evaluating employee performance Flashcards
three concepts associated with assessing performance
performance appraisal, performance development, performance management
application of performance appraisal
job analysis»_space; criterion development»_space; performance appraisal
reasons for evaluating employee performance
training, salary, promotion, termination, research
the difference in compensation between two individuals within the same job is a function of both…
tenure and job performance
limitations that can affect appraisal system
overworked supervisors, no money, cohesive environment
current customers who have been enlisted by a company to periodically evaluate the service
secret shoppers
these ppl actually see the employee’s behavior
peers
peer evaluations have what problems?
leniency and they have negative feedbacks from low peer ratings
a performance appraisal system in which feedback is obtained from multiple sources
360 degree feedback
a performance appraisal strategy in which an employee receives feedback from sources other than just their supervisors
multiple-source feedback
different appraisal methods
appraisal dimensions
should dimensions be weighted?
use of employee comparisons
different appraisal dimensions
traits, competencies, task types, goals
focuses on employee attributes. not a good idea since they provide poor feedback. specificity is very scarce in this dimension
trait-focused performance dimensions
concentrates on the employee’s KSAOs. easy to provide feedback
competency-focused performance dimension
based on the goals to be accomplished by the employee. easier for an employee to understand why certain behaviors are expected
goal-focused performance dimension
weight dimensions indicate what?
that some dimensions are more important than others
why should dimensions be differentially weighted?
it may reduce racial and other biases
why do many organizations choose to weight all performance dimensions equally?
because it is administratively easier to compute and explain to employees
refers to ranking–compare employees with one another (rank order from best to worst)
employee comparisons
refers to hard criteria such as attendance and number of units sold
objective measures
easiest and most common employee comparison; reduces leniency
rank order
a form of ranking in which a group of employees to be ranked are compared one pair at a time
paired comparison
predetermined percentage of employees are placed into a number of performance categories
forced distribution method
four objective measures of performance
quantity, quality, attendance, safety