Criminal Flashcards

(106 cards)

1
Q

Only case of merger?

A

Solicitation/Attempt and completed crime merge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Multiple punishments for same crime?

A

2+ statutorily defined offenses

specifically intended by legislature to carry separate punishments, even when they are from the same crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Elements of Omission Crime

A

(1) Legal duty to act (statute, contract, status relationship, voluntary assumption of care; creation of peril)
(2) Knowledge of facts giving rise to duty
(3) Reasonably possible to perform duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MR: Specific intent
NY - “Intent”
[desire to act and achieve specific result]

A

Assault, murder 1;
Larceny, Embezzlement, false pretenses, robbery, forgery, Burglary
Solicitation, conspiracy, attempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MR: Malice
NY - “Recklessness”
[Intentional OR reckless disregard of obvious risk]

A

Murder, arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MR: General intent
NY - “Negligence”
[Generally aware of factors - no intent for specific result]

A

Battery, forcible rape, false imprisonment, kidnapping

“fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MR: Strict

[No mental state]

A

Public welfare, statutory rape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

NY mens rea levels

A

Intent: Desire to achieve
Knowledge: Practically certain result
Recklessness: Consciously disregards known risk
Negligence: Should have been aware

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Causation?

A

Actual (but for)
AND
Proximate (no intervening cause)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Concurrence?

A

Has mental state at same time as act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Battery - CL

A

Unlawful application of force to another
Resulting in injury or offensive touching
MR: General intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Assault - CL

A

Attempted battery
OR
Intentional creation of reasonable apprehension
MR: Specific intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Assault - NY

A

Intentionally causing physical injury to another

offensive touching not enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attempted assault - NY

A

“Intent” to cause injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Menacing - NY

A

Creation of reasonable apprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Degrees of assault - NY

A

1st - with weapon
* 2nd - Intentionally causing SERIOUS physical injury
3rd - NON-serious injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Homicide - until when can death occur?

A

CL (old): 1y+1d

NY and MAJ: any time!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Murder - elements

A

Causing death with malice aforethought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

“Malice aforethought” as MR for murder?

A

Intent to kill
Intent to inflict serious bodily harm
Extreme recklessness / indifference to human life
Intentional inherently dangerous felony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“Intent to kill”

A

Weapon = inference of intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Transferred intent to kill - limitation?

A

Only for completed crime (no attempted murder if victim doesn’t die)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

“Intentional inherently dangerous felony” - limits?

A
Guilty of felony.
Felony independent of killing (no merger, not battery)
During felony or immediate flight
Foreseeability!
Victim not co-felon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Is escape an inherently dangerous felony?

A

Only in NY.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Co-felons

A

All guilty by vicarious liability. Even when 3rd party bystander kills.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
NY non-slayer defense - conditions
Did not kill Had no deadly weapon Had no reason to believe co-felon had deadly weapon Had no reason to believe co-felons would do anything resulting in death
26
Murder - degrees - majority
1st - premeditation + deliberation | 2nd - everything else
27
Murder - degrees - NY
1st - Intent to kill + >18 + Aggravating factor (killed cop, murder for hire, felony murder + intentional killing, witness intimidation, multiple victims) 2nd - Intentional killing OR highly reckless murder OR felony murder (with intention to kill, no co-felon)
28
"Highly reckless murder" (2nd NY)
Demonstrating depraved indifference to human life, recklessly engages in conduct that creates a grave risk of death and thereby causes death of another
29
Voluntary manslaughter - CL
Intentional killing in the heat of passion with adequate provocation
30
"Adequate provocation" for CL manslaughter?
Objectively adequate for sudden/intense reaction Subjectively provoked Objectively - no time to cool off Subjectively - did not cool off *NY - see 1st manslaiughter / Extreme Emotional Disturbance
31
Involuntary manslaughter - CL
Killing with criminal negligence OR Killing during crime (other than felony murder)
32
Manslaughter 1 - NY
Intentional killing under influence of reasonable and extreme emotional disturbance (like CL voluntary manslaughter) OR Intent to cause serious physical injury
33
Manslaughter 2 - NY
Recklessness | aware of and consciously disregards substantial and unjustifiable risk of death
34
Criminally negligent homicide - NY
Criminal negligence | like CL involuntary manslaughter
35
Aggravated homicide - NY
Police officer / | >18 kills <14 in cruel/wanton manner
36
Felony murder in NY - intentional/accidental distinction:
Intentional - Murder 1 Accidental - Murder 2 [Can convict even if acquitted of underlying felony, so long as there is evidence of the felony!]
37
List of all homicide crimes in NY
``` Aggravated homicide Murder 1 (intent + aggravation) Murder 2 (intent) Man 1 (Intent + EED / intent to injure) Man 2 (recklessness) Criminal negligence homicide ```
38
False imprisonment - CL
Unlawful confinement of person without consent which interferes substantially with victim's liberty (no alternative routes). MR - general intent
39
Unlawful imprisonment - NY
2nd - unlawful restraining without consent MR: Knowledge that unlawful [legal mistake is a defense!] 1st - same plus risk of serious injury
40
Kidnapping - CL
False imprisonment + moving the victim or concealing in secret place MR: General intent
41
Kidnapping - NY
2nd - abducting | 1st - plus ransom OR >12hr restraint with intent to rape/injure/rob OR death of victim
42
Forcible rape
Sexual intercourse w/o consent by force / threat of force / when unconscious MR: General intent
43
Statutory rape - MR distinction?
NY, majority: strict | MPC: except reasonable mistake
44
Larceny - CL
Trespassory taking and carrying away the personal property of another with intent to permanently retain property (TTCPAIP)
45
Larceny + intent to return
Defense!
46
Erroneous takings rule in larceny
Under claim of right - even erroneous ---- not larceny!
47
Concurrence rule. | EXCL Continuing trespass in larceny
** Exception to concurrence rule if he decides to steal while in unlawful possession
48
Embezzlement - CL
``` Fraudulent conversion of personal property of another when already in LAWFUL POSSESSION MR: specific intent to defraud "Possession" - authority to exercise discretion, not mere custody ```
49
False pretenses - CL
Obtaining TITLE to another's property by intentional FALSE STATEMENT MR: Intent to defraud
50
Larceny by trick - CL
Obtains CUSTODY by intentional FALSE STATEMENT | not ownership, that would be false pretenses
51
Robbery - CL
Taking of personal property from another's person/presence by force or threat of immediate injury (not begging, lying) MR:with intent to permanently deprive (not pickpocket) (not written threat, blackmail, extortion)
52
Forgery - CL
Making/altering a writing so that it is false MR: with intent to defraud
53
Theft crimes in NY
Only larceny and robbery (larceny is a catch-all)
