concentrated poverty 6 Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

What is the principal strength of Chetty & Hendren’s national tax-data study?

A

External validity—it leverages essentially every (deidentified) U.S. tax record over a 30-year span, making its findings highly generalizable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the main weakness of Chetty & Hendren’s approach compared to MTO?

A

Internal validity—without randomized neighborhood assignment, they must rely on quasi-experimental shifts in areas rather than pure randomization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In Chetty & Hendren’s design, what key assumption allows them to infer causal effects from natural moves?

A

That the timing of a household’s move relative to a child’s age is unrelated to the characteristics of the destination area.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do Chetty & Hendren (2018a,b) validate the MTO findings in a broader context?

A

They show that when any child moves to a location where other children tend to earn more as adults, that child also experiences higher adult earnings—mirroring MTO patterns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What relationship do they find between duration of childhood exposure to better neighborhoods and adult outcomes?

A

Improvements in adult outcomes (e.g. earnings) are proportional to the number of years the child spent in the higher-opportunity area during childhood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does the population mix in their tax-data study compare to MTO’s sample?

A

It includes a much wider range of incomes and races/ethnicities, indicating the neighborhood effects apply across diverse groups.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What method do they use to identify the best places for children to grow up?

A

Analyzing movements across counties and commuting zones to pinpoint which counties causally boost a child’s future earnings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which county-level characteristics are most predictive of a place’s causal effect on low-income children’s earnings?

A

Less concentrated poverty, lower income inequality, higher-quality schools, greater share of two-parent families, lower crime rates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the analytic nature of their county-characteristic evaluation?

A

It is correlational—they identify which observable place features are most strongly associated with the estimated causal effects from moves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What key policy insight emerges from Chetty & Hendren’s national work?

A

That improving neighborhood conditions—especially those five characteristics—could systematically enhance long-run life outcomes for children across the U.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly