Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Personality Theory > Exam 2: Ch 4-7 > Flashcards

Exam 2: Ch 4-7 Flashcards

(95 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

Most psychological research on the trait approach relies on _____ studies

A

correlational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

T/F: Trait approach is based on ratio rather than ordinal scales

A

False: The trait approach is based on ordinal scales

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Person-situation debate

A

Asks the following question:

Which is more important in determining what people do: the person or the situation?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Situationism

A

The idea that situation predominately determines behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Single-Trait Approach

A

Examines link between personality and behavior by asking, “What do people that are [that single trait] do?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Many-Trait Approach

A

Asks “Who does that?” - the reverse of the question for singe-trait. Researchers determine which traits correlate with specific behaviors and then see to explain the pattern of correlations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Essential-Trait Approach

A

“Which traits are most important?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Typological Approach

A

Considers people to be too qualitatively different to compare them all on the same trait dimensions. Goal is to identify groups are people similar enough in traits and behaviors that they can be considered all part of the same “type”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

High self-monitors

A

People who are very different between their inner and outer selves and in how they perform in different settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Low self-monitors

A

People who are largely the same inside and out, and do not vary much from one setting to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Narcissism

A

Excessive self-love, so extreme that is can be classified as a personality disorder.

Although charming at first, it usually wears off and the person is manipulative, overbearing, entitled, vain, arrogant, and exhibitionistic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causes of Narcissism

A

Extreme sensitivity to rejections/exclusion. Failure to control impulses and delay gratification,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

California Q-set

A

Example of the Many-Trait Approach

Set of 100 traits/phrases to which the subject agrees or disagrees. The rater then sorts the phrases into categories 1-9, 1 being highly uncharacteristic and 9 being highly characteristic (forced distribution because each category must have a specific number of items). This forces the judges to compare all items directly against each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LIWC

A

Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: calculates the number of words that appear in each of a long list of categories, like “certainty words”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jack and Jean Block’s Study

A

Assessed the personalities of preschoolers, then reassessed them 20 years later on their political beliefs, and scored them on a scale of liberal to conservative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

California F Scale

A

Measures the basic antidemocratic psychological orientation that is the suspected common foundation of intense racial prejudices.

An example of the many-trait approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Pseudoconservativism

A

A pathological version of political conservativism that is motivated by one’s desire for security/”the usual”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe the major issue/bias in the examination of the correlation between political beliefs and personality

A

Most personality psychologists are liberals, so there is a built-in readiness to conclude that conservatives are flawed in some way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Thematic Apperception Test

A

Henry Murray’s List of 20 “needs” that he described as central to the understanding of personality. He theorized this list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Jack and Jeanne Block’s Two Essential Characteristics of Personality

A

“Ego resilience” = psychological adjustment

“Ego control” = impulse control

Individuals high in ego resilience can adjust their level of control based on the circumstances.

“Undercontrol gets one into trouble, but resilience gets one out of it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Undercontrolled individuals

A

Tend to act immediately upon impulses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Hans Eysenck’s 3 essential personality traits

A

Extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Auke Tellegen’s three “superfactors”

A

Positive emotionality, negative emotionality, and constraint

Roughly parallel, but better defined than Eysenck’s essential traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Lexical hypothesis

