cognitive psychology Flashcards
(47 cards)
msm AO1
sensory store-
coding: encoded in a form appropriate to the sense
capacity: all the information from the world passes through senses - very high
duration: 0.5 unless paid attention to it
short term-
coding: acoustic
capacity: 7 items
duration: less than 30 secs unless rehearsed
long term-
coding: semantic
capacity: potentially unlimited
duration: up to a lifetime
msm strengths
supported by baddeley - showed that STM relies on acoustic encoding through experiment where participants were given 4 different lists of 10 different words and told to recall in the same order, worse performance with similar words supporting the MSM idea of stm and ltm being separate stores with distinct coding methods
Clive Wearing - lost many memories and cannot make new ones but remembers his wife and children - demonstrates that STM and LTM are different stores
msm weaknesses
reductionist - over emphasises the role of rehearsal and suggests information needs to be remembered but doesnt consider importance of emotion and relevance of the material to individuals
KF was in a motorcycle accident - his stm was in tact but he couldnt understand things acoustically, only visually which shows that there are separate stm components of visual and verbal information which the msm does not consider or include
wmm AO1
central executive-
function: controller of the model, determines which info is and isnt attended to - directs info to other slave systems
coding: processes information in all sensory forms (modality free)
capacity: limited, one strand of info at one time
visuo spacial sketchpad-
function: temporary store for visual and spatial items and relationships between them - store for what items are and where they are
coding:
visual cache - stores information about form, shapes and color
inner scribe - transfers information from visual cache to central executive
capacity - capacity is limited to about 3-4 items
episodic buffer-
function: temporary store for information, integrating the visual and verbal information, remains a sense of time sequencing by recording events that are happening - can be seen as the storage component of the central executive and also links STM to LTM
coding: both auditory and visual
capacity: about 4 chunks
phonological loop-
function: acoustic store that deals w auditory information + order in which we hear information
capacity: limited, determined by amount of information spoken out loud in 2 seconds
coding:
phonological store - inner ear, stores acoustic items for 1-2 seconds
articulatory control process - inner voice, stores words that have been heard or seen, allows for sub vocal repetition of items in the phonological store
wmm strengths
neuroimaging supports wmm concept - paulescu found while using pet scans that left hemisphere was active during speech tasks and right hemisphere was active during visual tasks - empirical, objective and replicable research gives WMM assumptions validity
helps to explain multi-tasking and learning difficulties such as retro and antrograde amnesia - can be used to create treatments and target brain structured
wmm weaknesses
case studies are too unique to each individual, some would react differently in their situation to different cognitive impairments such as a motorcycle accident or a lobotomy - difficult to generalise to wider population
studies showing wmm lack ecological validity as they lack mundane realism - baddeleys task of describing a letter and following light is not an ordinary activity and doesnt tell us how memory works in normal situations - limitied capacities for both vss and phonological loop
rm AO1
information is stored when it is remembered and rebuilt so it can be affected by extra information and by ideas (like schemas) we already have
every time we recall a memory it is reconstructed - we only record small fragments of information and piece these together when we reconstruct a memory
every time we retell the story the fragments combine slightly differently
memory is an active process - we store fragments/snapshots of information and reconstruct the rest, most of our memories miss a lot of info and can be inaccurate
we use social and cultural schemas to reconstruct the memories
we recall the meaning of the event first - then we make an effort to piece together the story from fragments
rm strength
loftus and palmer demonstrated reconstructive memory through the use of leading questions - by changing the verb to be increasingly persuasive such as knocked, bumped, collided and crashed, the intensity of the crash changed in our minds causing us to remember the actual crash ourselves, evidencing bartletts theory
helps to explain limitations of eyewitness testimony - research demonstrates that schema can effect recall of events and questions the accuracy of testimonies due to people already have predisposed ideas of “criminals”
rm weakness
not all memories are inaccurate or affected by schemas if situations are personally important or distinctive - something black came out of his mouth was remembered by most showing that not everything is reconstructed
barletts study did not use standardised/replicable methods and lacked objectivity - did not have the same experience so its difficult to compare their recounts of the story, evidence underlying rm lacks reliability and validity
war of the ghosts AO1
aimed to investigate how memory is reconstructed when people are asked to recall a story over a period of weeks and months
unfamiliar story from a different culture to see how expectations affect memory
20 participants from cambridge and asked them to reproduce it 15 mins later
showed the new version to another person and asked them to recall it a short time later
participants were asked to recall the story after a few days, weeks, months and years
felt hard cus it was a diff culture - tested to see if memories were reconstructed using cultural norms
story shortened, students altered story to fit into their own cultures - bows and arrows -> guns
memories are fragmented and reconstruct memory based on expectations and predisposed ideas
ltm AO1
different long terms stores due to the vast capacity
propsed by tulving
episodic - personal experiences, time stamped, specific details, context, associated emotions, needs conscious effort to recall memories
semantic - basic knowledge of the world, not time stamped, constantly being added to
