DDA

Question 1

Disability DIscrimiantion Act

Answer 1

Australia upholds The Disability Discrimination Act to a good extent but needs could use further refinement. The Disability Discrimination Act (1992) makes it unlawful to discriminate against a person because of their disability.

Question 2

Protects

Answer 2

It also protects people from discrimination because they are accompanied by an assistant, interpreter, trained animal or use equipment like a wheelchair.

Question 3

Sydney Olympics (2000)

Answer 3

During the 2000 Sydney Olympics, Graeme Maguire, a wheelchair user, attempted to attend the Sydney Olympics but faced significant accessibility issues.

Question 4

Accessibility

Answer 4

This included a lack a suitable seating, obstructed view and limited bathroom and transport facilities.

Question 5

HRC

Answer 5

The Human Right’s Commission ruled in Maguire’s favour and demonstrated how the Disability Act can be used to challenge systemic barriers in public facilities

Question 6

Flawed

Answer 6

However, the Disability Act is flawed, and some claims get ignored or dismissed. An example of this is Sklavos v Australia College of Dermatologists year. Dr Sklavos alleged the college failed to provide reasonable adjustments for his disability.

Question 7

Dismissed

Answer 7

The Federal Court dismissed his claim stating that the colleges actions weren’t directly motivated by his disability. It was criticized for weakening protections for people with disabilities.

Question 8

Therefore

Answer 8

Therefore, it is evident that although Australia does have the Disability Discrimination Act, they are still far behind where they need to be.