Eric Birling Flashcards
(16 cards)
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 2 - ABOUT HIM)
‘Go and look…
…for the father. It’s his responsibility’
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 3)
‘I was in that…
…state when a chap easily turns nasty’
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 2 - ABOUT HIM)
‘She said the father…
…was only a youngster- silly and drinking too much’
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 3)
‘You killed her-…
…and the child she’d have had too- my child!’
FINISH THE QUOTE (STAGE DIRECTIONS - START)
‘half…
…shy, half assertive’
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 1)
‘Why shouldn’t we…
…try for higher wages?’
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 3)
‘You’re not the kind…
…of father a chap can go to when he’s in trouble’
FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 1)
‘What…
…about war?’
ACT 1: ‘What about war?’
- Eric’s questioning tone shows he’s sceptical of Mr Birling’s confident claims about peace — undermines Birling’s authority.
- Challenges older generation’s certainty; hints at his growing independence of thought.
- Reflects Priestley’s criticism of blind optimism & capitalism through dramatic irony (audience knows war does happen).
- Suggests Eric is more socially aware than the older characters; early sign of a conscience & a capacity for change, unlike his parents.
Stage direction/ACT 1: ‘half shy, half assertive’
- Stage direction introduces Eric as socially awkward yet with unspoken confidence — a conflicted, layered character.
- The contrast in adjectives hints at his immaturity & inner turmoil — he’s not fully comfortable in his role yet.
- Reflects his struggle with identity & the pressure of upper-class expectations.
- Priestley presents him as unsteady but redeemable, preparing the audience for his later development.
- Begins to suggest his difference from the older generation; he’s not as fixed/self-assured.
ACT 1: ‘Why shouldn’t they try for higher wages?’
- Eric challenges his father’s capitalist view; his defensive tone shows early signs of empathy for the working class.
- Stands up for workers’ rights, questioning unfair power structures & social class inequality.
- Shows his moral instincts clashing with his upbringing, foreshadowing his later guilt & growth.
- Priestley uses Eric here to represent the younger generation’s potential for change & concern for social justice.
ACT 2: ‘Go and look for the father. It’s his responsibility.’
- Ironic; audience likely realises before the characters that Eric is the father, building tension & dramatic irony.
- Highlights Mrs Birling’s hypocrisy & failure to recognise her own son’s flaws, reinforcing the generational divide.
- Emphasises Eric’s lack of responsibility at this point — he hasn’t yet owned up, showing his immaturity.
- Priestley sets up a moral contrast: Mrs Birling deflects blame while Eric, later, learns to accept it — pointing to the possibility of redemption in the younger generation.
ACT 2: ‘She said the father was only a youngster- silly and drinking too much’
- Portrays Eric as naïve, reckless, & irresponsible, foreshadowing his later confession.
- dismissive language (‘silly’ + ‘drinking’) reflects upper-class male privilege; he behaves badly without consequences.
- Highlights the emotional & social consequences of his actions, especially for Eva, a working-class woman.
- Reinforces Priestley’s critique of class, gender & power; Eric abuses his position, but the play allows him to change.
ACT 3: ‘I was in that state when a chap easily turns nasty’
- Euphemistic phrasing reflects Eric’s shame & attempts to minimise his behaviour, forcing the audience to read between the lines & confront its seriousness.
- detached tone creates discomfort, exposing the dangers of unchecked privilege & how society excuses predatory behaviour, especially in men.
- Priestley uses this admission to challenge complacency around issues like consent, power & entitlement; especially in upper-class circles.
- Reminds us how guilt & regret are often clouded by denial & societal norms.
ACT 3: ‘You’re not the kind of father a chap can go to when he’s in trouble’
- Direct address (‘you’) puts emotional blame on Mr Birling, exposing the coldness of upper-class parenting.
- Highlights emotional distance & masculine repression within the family; Eric feels unable to seek support or admit vulnerability.
- Priestley presents the failure of the older generation to nurture/guide the younger, hinting at why characters like Eric spiral morally.
- Power & authority are shown to be hollow when they come without empathy or responsibility.
ACT 3: ‘You killed her- and the child she’d have had too- my child!’
- Accusatory tone and repetition of “you” show a complete moral reversal — Eric, once unsure, now confronts others with confidence.
- The personal phrase ‘my child’ brings emotional intensity & highlights the real, human cost of the family’s actions.
- Priestley forces the audience to recognise how actions, especially those rooted in class prejudice & selfishness, have lasting & devastating consequences.
- Reflects a growing sense of moral responsibility, contrasting with those who continue to deflect blame.