Conservatism - Key Principles Flashcards

1
Q

Pragmatism meaning

A

Pragmatism rejects ideology and theory in favour of decisions made on the basis of practical experience and ‘what works’. It implies a flexible political approach that considers what is acceptable to, and in the best interests of, the people, and what ensures social stability and cohesion.
According to Edmund Burke (see page 43 to find out more about Burke’s influence on conservatism):
*Example is the school of mankind, and they will learn at no other.’ Likewise, Michael Oakeshot (for more on Oakeshott, see page 44) said: ‘To be a Conservative is to prefer the tried to the untried.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tradition meaning

A

Tradition refers to the institutions, customs and beliefs of a society that has developed over time. The term also implies that such practices will
be passed on from generation to generation.
According to G.K. Chesterton (1874-1936):
‘Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Arguments in favour of pragmatism

A

Human nature: humans lack the intellectual ability to fully understand the complex realities of the world.
Theories, abstract ideas or ideologies that claim to
“explain’ or ‘improve’ the condition of human life are rejected as potentially destabilising.
Society: abstract ideas and principles such as
‘equality and ‘rights’ are dangerous because they can lead to radical change (often through revolution) that produces worse rather than better conditions.
The state: a pragmatic approach that emphasises caution, moderation, gradualism and continuity will introduce necessary change or reform without endangering social cohesion or stability.
The economy: the One Nation conservative approach to the economy is described below.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Arguments in favour of tradition

A

Human nature: tradition provides humans, who are weak and security-seeking, with the social framework to make sense of society and their place within it.
Society: long-established institutions, customs and practices give communities and nations a strong sense of identity that encourages social cohesion and security. Any attempt to remove the traditional’ base of society will lead to insecurity and instability.
The state: tradition represents the accumulated wisdom of the past. State institutions and practices that have proved ‘fit for purpose over time (for example, the monarchy, constitution and House of Lords) should be preserved for the benefit of future generations.
The economy: the capitalist market system has endured as an efficient, dynamic and productive form of economic organisation. It should be maintained as long as it doesn’t undermine conservative values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

There are two strands of conservative thinking on pragmatism:

A

Traditional conservatives such as Burke argue that cautious pragmatism enables a society to adapt to changing circumstances by introducing moderate changes/reforms rather than reject change completely and risk revolution. A key aim of this change to conserve policy is to safeguard the essential features of society such as property, order, tradition and established institutions, such as the monarchy.

One Nation conservatives (see page 40 to find out more about this philosophy) adopt a pragmatic middle way economic policy that combines market competition with government regulation. They
generating the funding for state welfare provision.
argue that this promotes growth and social stability by creating wealth through the private sector and

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is human imperfection

A

Human imperfection has to be reined in because of people’s capacity for evil.
Furthermore, since humans are dependent and insecure, they can only exist in an organic state or society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Three aspects of human imperfection

A

Psychological
Moral
Intellectual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Psychological aspect of human imperfection

A

As limited and dependent beings, humans desire familiarity, safety and the security of knowing their place in society. Consequently, people need social order rather than liberty. An ordered society provides security, predictability and stability. Liberty brings choice, change and uncertainty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Moral aspect of human imperfection

A

As naturally selfish beings, humans are morally imperfect. Thus, human nature accounts for antisocial or criminal behaviour, not social or economic deprivation.
A tough law-and-order system that punishes such conduct is the only deterrent capable of tackling human moral imperfection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intellectual aspect of human imperfection

A

Humans lack the intellect and powers of reasoning to understand a complex world. Conservatives therefore reject theories or ideologies that claim to explain or predict the development of human society. Instead, humans should be pragmatic and rely on history, tradition and practical experience to understand their place in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Due to the weakness of human nature, conservatives argue that: (state, societal, economic)

A

-the state has to impose tough law-and-order policies to deter criminal behaviour and pursue foreign policies based on national security, not
“Liberal” notions of international cooperation and harmony

-society has to be based on authority, hierarchy and paternalism in order to provide people with stability, predictability and security
• an economy based on capitalism is a more powerful motivator than altruism since humans are self-interested.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why do conservatives value an organic society?

