Core studies - Piliavin - Paper 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

A

Investigate which factors affect helping behaviour
Investigate diffusion of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Research method

A

Field experiment
Took place in NY subway on a journey that takes around 7.5 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

IVs

A

If victim was lame (carrying a cane) or drunk
Race of victim (black/white)
Effect of a model (after 70/150 seconds, from the critical or adjacent area) or no model
Size of the witnessing group - naturally occuring variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DVs

A

Frequency of help
Speed of help
Race of helper
Gender of helper
Movement out of critical areas
Verbal comments from bystanders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sample

A

4,500 men and women who used the subway on weekdays between 11am and 3pm between 15 April and 26 June 1968
Approx. 45% black, 50% white
All researchers were General Studies students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Researchers

A

4 teams of 4
Two female observers
One to act as a victim - male
One to act as a model - male
3 victims were white, one was black

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Model conditions

A

Critical area and early - 70 seconds
Critical area and late - 150 seconds
Adjacent area and early - 70 seconds
Adjacent area and late - 150 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Model conditions

A

Critical area and early - 70 seconds
Critical area and late - 150 seconds
Adjacent area and early - 70 seconds
Adjacent area and late - 150 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Observation

A

Victim stood in the critical area
After 70 seconds he collapsed and looked at the ceiling until being helped
If no one else helped the model would
6 - 8 trials run a day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Findings

A

Lame victim helped spontaneously 95% of the time
Drunk victim helped spontaneously 50% of the time
Overall 100% help for lame victim compared to 81% for the drunk
Help offered more quickly to the lame victim
In 60% of the trials, there were 2 or more helpers
90% of the first helpers were men
Slight tendency for same - race helping especially in drunk condition
No diffusion of responsibility found

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Conclusions

A

Someone who appears lame/ill is more likely to receive help than someone who seems drunk
Men are more likely to help men than women are
People are more likely to help those of the same race as them
No relationship between amount of bystanders and speed of helping
More likely to receive help if others don’t think they brought the situation on themselves
When they have no chance to leave bystanders are more helpful
A cost-reward analysis is conducted before a bystander helps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strengths

A

Naturalistic environment - high EV
No demand characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Weaknesses

A

Victims, models and most helpers were male so it is hard to generalise to females
No chance for consent, withdrawal or debrief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly