if cognitive / social factors affect correct identification + false positives responses in line up
  2. Investigate correct identification + false positive responses in line up in relation to familiarity of target

Investigating whether children >
1. Less able to recognise human faces than adults
2. Make more false positives identifications than adults when faced with target absent + present line ups
3. Human faces and cartoon charecters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the child participants

A
  • 59 children from ages of 4 - 7yrs old
  • 21 grils
  • 38 boys
  • 3 kindergarten classes from 3 private schools
  • Eastern Ontario in canada
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the adult participants

A

53 adults
17 - 30 yrs
from introductory psychology participant pool in eastern ontario university
36 females
17 males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the independent variables in the study?

A
  1. Age: young children (4-7yrs) + adults (17 - 30yrs)
  2. Nature of target faces: familiar cartoon charecters OR unfamiliar human faces
  3. Type of line up: Target present OR target absent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the dependent variables in the study?

A
  1. Correct identification rates for target present line ups
  2. Correct rejection rates for target absent line ups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the design of the study

A
  • Mixed design
  • Comparison on age, young children VS adult > INDEPENDENT
  • identification of cartoon VS human faces and identifying from target present VS target absent lineups > REPEATED MEASURES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Materials before the testing phase

A
  • Each ppt / child parent given form for demographics + assess level of familiarity w target cartoons in study
  • 8 questions for
  • age
  • gender
  • first language
  • ethnicity
  • no. of kids in household and their ages
  • how much time spent watching programme
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Human face targets

A
  • 1 male + 1 female caucasian univeristy students (22 years old) as targets
  • 6 second video
  • female brushing her hair in the bathroom
  • male putting on coat and leaving his home
  • 2-3 second close up of individual face
  • Video was in colour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Human face foil

A
  • Each human target photographed in different outfit than what worn in video clip
  • foil selected from pool of 90 female + 90 male faces
  • Selected based on similar appearance to intended target
  • general facial structure, hair length, hair colour
  • 3 raters selected 4 foils for each target
  • Cropped images head and neck
  • Black n white
  • Target present: target + 3 foil
  • Target absent: 4 foil no target
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cartoon targets + foils

A
  • 1 female + 1 male cartoon charecter
  • 6 second clips
  • Dora talking to audience
  • Diego putting on gloves
  • close up of face
  • in colour
  • no sound
  • foils selected from vast range on internet
  • facial structure, hair length, colour
  • 3 raters judged 10 for each target
  • Similar clothes cropped to top of shoulders reduce appearance of clothes
  • Black n white
  • so colours not focus but actual target is focus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the procedure for the children?

A
  1. parents given consent form + demographic sheet
  2. 3 female experimenters + 1 female facilitator
  3. researchers introduced as grp from uni doing project on TV shows + computer programmes
  4. made clear to children that they could change minds at any time
  5. create level of comfort did arts and crafts with children before
  6. children tested individually monitored for stress / fatigue / anxiety
  7. Child told would watch video pay attention ask ques after
  8. after viewing exp. ask child one free recall question> what did the cartoon charecter / person look like?
  9. exp. then asked do you remember anything else?
    if child no response to 1st question asked > do u remember anything from video?
  10. record info
  11. asked child to identify cartoon / person they saw in videos by pointing
  12. told child person may / may not be there
  13. point to sillhouette box if not there
  14. procedure repeated for other 3 videos
    each time remindings that person may not be in lineup
  15. After completing children thanked and given gift (crayons / colour book)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the facilitators role?

A

responsible for entertaining children while they waited to complete the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was the procedure for adults?

A
  1. ppt given consent form that explained study looking at memory
  2. Told would watch video clips + pay attention
  3. after 1st video ppt provided w sheet
  4. Then asked what did cartoon charecter / person look like
  5. Then asked do you remember anything else abt cartoon / person then write down everything they could remember
  6. Then showed lineup via powerpoint on laptop
  7. asked ppt to identify cartoon / person seen in video see if present in lineup on matching sheet
  8. informed ppt may not be there and select silhouette box
  9. repeat for 3 videos > reminded may not be there
  10. after completion given demographic questionnaire assesing familiarity w cartoons
  11. Debriefed and thanked
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the purpose of the free recall question after watching the video clip?

A
  • All ppts asked open ended ques to describe everything they could remember abt each video clip
  • recorded each child ppt response + adult ppt wrote it down
  • PURPOSE: brief filler between exposure of video and presentation of line up
  • Approx 2 mins passed between video exposure + line up presentation
17
Q

What were the 3 controls in the experiment?

A
  1. 4 videos + order of faces in line up was randomised for each ppt - to prevent order effects
  2. stantardised instructions given to each ppt prior to the presentation of photo lineups
  3. All experiments wore same type of professional casual clothing
18
Q

Results for target present line up

A
  • Children correctly identified 23% of human face
  • Children correctly identified 99% of cartoon faces
  • Adults correctly identified 66% of human faces
  • Adults correctly identified 95% of cartoon faces
  • Children significantly more accurate for cartoon faces > higher identification rate
  • children + adult similar for cartoon
  • Adults did better on human face than children
19
Q

Results for target absent line up

A
  • Children correctly rejected 45% human faces
  • Children correctly rejected 74% cartoon faces
  • Adults correctly rejected 70% human faces
  • Adults correctly rejected 94% cartoon faces
  • Children + adult significantly better at correctly rejecting cartoon faces compared to human faces
  • Children significantly worse at correctly rejecting human + cartoon faces compared to adults
20
Q

What are the ethical issues involved in this study?

A
  • had informed cosent for children + adult ppt
  • Ppt told that target may not be present so there was no deception
  • Children monitored for anxiety, stress, fatigue in order to minimise harm
  • important bcoz children less likely to exercise right to withdraw
21
Q

What are the conclusions of this study?

A
  1. Since children were able to identify cartoon charecters w almost 100% accuracy in target present cognitive factors such as bad memory not responsible for the lower success rate in correctly rejecting foils in target absent line ups
  2. Clearly able to recognise charecters logically should have been able to recognise non of the foils was dora / diego yet children still made errors
  3. Error may be caused by social factors believing researcher would prefer them to make a positive identification (pressured to pick an option)
  4. Children + adult have similar correct identification rates for target present
  5. Target absent kids have higher rates of false positives than adults
  6. Errors may be due to social factors (social pressure) rather than cognitive such as bad memory
  7. Desire to please interviewer who children see as authority figure leads to false positive results