A

Authority
Living organism
Paternalism
Hierarchy
Trad. institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Role of authority in an organic society

A

top-down authority shapes relations between the different social groups and permeates all social institutions, such as schools and families.
Authority provides humans with direction and security, promotes social cohesion by showing people where they ‘fit in’ and offers leadership roles to be admired and respected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Role of the living organism as an organic society

A

society functions like a living organism with all its carefully balanced parts working together in harmony to ensure that the ‘body remains healthy, social cohesion is preserved and atomism avoided.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Role of trad. Institutions in an organic society

A

long-ständing institutions play a key role in preserving the ‘health’ of society and the state and meet the human need for security.
They should not be radically changed or abolished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Role of hierarchy in an organic society

A

a hierarchy based on fixed ranks and inequalities, partly because humans vary in terms of their intellect, skills, etc., and partly because different groups or classes have to perform different roles in society such as political leadership, business management or manual work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Role of paternalism in an organic society

A

the most advantaged (in terms of financial rewards or status) have the greatest social responsibilities.
For example, managers are paid more than their workers because their role is more demanding but they are obliged to protect the jobs and economic well-being of their workforces. In this way, economic inequality is justified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is paternalism?

A

Paternalism is the traditional conservative belief that government should be conducted by those best equipped to lead and make decisions through birth, inheritance and upbringing. Paternalism is strongly linked to conservative views on hierarchy, order and the organic society. In short, it represents a form of benign power exerted from above by the state that governs in the interest of the population as a whole. One Nation conservatism softened this notion (see page 40).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is libertarianism?

A

Libertarianism is a strand of conservative thinking influenced by Adam Smith’s arguments for economic liberalism. It advocates:
• individual liberty
• maximum economic freedom
• minimal government or state regulation.
Now more commonly known as the liberal new right or neo-liberalism (see page 42), it rejects paternalism.
Key libertarian thinkers include Friedrich von Hayek, Ayn Rand and Robert Nozick (see page 44).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Arguments in favour of paternalism ( human nature, economic, society, state)

A

Human nature: in the past, traditional conservatives (such as Burke) argued that the innate or hereditary abilities of the social elite gave them the authority to make decisions on society’s behalf and impose on them an obligation to care for the less fortunate (see page 39). Modern One Nation conservatives similarly maintain that, since human ability is not evenly distributed, the successful are entitled to their rewards but they also have a social responsibility to look after those who are unable to look after themselves (see page 40).
The economy: One Nation paternalistic conservatism, originally introduced by Disraeli (see page 40) and recently exhibited by the Cameron and May governments, has argued that government regulation of the economy and social welfare measures are necessary to improve conditions for the poorest.
Society: conservative paternalism blends principle with pragmatism (see page 36) - the privileged in society have a social responsibility to look after the less fortunate and, in so doing, they aim to preserve their position, strengthen the hierarchical nature of society and remove threats to the social order.
The state: since 1945, One Nation conservatives have argued that the modern state is the most appropriate agency through which to deliver social welfare and economic regulation in the interests of all (see page 40). Paternalism (notably in its state-directed form) can be soft when recipients give their consent or hard when it is imposed regardless of consent or opposition.

21
Q

Arguments in favour of libertarianism (exonomy, state, human nature)

A

The economy: the free market is the only mechanism that can:
• efficiently supply goods and services on the basis
of consumer demand
• determine the ‘natural’ level of unemployment.
Inflation poses the biggest threat to the market economy because it inhibits economic and business activity. To curb inflation, government spending has to be cut to control the money supply.
The state: state involvement in the mixed economy, welfare programmes and public ownership are rejected as too expensive and inefficient. Instead,
‘supply side’ economic policies (see page 42) should be pursued to boost production. Obstacles such as government regulation, high taxation and trade-union influence over the labour market should be removed to release the wealth-creating potential of the free market. Taxation represents a form of legalised ‘state robbery’ by transferring property (income) from one individual to another without consent, thereby undermining property rights.
Human nature: humans are naturally competitive, autonomous, individualistic, self-interested and rational. For this reason, social welfare provision Is rejected on moral grounds since such programmes create a , ‘dependency culture’ undermining personal responsibility, freedom and initiative

22
Q

Origin of trad. Conservativism

A

Traditional conservatism emerged in the late 18th century as a critical response to the French Revolution and the Enlightenment. Edmund Burke’s famous book Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) is the classic work in favour of traditional conservatism.

23
Q

Features of trad. Cons

A

Gradual reform ( to preserve fabric of society)
Pragmatism
Trad institutions
Hierarchy
Living organisms

24
Q

Rule by the ‘natural aristocracy’ meaning

A

Burke maintained that the ‘true natural aristocracy should govern. These are the people with the ability, experience and inclination to lead the nation wisely in the interest of the whole society. Burke thought this small governing elite would be largely (but not exclusively) drawn from the hereditary aristocracy.