54
Larceny NY degrees
``` 1st -- $1m 2nd -- $50k or extortion involving physical injury * 3rd -- $3k or ATM 4th -- $1k, public records, etc. "Petit" - any ```
55
Larceny NY includes these crimes
Everything except robbery: Larceny by trespassory taking, embezzlement, false pretenses, larceny by trick, issuing bad check to obtain property, extortion?
56
Robbery - NY - degrees
3rd - forcible stealing 2nd - ?aided by another / victim injured / car stolen / unloaded firearm 1st - ? victim seriously injured / uses or displays loaded firearm
57
Burglary - CL | **NARROW**
Breaking and entering (not open window, not with permission) dwelling of another (someone regularly sleeps there) at night with intent to commit felony inside MR: Specific intent when entering (not after he is inside already!)
58
Burglary - NY | **BROAD**
``` Entering/remaining in building unlawfully with intent to commit any crime inside [no concurrence, no breaking, no dwelling, no nighttime, any crime not just felony] ```
59
Burglary - NY - degrees
3rd - (above) 2nd - dwelling / injury / weapon 1st - Perp knows it is a dwelling PLUS injured / weapon
60
Arson - CL
Malicious burning of building (material wasting of building itself, not just scorching, not just contents) MR: Malice
61
Arson - NY - degrees
4th - Reckless damage by intentionally starting fire 3rd - Intentional damage 2nd - Intentional + knows or should know someone is inside or reasonably possible 1st - all that plus incendiary/explosive
62
Possession of contraband
Possession = control for period sufficient for opportunity to terminate control Constructive possession = close enough to exercise dominion + control MR: Knowledge of possession and character of item
63
Receipt of stolen property
Receiving possession and control of stolen personal property MR: Knowledge that object was OBTAINED CRIMINALLY with intent to permanently deprive owner of interest. [CHECK STATUS WHEN RECEIVED, IF ALREADY RECOVERED BY POLICE, MAYBE WE ONLY HAVE AN ATTEMPT]
64
Criminal possession of stolen property - NY
Must realy be stolen
65
MR for accomplice liability - NY/MBE
MBE: intent that crime be committed - NOT INCLUDING negligence/recklessness NY: intent to aid perp's conduct AND mental state for crime - INCLUDES negligence and recklessness!
66
Mere knowledge = accomplice?
MBE: No. NY: Knowledge = crime of "criminal facilitation" (doesn't reach accomplice level)
67
Accomplice withdrawal defense - NY/MBE
MBE Encourager - repudiates before crime committed Aider - must neutralize or prevent crime (call cops) NY [requires more effort] Renunciation + withraws prior to commission + substantial effort to prevent
68
Accessory after the fact
Can be convicted of "accessory" crime, not principal crime. Helps perp with knowledge of crime with intent to help AVOID ARREST/CONVICTION NY - "hindering prosecution" (There is also an "accessory before the crime" who is not a principal if not present at the crime itself)
69
Inchoate offenses?
Solicitation Conspiracy Attempt
70
Solicitation - elements
``` Asking someone to commit crime with intent that it be committed MR: Specific intent [Not necessary to complete crime] [NY has 5 degrees re ages and whether crime is a felony] ```
71
Conspiracy - elements
Agreement and overt act [anything, even preparatory] in furtherance of crime MR: Specific intent: (1) for agreement - "concert of action" + (2) Accomplish objectives of conspiracy [NY has 6 degrees re ages and type of crime]
72
How many guilty minds for conspiracy?
CL: Bilateral - 2! | NY/MPC: Unilateral - only 1 - even when others are acquitted or undercover cops
73
Conspiracy - when crime itself needs >1
NY: Need n+1 | "Wharton rule"
74
Vicarious liability for co-conspirator crimes?
Furtherance of conspiracy objectives; foreseeable results; [NY non-participating co-conspiror not liable]
75
Attempt - elements?
Overt act beyond preparation (much more than conspiracy) CL/NY - "dangerously close" MPC/maj: substantial step towards commission, which strongly corroborates crim. Purpose MR: Intent to commit crime! (Recklessness, negligence, felony murder - not enough!!)
76
Attempt - factual impossibility defense?
Not a defense
77
Attempt - legal impossibility defense? | [When completion of intended acts would not produce crime, but perp thought he would -- "shooting stuffed deer"]
