CRIME AND DEVIANCE: Theories of C&D Flashcards

1
Q

What are Crimes?

A

Behaviours that break formal, written rules in society (laws)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Deviance?

A

Behaviour that doesn’t conform to a society’s consensus norms and laws (‘Unwritten Rules’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between crime and deviance?

A

Criminal behaviour breaks a rule agreed in parliament and passed into law whereas deviant behaviour is so unusual it makes others consider you dangerous or undesirable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does ‘Social Construction’ refer to in crime and deviance?

A

Social construction is the creation of social facts through a strong value consensus. This explains why definitions change along with norms of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Durkheim believe about the functions of Crime and Deviance?

A
  • Inevitable in all societies. We experience life differently and have different demands on us, so it’s impossible to expect everyone to have the same values and morals.
  • Beneficial in small amount. Signs of a healthy society, just as a fever shows a strong immune system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does Durkheim say that Crime and Deviance are beneficial to society?

A
  • Strengthen collective values (we unite against extreme wrongs)
  • Enable social change (through forcing difficult conversations)
  • Act as a safety valve by ‘letting off steam’
  • Act as a warning device
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Merton believe about the functions of

Crime and Deviance?

A

It’s caused by strain and anomie. These lead to status frustration, where people feel motivated to break society’s rules because it seems impossible to be successful within their limits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Merton say were the 4 reactions to strain?

A
  • Innovation: find new illegal/immoral ways to reach an accepted goal
  • Conformity: accept limited means and work within the law to achieve an accepted goal
  • Ritualism: accept limited means and abandon hope of reaching accepted goals
  • Rebellion: reject legal means and abandon agreed and accepted goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does Cohen’s (1971) Subcultural Theory explain C&D?

A
  • Some people can’t get what they want or need from legal or respected means. Reject majority culture and form their own subcultures which meet their needs better and improve self-esteem
  • Subcultures have their own rules so members build self esteem they couldn’t get in normal life. Explains why many criminals carry on offending and get worse over the course of their life.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a Delinquent subculture?

A

Groups of people who feel status frustration and deal with it by becoming criminal and/or deviant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Status Frustration?

A

Feeling that you’re powerless and not well-respected because you’re unsuccessful and are denied status (e.g. perform badly at work so never get a promotion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Cloward & Ohlin’s (1960) subcultural theory explain C&D?

A

Look at working class subcultures. They felt ‘delinquent’ was too broad for these people, who were under extra strain and even less respected in a capitalist society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were Cloward and Ohlin’s three delinquent subculture types?

A
  • Criminal subcultures: commit utilitarian crimes to get money or status
  • Conflict subcultures: commit aggressive crimes towards those who are seen to represent their oppression
  • Retreatist subcultures: failed in ‘normal’ society and have also been rejected by other subcultures. They become deviants and suffer. (e.g. addicts, prostitution)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are is Hirschi’s (1969) Social Bond Theory ?

A

Believes social order relies on socialisation and a strong value consensus, like Durkheim. Noted other structural theories only explained why a small majority of people are driven towards crime, and his theory is about what prevents most people being criminal or deviant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were Hirschi’s four social bonds?

A
  • Belief > e.g. shared political beliefs/ religion
  • Commitment > e.g. raising a family and supporting work
  • Involvement > e.g. keeping busy with clubs that link you to others
  • Attachment > e.g. feeling as though you have a stake in the community
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do traditional Marxists explain crime and deviance?

A

Believe structural inequality leads to resentment, and ultimately causes conflict that breaks the value consensus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Marxist principles applied to crime and deviance

A
  • Capitalist society is criminogenic: Capitalist society is criminogenic
  • Laws reflect ruling-class ideology : the law is made by the ruling class so therefore it will reflect their interests above all others. Crime is ideologically constructed to demonise the working class
  • Scapegoating : where the system does punish someone from the ruling class, it’s only done to prevent a backlash
  • Selective Law Enforcement: the law is interpreted differently depending on who is accused of breaking it
18
Q

How do Neo-Marxists explain crime and deviance?

