EPI Flashcards

1
Q

How do you deal with reverse causality?

A

Try using a latency period and doing sensitivity analysis for the date. Test moving the index date back.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reverse causality?

A

A does not cause B, B causes A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a competing risk?

A

A competing risk is an event that either hinders the observation of the event of interest or modifies the chance that this event occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the requirement to create a good propensity score?

A

A large sample (rule of thumb is ten times more subjects than variables in your PS)
Complete data on important confounders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is confounding by indication?

A

Confounding by indication is a special type of confounding that can occur in observational (non-experimental) pharmaco-epidemiologic studies of the effects and side effects of drugs. This type of confounding arises from the fact that individuals who are prescribed a medication or who take a given medication are inherently different from those who do not take the drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is selection bias?

A

The association between exposure and disease differ between the participants in the study and the non-participants due to the selection of subjects or their participation( i.e. drop-off)..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Information bias

A

Systematic error in a study due to erroneous information collected about (or from) the study subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define confounding

A

Open “back door path” between exposure and outcome. The confounding factor is associated with both exposure and outcome but is not a mediator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do you deal with confounding by indication?

A

Adjust for disease severity (disease severity scores).

Propensity score.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Drawbacks of using Propensity scores

A

Groups might look the same, but unaccounted for confounders may be very important.
If you match on PS, then only those that overlap are included, may not be representative.
Less transparent, what dealt with the confounding
Not possible to assess different exposures at the same time?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What can PS be used for

A

Matching, adjusting, stratifying, weighting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do you use a PS

A
  1. Model the exposure variable in a regression as a function of potential confounders. This calculates the predicted probability of exposure for every individual as a function of these covariates.
  2. Apply the propensity score by matching, stratifying, controlling or weighting.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the disadvantages with using classification criteria?

A

Classification criteria generally have a high level of specificity at the expense of somewhat lower sensitivity. Thus using classification criteria might lower the external validity (generalizability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you test for proportional hazards assumptions?

A

Plot the hazard curves and inspect visually. Stratify on the time-scale used. Introduce an interaction term between the exposure and time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Inverse probability of treatment weighting

A

Alternative to multivariable regression modelling. Probability of receiving treatment is first modelled with PS (with logistic regression) then this is used to weight the subjects. Key assumptions are that all confounders have been measured and properly modelled in this treatment model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How to determine which confounders to adjust for

A

1,Subject matter knowledge ->assess the bivariate association between the variable and the exposure/outcome, if one of these are null then there can be no confounding.
2.Examine the statistical impact of adjusting for the potential confounder, if more than a 10% alteration of the parameter estimate, then adjust. This is a worse technique because several weak true confounders can cause mauch confounding, and a more than 10% effect can be false.

17
Q

Average treatment effect

A

The ATE measures the difference in mean (average) outcomes between units assigned to the treatment and units assigned to the control

18
Q

Sens
Spec
Ppv
Npv

A

True p/ True p and false neg
True neg/True neg and false pos
True pos/True pos plus false pos
True neg/True neg plus false neg

19
Q

P-value definition

A

In statistical hypothesis testing, the p-value or probability value is, for a given statistical model, the probability that, when the null hypothesis is true, the statistical summary (such as the sample mean difference between two groups) would be equal to, or more extreme than, the actual observed results.

20
Q

95% Confidence interval

A

Om vi upprepar testet oändligt många ggr så kommer det sanna värdet återfinnas i 95% av konfidensintervallen