Development Flashcards
(32 cards)
Constructivism
knowledge is constructed through an interaction of:
what we already know and,
what we experience.
Assimilation
People use schemas to interpret experiences
Accomodation
Simultaneously use experiences to revise schemas
Piagets view of development
Gradually knowledge is constructed across time
Importance of play
- Children actively seek information to help them test and revise their schemas
- They play as a form of scientific discovery, to test and revise what they know about the world.
-As children test and revise their schemas
Sensorimotor (0-2)
-Use of sensory and motor schemas
Physical interactions with objects
Still developing:
Symbolic representation
Object permanence
Object Permanence
Understanding that objects continue to exist even when out of sight.
pre operational (2-6)
-Use of symbolic schemas
Language
Imagination
Still developing:
The ability to manage multiple schemas simultaneously and to mentally manipulate them.
Conservation
Perspective-taking (overcoming egocentrism)
Conservation
-Certain physical properties (e.g., volume, mass, and number) stay the same despite physical transformations.
-Children struggle to understand this because it requires them to think about events in many different ways at the same time.
Egocentrism
tendency to perceive the world only from one’s own point of view.
-Preoperational children fixate on one aspect of the problem (e.g., where the ball is).
Cannot mentally transform the ball to original location and take perspective of someone else (requires working with multiple schemas).
Concrete Operational (6 to 11)
Ability to flexibly manage and manipulate schemas.
Ability to categorize in many different ways, use rules, logic.
Still developing:
More abstract, hypothetical, and systematic reasoning
Formal Operational (12 to . . .)
Use of abstract and hypothetical, and systematic thought.
Attachment
Special relationship between human infants and their caregivers. “attachment” to describe this first relationship
Attachment provides physical security (Safety, shelter, food) and psychological safety (predictable, reliable, secure).
“Cupboard” theory
Parents start out as a neutral stimulus that becomes associated with the unconditioned stimulus of food.
Contact/comfort (Harlow studies)
-Much of what Harlow saw in monkeys can be seen in humans as well, especially using the parent as a secure base from which to explore, and to return when things seem unsafe. That psychological security really empowers you to get out and learn.
-We believe that contact comfort has long served the animal kingdom as a motivating agent for affectional responses.
The contact comfort concept from Harry Harlow’s studies on rhesus monkeys shows that attachment is primarily formed through physical comfort and emotional security, not just feeding or nourishment.
Securely attached
-60% of babies
-Treat the attachment figure as a source of security and safety.
Secure base: Explores when mother is present
Separation: Upset when mother leaves
Reunion: Calms down and greets mother positively when she returns
Insecurely attached ( avoidant)
- 20% of babies
-Treat the attachment figure as irrelevant
Secure base: Uninterested in exploring the strange environment
Separation: Shows little distress when mother leaves
Reunion: Shows little interest when mother returns
Insecurely attached:
Resistant/Ambivalent/Anxious
-15% of babies
-Treat the attachment figure as unreliable source of safety
Secure base: Reluctant to explore, anxious
Separation: Very upset when mother leaves
Reunion: Continues to be upset when mother returns and may seek but then reject contact
Disorganized/Disoriented
So:
Secure base: Not consistent in behaviors
Separation: No consistent way of coping
Reunion: often appear dazed or disoriented
why do attachment styles matter
Basic trust: sense of world as predictable and reliable
Social and intellectual skills
Emotional stability
Adult relationships, including attachment to partners, even in late life.
Can change over time and with relationships
Critisism of attachment styles
-Much of research done in US, predominately White (European American) mothers and children
-The general point about importance of attachments and secure base does seem to apply cross-culturally
-What is considered “insecure” (such as very upset when caregiver leaves) might be “secure” in other contexts
example: Co-sleeping
Ecological Systems Theory/ Bioecological Model
To understand a child’s development we must understand their environment and interactions with their environment
Microsystems
Things child has direct contact with (immediate environment)
Teachers, caregivers, peers in schools
Mesosystem
Interactions between a child’s microsystems. Microsystems do not function independently, but are interconnected and assert influence upon one another
-E.g., Interaction between teacher and parents