Diets to assist with training Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

training intensity with sprint

A

all out (500W)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

training intensity with endurance

A

65% VO2 peak (150W)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

exercise protocol with sprint

A

30s, 4-6, 4min recovery, 3x a week

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

exercise protocol with endurance

A

40-60min, 5x a week

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

weekly exercise time with sprint

A

10mins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

weekly exercise time with endurance

A

4.5h

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

weekly training time with sprint

A

1.5h

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

weekly training time with endurance

A

4.5h

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

weekly training volume with sprint

A

225kJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

weekly training volume with endurance

A

2250kJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

comparison of MICT, SIT and NTC - Gillen (2016)

A

25 sedentary men

3 x 20 all out sprints

2 min recovery between each one

Or moderate 45mins continuous activity

Control

12 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SIT effectively increases aerobic capacity (Gillen, 2016)

A

Moderate and sprint = improvement in aerobic capacity - VO2 peak

no change with control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

SIT effectively improved insulin sensitivity (Gillen, 2016)

A

improved CSI with moderate and sprint

reduced with control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SIT effectively increased mitochondrial enzymes (Gillen, 2016)

A

improved max activity of citrate synthase with moderate and sprint

no change with control

some training adaptations with sprint and endurance type training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

train low, compete high

A

Chronically low CHO diet - stress body

Twice daily training - 2nd training - depleted carb state

Training after overnight fast

Prolonged training without ingestion - carb depleted

Withhold CHO in recovery - don’t recover fully - haven’t replenished glycogen stores to full capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

so HIT/SIT brilliant and so is nutrition

A

higher adaptation with more nutrition

17
Q

nutritional interventions

A

buffers

caffeine

creatine

beta-alanine

18
Q

low CHO causes bigger adaptations in oxidative enzymes (Morton, 2009)

A

greater SDH activity with low carb

19
Q

CHO manip and HIT (Morton, 2009)

A

2 sessions per day - 1st - after fed - carb - 2nd session provided with glucose

2nd session with just water with placebo

4 bouts of training a week

20
Q

CHO availability: performance not influenced (Morton, 2009)

A

or exercise tolerance

no differences in TTE/performance with low carb

21
Q

HIIT and low carb also shown to improve performance (Cochran, 2015)

A

Increase in mean power output with low carb

improvement in repeated sprints with low carb

22
Q

CHO manipulation strategies

A

chronically low CHO diet

train low, compete high

training after overnight fast

training after overnight fast and low carb support

withholding carb during recovery

23
Q

chronically low CHO diet benefits

A

increased fat oxidation

decreased GLUT-4

decreased performance

(not that great)

24
Q

train low, compete high benefits

A

increased fax oxidation

increased enzyme activity

increased muscle glycogen

maintained performance

25
training after overnight fast benefits
increased fat oxidation increased enzyme activity maintained performance (most common)
26
training after overnight fast and low carb support benefits
increased fat oxidation increased fat transporters maintained performance
27
withholding carb during recovery benefits
not tested limited evidence
28
CHO manipulation (Hulston, 2010)
*see slide*
29
self-selection = low power output (Hulston, 2010)
• Low - Power they could generate in HIT sessions lower - Glycogen depleted state - less power could be generated
30
Low = muscle TG usage despite more muscle glycogen (Hulson, 2010)
Low - less reliant on glycogen and more reliant on TG increase in muscle glycogen post training
31
low = increased proteins related to fat metabolism
greater CD36 and HAD with low
32
both groups had improved time trial (Hulston, 2010)
increased power output with low
33
bicarbonate effectiveness as a training aid (Edge et al., 2006)
3 weeks interval training at high intensity effort - ⇧ buffering inversely to pre training levels - ⇧ VO2 max - ⇧ LT - ⇧ Ex @ pre training VO2 max Time trial increased Outcome - Buffering occurred - Sig higher with bicarbonate buffer - Adaptations occurred - Increases in VO2 max, lactate threshold and time to exhaustion