Eric Birling Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 2 - ABOUT HIM)
‘Go and look…

A

…for the father. It’s his responsibility’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 3)
‘I was in that…

A

…state when a chap easily turns nasty’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 2 - ABOUT HIM)
‘She said the father…

A

…was only a youngster- silly and drinking too much’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 3)
‘You killed her-…

A

…and the child she’d have had too- my child!’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (STAGE DIRECTIONS - START)
‘half…

A

…shy, half assertive’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 1)
‘Why shouldn’t we…

A

…try for higher wages?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 3)
‘You’re not the kind…

A

…of father a chap can go to when he’s in trouble’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

FINISH THE QUOTE (ACT 1)
‘What…

A

…about war?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ACT 1: ‘What about war?’

A
  • Eric’s questioning tone shows he’s sceptical of Mr Birling’s confident claims about peace — undermines Birling’s authority.
  • Challenges older generation’s certainty; hints at his growing independence of thought.
  • Reflects Priestley’s criticism of blind optimism & capitalism through dramatic irony (audience knows war does happen).
  • Suggests Eric is more socially aware than the older characters; early sign of a conscience & a capacity for change, unlike his parents.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Stage direction/ACT 1: ‘half shy, half assertive’

A
  • Stage direction introduces Eric as socially awkward yet with unspoken confidence — a conflicted, layered character.
  • The contrast in adjectives hints at his immaturity & inner turmoil — he’s not fully comfortable in his role yet.
  • Reflects his struggle with identity & the pressure of upper-class expectations.
  • Priestley presents him as unsteady but redeemable, preparing the audience for his later development.
  • Begins to suggest his difference from the older generation; he’s not as fixed/self-assured.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ACT 1: ‘Why shouldn’t they try for higher wages?’

A
  • Eric challenges his father’s capitalist view; his defensive tone shows early signs of empathy for the working class.
  • Stands up for workers’ rights, questioning unfair power structures & social class inequality.
  • Shows his moral instincts clashing with his upbringing, foreshadowing his later guilt & growth.
  • Priestley uses Eric here to represent the younger generation’s potential for change & concern for social justice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ACT 2: ‘Go and look for the father. It’s his responsibility.’

A
  • Ironic; audience likely realises before the characters that Eric is the father, building tension & dramatic irony.
  • Highlights Mrs Birling’s hypocrisy & failure to recognise her own son’s flaws, reinforcing the generational divide.
  • Emphasises Eric’s lack of responsibility at this point — he hasn’t yet owned up, showing his immaturity.
  • Priestley sets up a moral contrast: Mrs Birling deflects blame while Eric, later, learns to accept it — pointing to the possibility of redemption in the younger generation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ACT 2: ‘She said the father was only a youngster- silly and drinking too much’

A
  • Portrays Eric as naïve, reckless, & irresponsible, foreshadowing his later confession.
  • dismissive language (‘silly’ + ‘drinking’) reflects upper-class male privilege; he behaves badly without consequences.
  • Highlights the emotional & social consequences of his actions, especially for Eva, a working-class woman.
  • Reinforces Priestley’s critique of class, gender & power; Eric abuses his position, but the play allows him to change.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ACT 3: ‘I was in that state when a chap easily turns nasty’

A
  • Euphemistic phrasing reflects Eric’s shame & attempts to minimise his behaviour, forcing the audience to read between the lines & confront its seriousness.
  • detached tone creates discomfort, exposing the dangers of unchecked privilege & how society excuses predatory behaviour, especially in men.
  • Priestley uses this admission to challenge complacency around issues like consent, power & entitlement; especially in upper-class circles.
  • Reminds us how guilt & regret are often clouded by denial & societal norms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ACT 3: ‘You’re not the kind of father a chap can go to when he’s in trouble’

A
  • Direct address (‘you’) puts emotional blame on Mr Birling, exposing the coldness of upper-class parenting.
  • Highlights emotional distance & masculine repression within the family; Eric feels unable to seek support or admit vulnerability.
  • Priestley presents the failure of the older generation to nurture/guide the younger, hinting at why characters like Eric spiral morally.
  • Power & authority are shown to be hollow when they come without empathy or responsibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ACT 3: ‘You killed her- and the child she’d have had too- my child!’

A
  • Accusatory tone and repetition of “you” show a complete moral reversal — Eric, once unsure, now confronts others with confidence.
  • The personal phrase ‘my child’ brings emotional intensity & highlights the real, human cost of the family’s actions.
  • Priestley forces the audience to recognise how actions, especially those rooted in class prejudice & selfishness, have lasting & devastating consequences.
  • Reflects a growing sense of moral responsibility, contrasting with those who continue to deflect blame.