documents (secondary) Flashcards

1
Q

what are documents

A

secondary data created by individuals, groups and organisations which can be analysed. they include: written text, images, audio and video.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is content analysis

A

analysis of documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the different types of documents

A

personal documents
public documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are personal documents

A

letters, diaries, memoirs, autobiographies, notes and photo collections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are public documents

A

reports from government, charities and businesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is thematic content analysis

A

analysis of qualitative research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is systematic content analysis

A

objective and quantitative description of quantitative research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what data do documents contain

A

mainly qualitative data that expresses the beliefs and meanings held by individuals and organisations.
however, some contain statistical data as well e.g. the Black Report into health inequalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when is a document authentic

A

if the document is true and free from error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when is a document credible

A

if the document is believable with a sincere author

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when is a document representative

A

if evidence is typical and can be generalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

example of a document

A

Thomand and Znaniecki used public documents e.g. newspaper articles and personal documents e.g. letters to study migration and social change, whilst interested in people’s personal experiences of these events, and revealing the meanings of migrants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are Scott’s four tests of any document

A
  • authenticity
  • credibility
  • representativeness
  • meaning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what documents do positivists favour

A

public documents and systematic analysis:
- produced quantifiable, reliable data
- objectivity
- cause and effect relationships
- patterns can be generalised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what documents do interpretivists favour

A

personal documents and thematic analysis:
- authentic, as written without research in mind
- qualitative data gives insight to meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

advantages of historical documents

A
  • allow comparisons to be made with the past, to recognise change across time
  • no deception involved, as no participants
  • few interpersonal skills needed, as there is no face-to-face interaction
17
Q

disadvantages of historical documents

A
  • skills requires e.g. translating old language, interpreting numerical documents
  • difficult to judge authenticity of some documents, as they may not be what they claim to be
  • analysing data is down to subjective interpretation, so bias could influence validity
18
Q

advantages of personal documents

A
  • mostly written for personal purposes, so high validity gives a genuine insight into the life of the author, providing verstehen
  • few interpersonal skills needed
  • most are cheap, and save researcher time
19
Q

disadvantages of personal documents

A
  • some groups e.g. illiterate are unlikely to produce these documents, so will be unrepresented, whereas those with necessary skills will be over-represented
  • difficult to access e.g. diaries
  • certain documents require informed consent
  • documents with sensitive information need to be handled carefully, maintaining confidentiality
  • documents e.g. letters are written with an audience in mind, which may affect authenticity
  • personal bias is likely to be present
20
Q

advantages of public documents

A
  • often cheap and readily available
  • no deception, as no participants
  • no need for informed consent, as documents are already released to the public
  • often already anonymised
  • few interpersonal skills needed, as no face-to-face interaction
21
Q

disadvantages of public documents

A
  • skills are needed to interpret messages and themes
  • analysing data is down to subjective interpretation and so bias could influence the validity of results
22
Q

evaluation of systematic content analysis

A
  • requires less skill to interpret underlying meanings of data
  • quantitative and objective, so favoured by positivists
23
Q

evaluation of thematic content analysis

A
  • requires skills of interpretation, so is open to subjectivity
  • data is higher in validity, and greater in depth, which provides more detailed understanding of the data and research topic, so favoured by interpretivists
24
Q

practical strengths of using documents

A
  • cheap and easy access (public)
  • not time-consuming in data consumption
  • few interpersonal skills needed
  • sometimes only source on the past
  • can be used in triangulation to check results from a primary method
25
practical weaknesses of documents
- gaining access difficult for personal - need analytical skills - time-consuming to analyse - reliant on researcher characteristics to interpret meanings objectively - not all required documents survive - access sometimes prevented for 30 years through the government
26
example of practical strengths of documents
Gerwitz gained access easily to league tables and other public data in his study of marketisation of schools
27
ethical strengths of using documents
- no deception - little harm as no person to person contact - no harm to researcher - already anonymised if publicised - no issues of vulnerable groups
28
ethical weaknesses of using documents
for personal: - confidentiality - access to sensitive information - gaining informed consent can be difficult - taking care over personal data