25
Q

Trad cons defence of aristocratic rule (2)

A

-Rule by the aristocracy was natural since, for generations, the upper class had been raised and educated to govern at all levels in society.
As large property holders, they also had a significant stake in society.

-The longstanding practice of aristocratic rule was based on paternalism (see page 38) and the concept of noblesse oblige. This meant that those in authority were best placed, and had a duty, to make decisions on behalf of society as a whole.

26
Q

French Revolution

A

A major upheaval in France between 1789 and 1799 that violently removed the monarchy and the privileged position of the aristocracy and the Church. Traditional conservatism was a reaction to the French Revolution by the British ruling elite to justify their own privileged position and thereby avoid the same fate as their French counterparts.

27
Q

The Enlightenment

A

The Enlightenment was an 18th-century European intellectual movement that stressed the importance of human reason and the need to examine critically existing ideas, institutions and traditions. Traditional conservatives rejected much Enlightenment thinking on the grounds that it would encourage rapid, indiscriminate and destabilising change.

28
Q

Reflections on the Revolution in France

A

Edmund Burke’s 1790 classic study of the French Revolution attacked the assumption that a system of government could be created on the basis of abstract principles and theories (such as liberty and equality). In his view, the French Revolution illustrated the dangers of sudden and far-reaching change. The removal of the monarchy and aristocratic privilege by popular revolution undermined the stability of French society by challenging established notions of authority, tradition, hierarchy and property. Furthermore, he feared that France’s new leaders would lack the experience, restraint and understanding to perform their role. As a result, the country would be plunged into chaos.

29
Q

Emergence of One Natuon cons

A

-The rise of laissez-faire capitalism in the 19th century led to fears that a self-interested individualism was undermining the basis of the organic society and the idea of social responsibility.
-Growing industrialisation during the same period led to concern that Britain was becoming two nations’ (the rich and the poor) and that this division would destabilise society, sharpen class conflict and possibly lead to revolution.
One Nation conservatism softened the ideas of paternalism, seeing it as the responsibility of the well-off to look after those who are less fortunate.

30
Q

Disraeli’s analysis

A

Disraeli wanted to reconcile the ‘two nations’. He argued that conservatism would have to respond to these social and economic changes by renewing its commitment to reform and social obligation.
His motives were both pragmatic and principled:
• Reforms to improve conditions for the poorest would reduce social discontent, preserve the position of the upper classes, and probably increase working-class support for the Conservative Party.
* The most privileged social groups had a moral and paternalistic duty to help the poor. This included social welfare measures to preserve
“one nation”, This is often understood as the idea of noblesse oblige.

31
Q

Conservative gov and one nation cons 1951-64

A

This was the high point of One Nation conservatism:
• The government used Keynesian economics (see page 51 for more on this approach to the economy) to maintain high employment, accepting the mixed economy and supporting the welfare state.
• Harold Macmillan referred to this One Nation approach as a ‘middle way between unrestrained liberalism (individualism and the free market) and socialist collectivism (extensive state control and planning).
• R.A. Butler, a 1950s-1960s One Nation conservative minister, stated that government policy at the time was designed to bring Disraeli’s two nations ‘into a single social entity’.

32
Q

One nation cons under Harold Mac.

A

• Conservative prime minister (1957-1963).
• His classic study, The Middle Way (1938), proposed a ‘halfway house’ between unrestricted capitalism and state socialism, to include public ownership of key industries, government direction of investment and state-funded welfare to establish a minimum standard of living.
• He argued that a managed economy and
‘orderly capitalism’ would preserve the cohesion of the ‘one nation’ and prevent social unrest.
• One Nation conservatism remained the dominant strand in conservative thinking from the 1950s to the 1970s.

33
Q

Background on the New Right

A

New Right conservatism emerged in the 1970s as the main rival to One Nation conservatism (see page 40 for a discussion of this approach). The New Right brought together two distinct strands - neo-liberalism (or liberal New Right) and neo-conservatism (or conservative New Right).