A

Remove structural elements from traditional Marxism but retain the conflict message. Say working class criminals are victims of the system but still blame them for choosing to turn to crime rather than calling the system ‘criminogenic’. Their founding theory was called ‘New Criminology’.

19
Q

What is the Neo-Marxist theory of ‘New Criminology’ ?

A

The ruling class is hegemonic (power-hungry) and elites use the media to give unbalanced views that make their natural enemies (the working class) look guilty. Legitimises their cruel actions and makes society reliant on their knowledge.

20
Q

What is Moral Panic?

A

Whipping up a storm in the media to demonise people who threaten you or to distract everyone from your criminal actions. This can allow a change of political agenda that benefits the ruling class.

21
Q

How do Labelling Theorists explain crime?

A

Say some people are demonised by society, causing them to internalise bad ideas about themselves. They develop poor self-esteem and lash out, supporting a self-fulfilling prophecy.

22
Q

What are the main ideas of Labelling Theorists?

A
  • Power relationships: the ‘deviant’ label is almost always given by a powerful person to a weak person
  • Selective law enforcement: labelling affects treatment of people doing wrong.
  • Deviancy Amplification: bad labels make others treat criminals badly. This makes them resentful and makes their actions more serious/aggressive in a ‘deviancy amplification spiral’
  • Moral entrepreneurs: people or organisations that can apply powerful labels
23
Q

What are the two types of deviant or criminal labels?

A
  1. Primary Deviance: acts seen as a ‘one off’ or mistake (short term label)
  2. Secondary Deviance: acts seen to indicate bad character (permanent label). Amplified by hostile treatment of the individual leading them to acquire a ‘master status’. They are a ‘criminal’ rather than just someone who has committed crimes.
24
Q

How do Feminists explain crime and deviance?

A

Focus in women’s experience of crime and Criminal Justice System. Argue women are driven to C&D for different reasons than men, and that the CJS deals with them poorly by ignoring their differences

25
Q

What did Heidensohn (2012) believe about crime, and the differences between men and women?

A
  • We have a ‘collective amnesia’ on female crime and deviance. Stereotypes means women are ignored
  • There’s been ‘neglect and distortion’ of women’s role in crime, both as criminals and victims
  • Society and the CJS are still too patriarchal and this prevents productive change. Research and policy are both by men and for men.
  • Sociology fails female criminals and victims with its ‘malestream’ composition
26
Q

What issues did Heidensohn (1996) identify with study of C&D?

A
  • Academics/researchers are mostly men
  • Male researchers tend to identify with ‘working class rogues’. Leads to macho attitude towards female crime and deviance
  • Female crime is harder to study as it tends to be on a smaller scale and less violent. Female crime is often hidden which were named ‘hidden offenders’, which account for 2/3 of female crime.
27
Q

How have Feminist Sociologists contributed to study of C&D?

A
  • Making a case for focus on women’s experience
  • Adapting male theories and making new ones to explain female C&D
  • Highlighting victimisation of women in research
  • Challenging lenient treatment of female offenders compared to male in the CJS; letting them off is denying them rehabilitation
28
Q

What are Realist Theorists?

A

Perspective that cares about practicalities rather than ethics. Focus on material evidence and consequences rather than moral responsibility and ethical consideration. In C&D, they want to focus on data and evidence based concerns to explain and solve C&D. Can be towards both the right and left of the political spectrum

29
Q

What do Left Realists believe about the explanations for crime?

A

Aimed to remove abstract conflict ideas from Marxist and NM theories to give a more concrete understanding. Issues with other left-wing theories

  • Tend to celebrate working class ceviants as revolutionary heroes. Behaviour shouldn’t be romanticised
  • Research suggests most people don’t care about white collar or corporate crime.
30
Q

What did Lea & Young (LR theory) suggest as three explanations for crime?

