consumption theory Flashcards
(27 cards)
aggregate demand
Y= C+I+G+NX
consumption
what do do with income and a decision not to save
largest component of GDP- two-thirds in developed economies
less volatile than output and investment- consumption smoothing
keynesian consumption function and consumption puzzle
C= C (bar) +cY
Consumption = autonomous consumption plus the marginal propensity to consume times income
Keynes theory has consumption function as a key part of business cycles
key points from this…
Marginal propensity (MPC) to consume is between 0 and 1
MPC- If one extra pound is earned how much will the household choose to consume. Some will be spent or saved
In Keynes work- a large fiscal policy multipliers comes from the assumption of high MPC (choose to consume a lot)
Average propensity to consume (APC) falls as income rises, rich people save a higher proportion of money than poor people.
No interest rate in Keynes function, doesn’t determine consumption
keynes theory success
housholds survey data showed higher income, consume more, saved more and saved a larger fraction of income
time series (short) consumption saving low when income low
data also suggested income as a primary determinant of consumption
Keynes problem (Consumption puzzle)
with keynes consumption- possible depression after ww2, income grow and consumption would fall as economy became richer nowhere fro excessive saving as wartime demand diminished
keynes suggested fiscal stimulus would be necessary to expand AD
but high incomes did not lead to higher saving rate, APC didn’t fall.
First observation of Puzzle
Kuznets constructed new data on Y and C finding large increases in income over studied period and APC remained remarkably stable from decade to decade
keynes worked for household and short data but problems arose with longer data
indifference curves
combinations of period one and period two consumption that make the household equally happy
absolute slope of indifference curve
marginal rate of intertemporal substitution (MRIS)
MRIS is how much future consumption the household is willing to give up to increase present consumption by 1 unit
indifference curve MRIS
When consumption tomorrow is higher the MRIS is high- the household is willing to give up more of tomorrow’s consumption in exchange for 1 extra unit of consumption today
opportunity cost of increasing consumption today by 1 unit
1+r (consumption that is foregone tmrw)
optimal consumption
MRIS+(1+r)
individual discount rate = market discount rate
how much C2 the consumer is willing to trade for 1 unit of C1 = how much C2 the market is willing to trade for 1 unit of C1
MRIS > 1+r worth giving up C2 and vice versa
the tangency point between an indifference curve and the IBC (that achieves the highest indifference curve and determines if a household is a net lender or borrower)
optimal consumption algebraically
U’(C1)/U’(C2) = (1+r)
what happens if income changes
temporary- changes in either presen or future income, work bonus
permanent changes- promotion
both cases shift the IBCto the right but temporary changes lead to smaller shifts
if Y1 increases butt Y2 remains unchanged consumption will increase in both periods
as
households prefer stable consumption pattern and will save part of the current increase in income (consumption smoothing)
Y2 increases then current consumption increases as well as consumption depends on lifetime wealth
this contrasts keynes who said that current consumption depends on current income
policy insights related to temp increase in income
may not be effective in stimulating due to increase being smoothed across a life time
impact of tax cut might be lower than a model with a keynesian consumption function
change in real interest rate
increase in r
increases slope of the IBC, rotating clockwise around the endowment point
increases the cost of borrowing
having an substitution effect, reduces current consumption and increases future consumption- relatively more to consume today
Income effect- borrower- increases interest payments on your current borrowing reducing disposable income and consumption
saver- disposable income increases and increased consumption
what does model suggest about changing interest rates
model suggests changing ir can affect consumption decision by changing consumption (via changing borrowing and saving)
central banks cutting interest rates during a recession to stimulate the economy, but interest rate changes can lead to consumption decision across many periods which dampen its short run effectiveness
borrowing constraints
if there are agents can’t borrow as much as they like/need
due to incomplete markets, asymmetric information and uncertainty
model smooths consumption perfectly- model generates too much smoothness as consumption depends strongly on disposable income.
(credit constrained)
what if households cant borrow
cant reach highest indifference curve
consumes all period one income today
IBC is kinked, optimal consumption is C1=Y1
changes in current income changes consumption
explains C is more volatile than predicted by models
credit rationing sub optimal consumption and higher volatility
theories that reconcile the consumption puzzle
France Modigliani’s Life Cycle hypothesis (LCH)
Milton Friedman’s Permanent-Income Hypothesis
(PIH)
Life Cycle Hypotheisis (LCH)
income varies systematically over peoples lives
saving allows movement of income from high income periods to low income periods
C=aW+Beta(Y)
a- MPC out of Wealth (W)
Beta- MPC out of current income(Y)
over time as W rises the consumption function shifts up
LCH- APC is C/Y = a(W/Y) + Beta
(Short time series) as W does not vary proportionatlry with income from person to person, year to year high Y results in low APC
long time series, W and Y do vary proportionally, consumption function shifts up over time as W rises leaving APC more stable over time
Permanent-Income Hypothesis (PIH)
PIH, people experience random and transitory changes in their income over time
PIH, divides income into permanent and Transitory Income
Y=Yp+Yt
permanent- part of income that people to expect to persist into the future
transitory- part of income that people do not expect to persist
(random deviation from average income, win in gamble)
theory believes permanent income is main source of consumption
saving and borrowing used to smooth over fluctuations in transitory income
PIH consumption function
C= aY^p
PIH APC
C/Y = a(Y^p)/Y
PIH short term series data
increase in Y comes from changes in Y^T and are not spent
when Y rises because of Y^T the APC temporarily falls- higher Y results in low APC