Differential Achievement Flashcards
(78 cards)
Global Disparities - Social Class
-The Education Monitoring Report
found that 95% of 3-7 year olds were enrolled in pre-primary or primary school in Belarus compared to just 20% in Ethiopia, showing a disparity between developed and developing countries.
Global Disparities - Social Class
- Filmer
poverty is the most significant factor holding students back although ethnicity, gender and locality are factors which also influence educational opportunities. In Somalia the national average of students never attending school is 53% but amongst the “poorest children” in Somalia 89% have never attended school.
Global Disparities - Gender
United Nations
surveys of 61 developing countries show girls in the poorest households are excluded from education. In sub-Saharan Africa just 23% of girls complete primary education. In Yemen 92% of the poorest girls do not complete primary education in comparison to 47% of boys. In the democratic republic of Congo, 44% of girls have never been to school compared to 17%.
Global Disparities - Gender
North
studied education in Afghanistan. There are 3.16 girls in education in comparison to 5.16 million boys. 4.2 million children get no education in Afghanistan and 60% of them are girls.
Global Disparities - Gender
UNESCO
reasons for poorer countries having restricted opportunities for girls are constraints within families as girls are expected to take their roles within the domestic sphere, constraints within society as there are pressures of early marriages for girls and the threat of beliefs may discourage donation for gilrs
UK Pattern and Trends - Social Class
1.
children from middle class families on average perform better than working class children. The class gap grows wider as children get older. Middle class children do better at GCSEs, stay longer in full time education and take most university places. For children on FSM only 53.5% make expected progress to KS2 and are disproportionately likely to be in care or have SEN and are more likely to be unable to read when they reach school. They were also less likely to be placed in lower sets.
UK Patterns and Trends - Social Class
2. Department for Education 2019
less than 2.6% of grammar school pupils are FSM, compared to 13.4% in other schools. Less than 33% FSM will achieve 5 or more grade 4+ compared to 75% of better off students, less than 25% FSM will attend university, compared to 43% of the general population
UK Patterns and Trends
2. Attainment 8
measures a student’s average grade across 8 subjects based on anything above a grade 5 : FSM 34.45%, those not eligible for FSM 48.3%
UK Patterns and Trends - Gender
1. Starting School
2013 Teacher assessments showed that girls were out performing boys in literacy, language and maths. Key stage 1-3: girls continue to do better than boys especially in English, key stage 4; the average gap KS4 stands about 10 points but the gap is increasing. KS5: the gap at A level is much narrower than at GCSE but girls still outperform boys even in the so called ‘boys subjects’ such as maths and science
UK Patterns and Trends
2. Vocational Education
although boys are more likely to take a vocational qualification than girls, girls are still more likely to receive a distinction.
UK Patterns and Trends
3.
In 2019, 71.9% of female students achieved a C/4 grade or higher in comparison to 62.9% of male students who achieved a C/4 grade or higher in the UK. Females continue to outperform males at both 7/A boundary (21.1% vs 17.6%) and the 4/C boundary although the gap has narrowed at the 4/C boundary since last year. It continues to widen but the gap begins to narrow in the sciences and maths
UK Patterns and Trends
1. DfES (2007)
only 24% of white male pupils who were on FSM gained 5 A*C grades. White and Asian pupils on average achieve higher than black pupils
UK Patterns and Trends
2. Hastings
White pupils male less progress between the ages of 11-16 years old compared to black or Asian pupils. If current trends continue then white pupils will become the lowest performing ethnic group in the UK. Within every ethnic group middle class pupils do better than working class pupils
UK Patterns and Trends
3. Attainment 8
measures a student’s average grade across 8 subjects based on anything above a grade 5- white British 46.1%, black Caribbean 39.6%
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTOR
Labelling/Interactionist approaches/Structural
-Becker
interviewed 60 Chicago high school teachers and found that teachers see middle class pupils as closest to the ideal pupil in terms of performance, conduct, appearance and attitude. Working class students were far from this ideal. The labels applied by teachers to pupils shape the nature and quality of the interaction between pupil and teacher. Creates a self-fulfilling prophecy and therefore working class students may be labelled as non-achievers or deviant which may then lead to their lack of achievement.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTOR
Labelling/Interactionist approaches/Structural
- Rosenthal and Jacobson
