Everyday Memory Flashcards
Autobiographical memory (AM) has been defined as ..
Autobiographical memory (AM) has been defined as recollected events that belong to a persons past (Rubin, 2005).
Autobiographical memory (AM) has been defined as recollected events that belong to a persons past (Rubin, 2005). What types of memory are involved?
Both episodic and semantic memory.
Theoretically is there a way to predict the amount of either episodic or semantic memory of an autobiographical memory?
One of the factors that determines the relative proportions of episodic and semantic components in AM is how long ago the event to be remembered occurred. Memories of recent events that are rich in perceptual details and emotional content are dominated by episodic memory.
What do we know about when people remember events over their life span?
When participants over 40 are asked to remember events in their lives their memory is high for recent events, but also for events occurring in adolescence and early adulthood. This surprising finding is called the reminiscence bump.
What is the reminiscence bump?
The finding that people over 40 years have significantly better memory from their adolescence and early adulthood than would be predicted if memory decayed linearly with time.
Mention three accepted hypotheses for the reminiscence bump.
- The self-image hypothesis.
- The cognitive hypothesis.
- The cultural life script hypothesis.
The finding that people over 40 years have significantly better memory from their adolescence and early adulthood than would be predicted if memory decayed linearly with time is called the reminiscence bump. One hypothesis for this is the self-image hypothesis. Elaborate.
Clare Rathborne and coworkers (2008) proposed that memory is enhanced for events that occur as a person’s self-image or life identity is being formed.
The finding that people over 40 years have significantly better memory from their adolescence and early adulthood than would be predicted if memory decayed linearly with time is called the reminiscence bump. One hypothesis for this is the cognitive hypothesis. Elaborate.
The cognitive hypothesis for the reminiscence bump proposes that periods of rapid change that are followed by stability cause stronger encoding of memories. Adolescence and young adulthood fit this description because the rapid changes that occur during these periods are followed by the relative stability of adult life.
The finding that people over 40 years have significantly better memory from their adolescence and early adulthood than would be predicted if memory decayed linearly with time is called the reminiscence bump. One hypothesis for this is the cultural life script hypothesis. Elaborate.
This explanation distinguishes between a person’s life story, which is all of the events that have occurred in a person’s life, and a cultural life script, which are culturally expected events that occur at a particular time in the life span. When asking participants when important events in a typical person’s life usually occur, these events usually occurred during the period associated with the reminiscence bump.
Clare Rathborne and coworkers (2008) proposed that memory is enhanced for events that occur as a person’s self-image or life identity is being formed. Did they just make this shit up?
They based this idea on the results of an experiment in which a group of participants with an average age of 54 created “I am” statements, such as “I am a mother” or “I am a psychologist” , that they felt defined them as a person. They were then asked when each statement had become a significant part of their identity. The average age participants assigned to these statements was 25 years, which is within the span of the reminiscence bump.
The cognitive hypothesis for the reminiscence bump proposes that periods of rapid change that are followed by stability cause stronger encoding of memories. Adolescence and young adulthood fit this description because the rapid changes that occur during these periods are followed by the relative stability of adult life. Is there any evidence for this?
The cognitive hypothesis would predict that the reminiscence bump should occur later for people who have had rapid changes in their life that occurred at a time later than adolescence or young adulthood. To test this idea, Robert Schrauf and David Rubin (1998) determined the recollections of people who had emigrated to the United States either in their 20s or in their mid-30s. The findings indicated that those that had emigrated later, did also have a later reminiscence bump.
What do we know about what kind of events are remembered over a life span?
A characteristic of most memorable events is that they are significant and important to the person and, in many cases, are associated with emotions.
Memory and emotion. What evidence is there?
Florin Dolcos and coworkers (2005) tested participant’s ability to recognise emotional and neutral pictures one year after they were initially presented and observed better memory of the emotional pictures. In the same experiment, fMRI brain scans measured as people were remembering, and revealed that amygdala activity was higher for the emotional words. The amygdala is a structure associated with both memory and emotion.
The amygdala is a brain structure associated with both memory and emotion. What evidence is there for this?
Probably a lot of correlational studies in which the amygdala is shown to be more active during emotional stimulation or recall. There is also one case study (no double dissociation though) of a patient B.P. who had suffered damage to his amygdala. When participants without brain damage viewed a slide show about a boy and his mother in which the boy is injured halfway though the story, these participants had enhanced memory for the emotional part of the story. B.P.’s memory was the same as that of the non-brain-damage participants for the first part of the study, but it was not enhanced for the emotional part.
Who coined the term flashbulb memory, and what is it?
Roger Brown and James Kulik (1977) owned the term flashbulb memory to refer to a person’s memory for the circumstances surrounding hearing about shocking, high charged events. They did this because there seems to be something special about these types of memories. They are remembered for long periods of time and are especially vivid and detailed. Brown and Kulik thought it likely that these events were remembered correctly, and while that probably is not true the events are still remembered.
What is a very likely explanation for the “flashbulb memories”?
The narrative rehearsal hypothesis proposed by Ulric Neisser and coworkers (1996) argue we may remember events (like those that happened on 9/11 ) not because of a special mechanism, but because we rehearse these events after they occur (media, relevance persistency and so on).
A psychology professor mentions that bla bla bla “the constructive nature of memory”. What is she on about?
What people report as memories are instructed by the person based on what actually happened plus additional factors, such as the person’s knowledge, experiences, and expectations. This approach to memory is called constructive because the mind constructs memories based on a number of sources of information.
One of the first experiments to suggest that memory is constructive was …
Bartlett’s “War of the Ghosts” experiment.
One of the first experiments to suggest that memory is constructive was Bartlett’s “War of the Ghosts” experiment. Elaborate.
The British psychologist Fredrick Bartlett conducted a classic study of the constructive nature of memory, known as the “War of the Ghosts” experiment. In this experiment, which Bartlett ran before World War I and published in 1932, his participants read a story from the Canadian folklore. They were then called back to recall the tale, this would happen at longer and longer intervals. Their mistakes and inaccuracies in memory followed a pattern in which the tale became influenced by the English culture.
In Bartlett’s “War of the Ghosts” experiment the participants’ recollection of the story became influenced by their knowledge of their own culture. Name this effect.
This is a source monitoring error, or a source misattribution. They remember the tale as the one they read, but they do not remember that some of the information in their memory stems from a source other than the tale - their own culture.
Mention an experiment on the source monitoring error (not Bartlett)
Larry Jacoby and coworkers (1989) demonstrated an effect of source monitoring error by testing participants’ ability to distinguish between famous and non-famous names. Participants read a list of non-famous names and did an immediate test and a delayed test (24h later). They were very accurate in the immediate test, but made errors in the delayed test. Probably, they all felt a sense of familiarity in the delayed test - having seen both famous and non-famous names previously. It is interesting that they did not manage to locate the source of this sense of familiarity.
What is a script?
A script is our conception of the sequence of actions that usually occur during a particular experience.
How can scripts influence memory?
They set up expectations about what usually happens in a particular situation. Gordon Bower and coworkers (1979) did an experiment in which participants were asked to remember short passages about familiar activities such as going to the dentist, going swimming, or going to a party. After a delay period the participants were given the titles of the stories and they were told to write down what they remembered about each story. Their versions of the stories included material that wasn’t presented in the original story, but is typical for the activity described.
What is the misinformation effect?
The misinformation effect is a phenomenon in which a person’s memory for an event is modified by things that happen after the event has occurred.