A

The important aspects of human life will be labeled, and if something is truly important and universal, many words for it will exist in all languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Openness to Experience
Sometimes called culture/intellect. High scorers are creative, imaginative, open-minded, and clever. Also more likely to be liberal, use drugs, and play an instrument
26
Agreeableness
Measures one's tendency to be cooperative. Looks at conformity, compliance, likeability. High scorers tend to be compassionate and polite, although may be push-overs
27
Conscientiousness
Comprises being dutiful, careful, rule-abiding, and ambitious. High scorers are trusted in the workplace, do as they are told, and do not steal. They are usually good drivers but carry a lot of car insurance --\> They avoid risks and seek to protect themselves just in case
28
Neuroticism
May also be called "negative emotionality". High scorers tend to deal ineffectively with problems and react more negatively to stressful events. They are sensitive to social threats and more likely to be unhappy, anxious, and even physically sick. They complain more frequently than low scorers
29
Convergent validation
When several reliable sources all point to the same conclusion
30
The Trait Approach
Assumes that individuals differ in their characteristic patterns of thought, feeling, and behavior. Such patterns are called traits.
31
Person-Situation Debate
Controversy over whether it is worthwhile to characterize people in terms of their traits, considering how inconsistent people are. Situationists vs Personality Theorists
32
Situationist arguments
Behavior is mainly determined by one's situation. Three specific arguments: 1 - Ability of traits to predict behavior is extremely limited 2 - The situations are more important than personality traits in determining what people do 3 - Not only is personality assessment a waste of time, but also many of people's intuitions about each other are fundamentally wrong
33
Upper limit for predictability of behaviors based on personality traits
0.4 A quite low upper limit
34
Walter Mischel
Published *Personality and Assessment* in 1968. Argued that behavior is too inconsistent across situations to allow individual differences to be characterized accurately in terms of broad personality traits. Mischel is considered, to a certain degree, to have kicked off the person-situation debate
35
Absolute evaluation of the .40 correlation
Requires calculation of how many correct and incorrect predictions of behavior a trait measurement with this degree of validity would yield. Use BESD to do so
36
Relative evaluation of the .40 correlation
Compare this degree of predictability for personality traits with the accuracy of other methods (specifically, the predictability power of situational variables)
37
Strong vs Weak Situations
Strong situations command people to behave a certain way (there will almost always be a select few individuals, however, that do not conform due to STRONG personality traits). Weak situations allow for more flexibility in the way that people behave.
38
Fundamental Attribution Error
Tendency of humans to make assumptions about one's personality based on their actions, largely disregarding the situation. Often brief, biased, and limited
39
Interactionism
Recognizes that persons and situations must interact to produce behavior together. Also emphasizes the facts that (1) The effect of a person variable may depend on the situation, and vice versa, (2) people with different personalities may choose/find themselves in different situations, and (3) that situations are affected by the personalities of people who inhabit them
40
With which effector of behavior does blame fall according to the situationist? And according to the personality theorist?
Situationist: Blamed on environment/external factors Personality: Blamed on the actor/intrinsic factors
41
Percent of accurate predictions based on personality according to BESD
r of .40 → 70% accuracy
42
Realistic Accuracy Model
Identifies four stages that affect the accuracy of a judgment: Relevance, availability, detection, utilization If accuracy is hindered, something is going wrong in at least one of these stages
43
Effects of others' judgements on the judgee
Availability of opportunity, self-fulfilling prophecies, expectancy effects
44
Actor-observer bias
Tendency to attribute one's own actions to external factors (like the situation), but the actions of others to internal factors (their personalities)
45
Rosenthal and Jacobsen Study
Some children were labeled as “bloomers” in the classroom and were treated with more intellectual respect and given better feedback and more challenges
46
Snyder, Tanke, and Berscheid
Social Expectancy Effect Experiment studying the effects of attractiveness on the perception of the individual. Finding: Attractive women are expected to be warm and friendly, and are treated in such a manner that they indeed respond that way
47
Convergent validation
The assembly of diverse pieces of information pointing to a common conclusion.
48
The two primary converging criteria for personality judgments
Interjudge agreement (multiple judges making the same conclusion) and behavioral prediction
49
Predictive validity
When a predicted behavior occurs in line with the prediction of a corresponding trait.
50
Moderator variable (and the 4 main ones that affect personality judgments)
One that affects the relationship between two other variables; it changes the correlation between a judgment and its criterion. The Four: The Judge, The Target, the trait that is being judged, and the info on which the judgement is based
51
Judgability
A matter of “what you see is what you get” - The behavior of judgable people is organized coherently
52
Sociosexualtiy
The willingness to engage in sexual relations with minimal acquaintanceship with, or commitment to and from, one's partner
53
Traits that are able to be judged fairly accurately after just 5 seconds of interaction? Which traits are not?
Accurately judged: Extraversion, conscientiousness, and intelligence Not accurately judged: Neuroticism, Openness, and Agreeableness
54
Boundary on the Acquaintanceship Effect
