learning theories Flashcards
(12 cards)
classical conditioning
unconditioned stimulus = unconditioned response
neutral stimulus + unconditioned stimulus = unconditioned response
conditioned stimulus = conditioned response
stimulus generalisation - once animals are conditoned, they will respond to other stimuli that are similar
discrimination - conditioning can be focused on a specific stimuli, specific item produces response
extinction: CR isnt permanent, when cs and ucs have not been paired for a while, cs ceases to elicit the cr
spontaneous recovery: following extinction, when cs and ucs are paired together again the link is made quicker
classical conditioning strengths
treatments for phobias or aversions to food, can classically condition to unlink
pavlovs dog supports
classical conditioning weakness
social learning theory
experimented on dogs which have different brain structures and psychology to humans
pavlov AO1
aim: investigate associative learning and understanding if a reflex response with a neutral stimulus produces a conditoned response
repeated measures design
25 dogs, variety of breeds, raised in kennels in the lab
dogs placed into sealed room, controlled measure
strapped into harness, mouth surgically linked to tube that drained saliva into measuring bottle
sound of metronome paired with presentation of food, causing salivation - repeated 20 times
after the dog was conditioned, sound of metronome but no food and number of drops of saliva were counted and collected in measuring tube
pavlov found the conditioned dog started to salivate 9 seconds after hearing the sound, in 45 seconds, 11 drops produced
secondary conditioning occured if the first cs causing the cs paired with another neutral stimulus
pavlov strengths
classical conditioning is accepted in aversion therapy - involves extinguishing undesireable behavior by pairing with negative stimulus
high internal validity, controlled lab experiment
pavlov weakness
low ecological validity and mundane realism
dogs surgically implanted with cannula and kept in sealed room - no bps guidelines established and therefore study is unethical
little albert AO1
aim: to investigate classical conditioning to condition fear response
repeated measures design
1 male 9 month old baby
presented with range of animals and objects - white rat selecred as he was NOT scared of it
tested for innate fear response by striking hammer on a steel bar causing him to cry
little albert was conditoned at 11 months old, white rat was presented with the banging noise
procedure repeated
31 days later, little albert was tested for stimuli by observing fearful behaviors towards a rabbit, dog and santa mask
little albert cried when presented with the mouse
stimulus generalisation was shown as he cried when shown similar stimuli
transfer of response to another setting as he showed the same behavior towards a rat and rabbit in different locations
little albert strengths
standardised replicable procedure
can be applied to aversion therapy
little albert weakness
low population validity - 1 9 month old baby from the USA
unethical - details of the nature of experiment ommitted, deception
operant conditioning AO1
bf skinner
voluntary behaviors which we consciously control can be learned through understanding consequence of our actions
reinforcement - when desired behavior is reawrded with pleasant consequences
positive reinforcement - rewards the desired behavior by adding positive
negative reinforcement - rewards the desired behavior by removing negative
primary reinforcement - reward is not a basic need, learn to value the reinforcement
positive punishment - consequence is receiving something unpleasant
negative punishment - removing something desirable
operant conditioning strengths
observable and scientific - measurable outcomes
real world application to education, parenting, behavioral therapy
operant conditioning weakness
ignores mental proceeses like thoughts, emotions or motivation
supporting evidence involved non human animals which raises ethical concerns and may not fully generalise to human behavior - low external validity