A
  • Relative Deprivation: increasing difference in wealth and opportunity makes many people resentful and angry
  • Marginalisation: Poor, ethnic minority, WC and low-education people feel disconnected from society and feel no incentive to follow rules. Easily angry about being forgotten
  • Subcultures: inequality and lack of opportunity creates status frustration for many young people.
31
Q

What did Young’s (2003) ‘Bulimic Society’ say about wider issues leading to status frustration? (LR Theory)

A
  • Says modern societies are saturated with media influence. We’re all forced to binge information and advertising. Adverts and celebrities show ‘ideals’ most of us will never achieve and this leads to frustration
  • When people realise they can’t satisfy the capitalist ideal, they purge their frustrations; becoming aggressive, antisocial and/or deviant
32
Q

What did Young say was responsible for relative deprivation?

A
  • Individualist Cultures: capitalism, humanism and identity politics all focus on the self above others. Weakens bonds with society
  • Loss of informal control: families are spreading out as the young can’t afford to live where they grew up.
  • Economic/financial inequality: gap from richest to poorest in the UK has increased more than 400% since 1974. Less equal society leads to more depression, resentment and anger.
33
Q

What did Lea and Young’s ‘Square of Crime’ suggest were four elements that interact to produce C&D?

A
  • Structural and Formal control factors: actions of official control agencies
  • Public and Informal control factors: reactions of communities to C&D
  • Role of Victims: why do some people become victims? will they report anything?
  • Role of Offenders: does the offender feel guilt? are they acting selfishly or do they have no choice?
34
Q

What do Right Realists say about crime and deviance?

A

Developed from New Right. Believe that criminals and deviants are responsible for their actions and freely choose to do them. This means they tend to favour harsh punishment and want to make examples of offenders to deter others from making poor choices.

35
Q

What are the main common ideas of Right Realists in relation to crime and deviance?

A
  • Value consensus and objective morality underpin society: society only functions when there is strong social order
  • All people are selfish: can’t trust individuals to make good choices if they can get away with crime.
  • Community control: if gov exerts enough control, then crime will decrease. Can embed desired behaviours in education and policy for more control.
  • Rational Choice Theory: know what they’re doing is wrong and do it regardless
  • Opportunity Theory: people choose to commit crime only when there’s a good opportunity.
  • Underclass: whole layer of society occupied by lazy, deviant and irresponsible people/
  • Crime will always exist: crime is a natural part of society’s structure.
36
Q

How do Postmodernists’s view society?

A

Based on the dialectic principle. IDea we can find the ‘truth’ by gathering experts and getting them to argue their points. Winning points from each are likely to form to combine truth.

37
Q

What types of Postmodernist are there?

A
  • Dialectic Materialists: we can use concrete observations of events and structural phenomena to discuss and argue about society
  • Dialectic Idealism: structures are irrelevant because they only reflect social constructions and the value consensus, si we can only meaningfully argue about ideas and individual experiences.
38
Q

How do Postmodernists explain Crime and Deviance?

A

Take a Dialectic IDealist approach, which they call ‘Transgressive Criminology’ (Henry and Milanovic 1996). Their core belief is that inequality and exploitation through uneven power dynamics are responsible for society’s problems. Transgressive criminology is all about the ‘harms’ that crime causes and is caused by.

39
Q

What are the two ‘harms’ mentioned in ‘Transgressive Criminology’ ?

A
  • Harms of Reduction: using your power to cause immediate harm to a victim
  • Harms of Repression: using your power to restrict or disrupt others progress.
40
Q

Why do Postmodernists think individuals commit crime?

A

Katz (2008): crime can’t be studied by looking at social trends bc in modern, global society there is no structure and everythings constantly changing. By the time you understand it, it changes. We can only look at individuals
Lyng (2005): crime is ‘seductive’. It is exciting and criminals often do it for the thrills. Wanted to be seen as ‘living on the edge’. Known as ‘Edgework’, making a career of it.