34
Q

Rise of the New Right

A

• New Right thinking gained momentum in the 1970s as the interventionist policies of Western governments (based on welfare provision and Keynesian techniques; see page 51) failed to combat stagflation (an economy experiencing rising inflation, little or no growth and rising unemployment).
• New Right conservatism was prominent in the 1980s in the UK and the USA and became popularly linked with UK PM Margaret Thatcher (1979-1990) and US President Ronald Reagan (1981-1989).
• This New Right perspective was frequently referred to as ‘Reaganism’ or ‘Thatcherism

35
Q

New Right made up of (2)

A

Neo-lib
Neo-cons

36
Q

What is neo-lib

A

An updated form of classical liberalism (see page 49) that calls for a free market economy, a minimal state and individual freedom and responsibility.

37
Q

What is neo-cons?

A

A modernised version of traditional conservative socia thinking that emphasises social onder, traditional values and public morality.

38
Q

Radical elements of the New Right

A

The New Right opposes economic and social intervention by the government and adopts anti-permissiveness regarding social attitudes and moral choices.

39
Q

Trad elements of the New Right

A

Neo-conservatives endorse traditional views such as family values, respect for authority, and the benefits of hard work.

40
Q

Reactionary elements of the New Right

A

The New Right often appear to regard the 19th century as a ‘golden age of economic freedom and individual moral responsibility. A reactionary person or attitude favours a return to an earlier situation or period on the grounds that it possessed positive features that are currently lacking. The term is usually associated with right-wing politics.

41
Q

Key principles of neo-lib

A

The free-market economy is the only mechanism that can meet consumer demand effectively, make maximum use of resources and produce the greatest overall prosperity. Government intervention cannot do this and creates or exacerbates economic problems.
The free market has to be protected against:
• inflation, which discourages economic activity and investment
• industrial or business monopolies, which reduce economic competition and consumer choice
• government intervention, which creates inflation by introducing too much money or credit into the economy.
Inflation
The government’s vital economic role is to tackle inflation. Thatcher and Reagan adopted Friedman’s monetarist policy in the 1980s to reduce inflation by controlling the money supply through cuts in public spending. This neo-liberal approach is generally known as ‘supply side’ economics (see page 38 to read more about libertarianism).
Rejection of government intervention
State planning, nationalisation and high taxation lead to economic inefficiency and lack of incentive. State welfare provision expands, irrespective of demand, due to the vested interests of the professionals concerned (for example, doctors) and political parties (promising increased welfare spending in elections).
The result is rising taxation and inflation, and increasingly inefficient state welfare services.
Atomistic individualism
Individuals are rational, self-interested and self-sufficient. Individual freedom can only be safeguarded by opposing collectivism and ‘rolling back’ the state, to release human potential and create natural harmony through free relations.

42
Q

Key principles of neo-cons

A

Social order
The ‘liberal 1960s, with its progressive reforms,
1
ideas and attitudes, undermined the social order by threatening society with fragmentation (for example, the decline of authority and respect, rising crime rates and increased anti-social behaviour). Social order can only be safeguarded by:
• strong political leadership and a renewed emphasis on government authority
• re-introducing discipline, hierarchy and respect throughout society to re-establish the authority of the family and other traditional social institutions.
Traditional values
Traditional values, such as respect for authority and the law, and the benefits of hard work, have to be upheld to strengthen society and restore social discipline. To achieve this, the ‘strong state’ has to be promoted, with greater police powers and tougher penalties to combat crime and public disorder. During the 1980s, Thatcher and Reagan took a tough stance on law and order, believing that such an approach would deter those who were tempted to commit illegal acts and thus challenge the traditional values of society.

Public morality
d
The permissive ‘anything goes’ culture that developed in some Western countries in the 1960s undermined public morality by allowing people to make their own moral choices and suggesting there is no objective right and wrong.
If an individual is allowed to make their own moral or lifestyle choices, two problems arise:
• The person may adopt an ‘immoral’ code or lifestyle.
• If people are free to choose different moral positions, this undermines the development of common moral standards and threatens social cohesion.
Thatcher (“Victorian values’) and the Moral Majority in the USA (traditional values) illustrate the neoconservative concern with public morality.

43
Q

The Road to Serfdom

A

Friedrich von Hayek’s (1944) pioneering study was addressed to ‘the socialists of all parties. It argued that state interventionism and collectivism, even if pursued moderately, would erode individual liberty and create a new form of serfdom or slavery. Free individuals would become dominated by, and dependent on, the state (via welfare provision). Hayek’s study became a key text for supporters of the free market and opponents of Keynesian-style interventionism and state welfare provision, including
British conservatives Keith Joseph and Margaret Thatcher.

44
Q

Thomas Hobbes

A

In his book Leviathan (1651), Hobbes developed two important conservative ideas:
Order: an ordered society should balance the human need to lead a free life.
2
Human nature: humans are needy, vulnerable and easily led astray in their attempts to understand the world around them.
Uses
The ordered society
• In a ‘state of nature’, humans are free from authority. A ‘restless desire for power’ would
lead to war.
• Rational people would therefore sacrifice their freedom and natural rights for security through the establishment of political authority.
• Government is therefore established by the joint consent of the people, and authorises those in power to preserve order and peace.
Human nature
Humans demonstrate needy and vulnerable characteristics by:
• competing violently to obtain the basic necessities of life and other material gains fighting out of fear to ensure their personal safety
• seeking reputation, both for its own sake and to avoid being challenged by others.
Human capacity to reason is fragile. People’s attempts to interpret the world are distorted by self-interest and the concerns of the moment.
Hobbes asked: ‘How could a state be governed, or protected in its foreign relations if every individual remained free to obey or not to obey the law according to his private opinion?’

45
Q

Edmund Burke

A

In Reflections on the Revolution in France
(1790), Burke developed two key conservative ideas:
Change to conserve has to be undertaken with caution and mindful of the delicate balance inherent in an organic society.
2
Respect tradition and empiricism because they represent practices passed down from one generation to the next.
Uses
Cautious change
• The state resembles a living organism like a plant that may be changed through gentle ‘pruning’ or grafting’ in order to preserve the stability and harmony of the social and political order.
• Reform should be limited and cautious, and be based on empiricism and tradition, rather than new abstract principles.
• Revolutionary change threatens to cut off the
‘roots’ of the organic society (such as the institutions and customs that gave it stability), leading to social and political breakdown.
For more on Burke’s views on the French
Revolution, see page 39.
Tradition and empiricism
• They represent the accumulated and ‘tested wisdom of the past residing in society’s longstanding institutions, customs and practices.
• Continuing respect for tradition and empiricism promotes social continuity and stability and provides the essential reference points for
‘necessary’ change.
• They encourage social cohesion and security because they offer people a sense of being
‘rooted’ in, and tied to, their particular society.
According to Burke: ‘It is with infinite caution that any man ought to venture upon pulling down an edifice which has answered in any tolerable degree for ages the common purposes of society, or on building it up again without having the model and patterns of approved utility before his eyes.’

46
Q

Ayn Rand

A

Key ideas
Rand’s novels The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957) advocated:
Objectivism: rational self-interest is a virtue. The pursuit of rational self-interest is morally right, based on ‘the virtue of selfishness’
2
Freedom: support for a completely unregulated, laissez-faire economy, compatible with the free expression of human rationality.
Uses
You can use Rand when discussing human nature and the economy (as above).

47
Q

Michael Oakeshott

A

Key ideas
In Rationalism in Politics (1962) and On Human Conduct (1975), Oakeshott stressed two concepts:
1
Human imperfection: society is unpredictable and humans are imperfect. They lack the mental faculties to make sense of a complex modern world.
2
Pragmatism: conservatism is about being pragmatic.
Uses
Society
A ‘rationalist’ political leader is inclined to make decisions based on the ‘authority’ of his own reason (rather than practical experience). This encourages the dangerous idea that the leader fully understands society and how it should be changed, as was the case, for example, in fascism and communism.
The state
Political thinking and action should be guided by pragmatism and practical experience to ensure public acceptance, maintain social stability and cohesion and respond flexibly to shifting circumstances; the British parliamentary system is a good example of what can result from this thinking.

48
Q

Robert Nozick

A

In Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974), Nozick promoted:
Libertarianism: individuals have rights to their lives, liberty and the rewards of their labour (based partly on the ideas of Immanuel Kant, 1724-1804). They cannot be treated as things or used against their will.
Self-ownership: individuals own their own bodies, talents, abilities and labour. This is threatened by enforced taxation to fund welfare (it gives others part of the individual’s rewards) and by state regulation over the individual (for example, anti-smoking measures).
Uses
You can use Nozick when discussing human nature, the state and the economy.
The state
Taxes levied for state welfare are immoral because they treat individuals as a means/resource (rather than an end in themselves). Only a minimal state can be justified.
This is threatened by enforced taxation to fund welfare (it gives others part of the individual’s rewards), and by state regulation over the individual (for example, anti-smoking measures).