CL: Defense! NY: Not a defense
78
Inchoate withdrawal defense - NY/MBE
** MBE: Usually not a defence. Elements are fulfilled early. Might relieve vicarious liability for co-conspirators' actions but not for crime of conspiracy. NY: Only completely renounced + prevented commission!
79
Merger rule for solicitation - NY/MBE
MBE: Merges NY: Doesn't merge!
80
Merger rule for attempt - NY/MBE
Always merges
81
Merger rule for conspiracy - NY/MBE
NEVER merges
82
Insanity defense - general requirement | [Need to know the following separate tests]
Must have "mental disease of defect"
83
Insanity defense - M'Naughten
"DOESN'T KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG" Cognitive: Didn't know action was WRONG Didn't understand NATURE of conduct
84
Insanity defense - irresistable impulse
Unable to control actions, or conform actions to law
85
Insanity defense - Durham / New Hampshire
"BUT FOR ILLNESS, WOULDN'T HAVE COMMITTED" Broad! Crime was product of mental illness
86
Insanity defense - MPC
"COMBINATION M'NAUGHTEN + IRRESISTABLE" (COGNITIVE + VOLITIONAL) As a result of mental disease/defect: Lacked substantial capacity to either (a) Appreciate the criminality of conduct [M'Naughten] OR (b) conform to requirement of law [Irresistable impulse]
87
Insanity defense - NY
Lacked substantial capacity to know and appreciate EITHER (a) nature and consequences of conduct (b) that conduct was wrong
88
Voluntary intoxication - defense to which MR?
CL/MBE: Specific intent only | NY: "Intent" "Knowledge"
89
Infancy defense - CL
14+ - prosecution allowed
90
Infancy defense - NY
<13 Juvie prosecution only 13 Adult for Murder 2 14-15 Adult for serious crimes against person or property 16+ Adult for any crime
91
Mistake defense?
Mistake of law - NEVER unless knowledge of law is element | Only mistake of fact
92
CL mistake of fact
REASONABLE MISTAKE IS DEFENSE FOR EVERYTHING EXCEPT STRICT Specific intent - any mistake of fact Malice, general intent - reasonable mistake only Strict liability - no defense
93
NY mistake of fact
WHEN REQUIRED MENTAL STATE IS NEGATED REASONABLE MISTAKE IS DEFENSE FOR EVERYTHING EXCEPT STRICT Intent/knowledge/recklessness - any mistake Negligence - reasonable mistake only Strict - no defense
94
Self defense - use of non-deadly force
Reasonably necessary to protect against immediate use of unlawful force NY: Not if he provoked)
95
Self defense - use of deadly force
Faces imminent threat | of death of serious injury
96
Initial aggressor use of deadly force in self defense?
No defense. EXC1: withdraws and "communicates withdrawal" EXC2: victim escalates non-deadly fight to deadly fight (+NY withdraws as well)
97
Retreat required before use of deadly force?
MBE: Not required. NY: Yes EXCEPT if he cannot retreat in complete safety / at home (castle exception) / officer / believes person is committed kidnapping, rape, burglury.
98
Mistake re need to use force?
Reasonable mistake - defense. Unreasonable: NY/maj. - no defense. MPC - mitigates liability - "imperfect self defense"
99
Use of force to prevent crime
Non-deadly - to prevent "serious breach of peace" | Deadly - "to prevent felony risking human life"
100
Defense of others
Resonable belief that other person has legal right to his own defense. "Reasonable appearance"
101
Deadly force in defense of property?
No, except: In dwelling + tumultuous entry + reasonable belief that necessary to prevent personal attack [not really defense of property anymore]
102
Non-deadly force to resist arrest
Maj. - to resist unlwaful arrest | NY - only to resist excessive force
103
"Necessity defense"
Reasonable belief that force necessary to prevent greater harm. Objective test only! Good faith belief NOT sufficient. Doesn't apply: (a) Deadly force in protecting property (b) Defendant at fault in creating "choice of evils situation"
104
Civilian making arrest?
Non-deadly force if crime actually committed person has reasonable grounds to believe he was the perp. Deadly force - only if actually guilty (not just belief)
105
Duress defense?
``` Coerced by threat of imminent death / serious injury to himself of close family MBE - not for homicide. NY - defense for homicide! ```
106
Entrapment defense?
[NOT USUALLY GOOD DEFENSE ON MBE] Criminal design originated with government AND D not predisposed to commit (eg. no crim record)