procedural - muscle memory, without conscious effort, automatic
ltm strengths
hm had difficulty recalling episodic memories but his semantic memories in tact - couldnt remember stroking a dog but knew what a dog was, could tie his showlaces and walk, after surgery he could form new procedural memories but not semantic or episodic - demonstrates theres diff ltm stores
tulvings pet scans showed that episodic and semantic memories were from prefrontal cortex but semantic in left and episodic in the right - internal validity as it provides objective evidence and shows different memory stores
ltm weaknesses
case studies are specific to one persons situation - cannot generalise that all people in hms situation would react the same
issues arise from studying alzheimers and memory deficits due to socially sensitive nature of it - potentially creates negative perception of them that threatens the dignity of people and can therefore be unethical research
baddeley AO1
aim: investigate encoding in STM and LTM - the influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long term memory for word lists
lab experiment
72 participants from the army
hearing test given beforehand - 3 excluded
4 lists of 10 words to see if participants remember correct words in order
independent groups design - 4 groups learned 1 list each, heard the words presented aloud on tape, 1 word every 3 seconds
40 second to write the words in any order
20 minute distractor task
had to recall the words in order again
this was done 4 times
stm performed worse w acoustically similar words
ltm performed worse w semantically similar words
suggests stm is encoded acoustically, ltm is encoded semantically
baddeley strengths
controlled lab experiment with standardised replicable procedure - reliability could be tested as all participants learned 10 words and each word was shown for exactly 3 seconds - all took part in the distraction task, consistent results
showed that ltm is semantic which can improve long term recall of info - when revising students should try to relate the information to things they already now to process it using mind maps etc - help students process the material semantically
baddeley weaknesses
low generalisability - only used psych students who could have displayed demand characteristics if they are attuned to research methods and guessed the aim as they are cambridge students - not representative of target population
low ecological validity - low mundane realism in memorising a word list semantically and acoustically, cannot assume this is how participants react in real life setting
shg AO1
aim: investigate development of phonological loop of wm in children aged 5-17 digit span
to confirm the findings of studies with english participants with spanish school children
570 volunteers from pre, primary and secondary schools in madrid
all native spanish
5-17 years old
excluded those w hearing/reading/writing impairments
practice sequence to begin
1 digit red per second , 3 trials each
field setting, tested individually at break time, 5 age groups and average digit span recorded for each age group
5/6 aged native spanish kids had shorter digit span than 7 aged english kids
digit span increases w age up to 15 in english kids, 17 in spanish
avg for spanish was lower - due to word length effect
shg strengths
standardised procedure (digit read at 1 per second) means all ppts experienced the same, replicable across other countries, findings agree with the english participants results
can be used to understand real life cognitive skills - short digit span is linked to dyslexia and long digit span linked to better readers
brain structure AO1
cns detects environmental changes and stimuli and processes information to prod a response and coordinates muscles to prod a response
pns associated w physiological responses, sympathetic fight or flight is automatic/involuntary response for stressful situations
cerebral cortex - conscious thought/decisions
frontal lobe - higher order thinking/planning, controls motor area, brocas area
parietal lobe - sensations like touch, heat, pressure, integrates info for complex behavior
occipital lobe - visual info like color, shape, distances, damage leads to vision issues
temporal lobe - auditory processing, wernicke’s area, damage leads to hearing loss or aphasia
cerebellum maintains balance and coordination and movement
limbic system is processing emotions, fight or flight response
thalamus is the sensory relay station, sends input to relevant brain areas, sleep wakefulness, ocd
hypothalamus - maintains homeostasis
brain stem - autonomic functions, heart rate, vomiting reflex
shg weaknesses
artificial task has low mundane realism - digit span testing is not something u do in everyday life
lack of controls like testing for impairments and relied on children or parents info
brain structure strengths
objective explanation that can be measured - physical evidence
can inform clinical treatments (targeting neural pathways with medication or therapies) and has application in forensic psychology to assess offenders risk and responsibility in cases involving brain damage
brain structure weakness
reductionist - only focuses on biological factors rather than environmental nuture aspects
correlation is not causation - damage could be a result of aggression not the cause, cannot make that assumption
neurotransmitters AO1
chemical messengers that transmit signals across a synapse
stored in vesicles in axon terminal
released into synapse when action potential reaches terminal
binds to receptors on next neuron
serotonin - mood regulation, sleep, appetite - low levels linked to depression, aggression, impulsivity
dopamine - reward, motivation, movement - high levels linked to schitzophrenia, low levels affect motivation and attention
GABA - calms nervous system, reduces activity - low levels linked to anxiety and seizures
norepinephrine - arousal and alertness - imbalance linked to stress response, anxiety and mood disorders
acetylcholine - learning, memory, muscle movement - linked to alzheimers
excitatory (eg glutamate) increases chance of new impulse
inhibitory (eg GABA) decrease chance of an impulse
neurotransmitters strengths
scientific and measurable - can be measured using brain scans, drug trials, post mortem studies, providing objective and quantifiable data
led to effective treatments such as ssris for depression or antipsychotics for schitzophrenia - shows practical use in improving mental health