pygmalion effect: an experiment to demonstrate whether or not self fulfilling prophecy would occur. They created a fake text for students to show which pupils were ‘spurters’ (those who were gifted and would naturally progress quicker than other members of the class) l. Once the test was complete, they picked 20% at random that they labelled as the ‘sputters’ and told the teachers. Crucially the teachers were unaware that this was made up. The results showed that 47% of those identified made major progress. Teachers would spend more time with those students they would offer more help and give more feedback and verbally have higher expectations. This demonstrates teachers’ reactions to those who were labelled as likely to achieve a positive self fulfilling prophecy.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTOR
Labelling/Interactionist approaches/Structural
-Keddie
researched streaming where students are grouped based on ability. They found that teacher expectations were less for those in the bottom streams, undermining the quality of teaching. It had a profound effect upon teacher attitude and practice. A streamers were trusted to work with the minimum of supervision and to make a contribution to class discussion. C streamers were in need of constant social control and rarely left on their own. Many studies also make the link between streaming and the development of anti-school subcultures. These students were found to live down to labels and also did not receive the best teaching practices due to teacher attitudes and effort.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTOR
Labelling/Interactionist approaches/Structural
-Hargreaves
compared 2 streams of boys and found that selection of streams was closely related to behaviour. The more the top streaks were rewarded for behaviour they more they conformed to this and achieved well. The lower stream boys felt unable to achieve high subcultures which promoted anti-school and anti-attainment attitudes. Processes that occurred between the labelling of teachers about students were speculation, working hypothesis where teachers develop theories about the type of the type of student based on observing the student. Stabilisation where the teacher feels they know the student and interpret everything about them based on their judgements and interactions.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTORS
Pupil Subcultures
Structural
-Hargreaves
compared 2 streams of boys and found that selection of streams was closely related to behaviour. The more the top streaks were rewarded for behaviour they more they conformed to this and achieved well. The lower stream boys felt unable to achieve high subcultures which promoted anti-school and anti-attainment attitudes. Processes that occurred between the labelling of teachers about students were speculation, working hypotheses where teachers develop theories about the type of the type of student based on observing the student. Stabilisation where the teacher feels they know the student and interpret everything about them based on their judgements and interactions.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTORS
Pupil Subcultures
Structural
-Mac an Ghail
macho lads: perform physical, manual labour work which became a way to shape their working class identity but de-industrialisation led them macho lads to face a crisis of masculinity as the job market changed to suit the lifestyles of women and the working class boys did not have the academic qualifications needed in order to move into new working class job roles.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
INSIDE FACTORS
Pupil Subcultures
Structural
-Willis
12 working class lads had little interest in academic work and proffered to amuse themselves through deviant behaviour as. They saw manual work as superior to mental work.. they were influenced by their home background which led to anti-school subcultures and and also the counter—school subculture as they replicated the behaviour learnt from school to entertain themselves in typically boring jobs.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
OUTSIDE FACTORS
Theoretical/Biological
-Eysenck
IQ is largely inherited - 60-80% of intelligence is genetically based. What children take out of school is proportional to what they bring into school in terms of IQ. class differences in intelligence largely account for class differences in educational attainment
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
OUTSIDE FACTORS
Theoretical/Biological
-Hernstein and Jensen (New Right)
between 60-80% if intelligence is genetically based. Class differences in intelligence is largely account for class differences in educational attainment.
EXPLAINING SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN ACHIEVEMENT
OUTSIDE FACTORS
Material (Money) - Structural
-Smith and Noble
Financial barriers to learning’ due to parents’ low income. Parents are unable to afford school uniforms, transport, textbooks, etc and are less likely to have a computer/desk/homework area. Pupils are more likely to work part time or care for younger siblings if parents do shift work.