A judge who has known the judgee for a longer period of time does not always make the most accurate predictions of their behaviors. It depends on the contexts in which the judge knows the judgee and in which the prediction is being made. e.g. a student more accurately predicting their professor's behavior in class next week compared to the prediction made by the professor's wife
55
Critical Realism
The philosophical view that the absence of perfect, infallible criteria for determining the truth does not imply that all interpretations of reality are equally valid. Rather, one can use empirical evidence to determine which views of reality are more or less likely to be valid. Under this frame of thought, the answer to the question, “What criteria can be used to assess accuracy?” is: All info that might be helpful
56
Constructivism
The philosophical view that reality does NOT exist and only idea of reality exist. These ideas are “constructions”
57
The most predictable traits based on people's faces
Extraversion agreeableness
58
“Input” in Rosenthal's thoery
The way that teachers teach higher volume and more difficult material to “high-expectancy” students
59
“Output” in Rosenthal's Theory
Teachers giving extra opportunities to high-expectancy students to allow them to show what they have learned Think: **O**utput= **O**pportunity
60
“Feedback” in Rosenthal's Theory
Teachers giving more differentiated, specific feedback to high-expectancy students in comparison to low-expectancy students Think: Feedback = diFFerent, speciFic Feedback
61
“Climate” in Rosenthal's Theory
The way that teachers project a warmer emotional attitude towards high-expectancy students compared to low Think: climate = WARM attitude
62
The four-factor theory proposed by Robert Rosenthal regarding intellectual expectancy
High-expectancy students excel beyond their peers because teachers treat them differently in four ways: climate, feedback, input, output
63
Characteristics of individuals that are good targets
High in judgability, predictable behavior based on past behavior, and they are more well-adjusted, agreeable, and extraverted
64
T/F: Family/culture can be one of the main interferences to developing self-knowledge
True! Restrictive cultures may limit self-expression, which would limit self-knowledge
65
Methods of improving self-knowledge (four)
Introspection, seeking neutral feedback, observing your own behavior
66
The four opposing tendencies in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Extraversion vs Introversion Sensing vs Intuition Thinking vs Feeling Judgment vs Perception
67
Why is Myers-Briggs popular?
Provides seemingly rich, intriguing, insightful descriptions of each type. All types have positive explanations. People enjoy learning their type
68
Criticisms of Myers Briggs
Not useful for selection or prediction of life outcomes. Based on normally distributed scores. Unreliable. No evidence that different types follow, persist in, or succeed in different lines of work
69
Caspi's three personality types
Based on level of adjustment: (1) Well-adjusted, (2) Maladjusted-overcontrolled: too uptight, deny their own pleasure, (3) Maladjusted-under-controlled: too impulsive, prone to risky activities
70
T/F: Knowledge of a person's type allows for the most accurate predictions of their behavior and life outcomes.
FALSE. No benefit of the type approach over the trait approach
71
Describe the issue with cutoff scores in typological approaches
Individuals who are both close to the average, but in slightly different directions, will be classified as different personality types
72
Rank-order consistency
The maintenance of individual differences in behavior or personality over time or across situations
73
Temperament
Includes basic attributes that are present at birth, including activity level, emotional reactivity, and cheerfulness
74
Heterotypic Continuity
The expression of fundamental differences will vary as one ages, but the underlying trait is the same (ie an emotionally fragile child acts differently than an emotionally fragile adult, but the underlying trait is the same)
75
Effectors of Personality Stability
Temperament, physical and environmental factors, birth order (1st child is treated differently than following), early experience, person-environment transactions, cumulative continuity and maturity
76
Cumulative continuity principle
Personality becomes more stable with age. Goes along with the fact that environment becomes more stable with age
77
Person-Environment transaction
People creating environments that are compatible with, and may magnify, their personality traits
78
Active Person-Environment Transaction
People seeking out situations that are compatible with their personalities and avoiding those that are incompatible
79
Reactive Person-Environment Transaction
People with different personalities (may) react differently to the same situation
80
Evocative Person-Environment Transaction
The process by which a people may change situations they encounter through behaviors that express their personality
81
Cross-sectional study
Surveys different groups of people at different ages
82
Cohort Effect
The tendency for a research finding to be limited to one group
83
Maturity Principle
The idea that the traits required for adult roles increase with age
84
Social Clock
The traditional expectations of society for when a person is expected to have achieved certain goals, like starting a family or getting settled into a career.
85
Narrative identity
The story one tells oneself about who they are. Builds progressively to view oneself in the following roles (cumulatively): actor, agent (starting around age 7-9, guided by goals and values), then author
86
Generalizing Gradient
Reflects the degree to which a response learned to one stimulus is also elicited by other, similar stimuli
87
Steps to Personality Change
1. Both Pre-conditions (desire and belief in feasibility) 2. Self-regulated behavioral changes 3. Self-regulated changes become habitual 4. Trait change
88
Four Approaches to Personality Change
1. Psychotherapy (eg cognitive-behavioral, often w drugs) 2. General Interventions (often directed at groups of high-risk children) 3. Targeted interventions 4. Life experiences
89
Self-Affirmations
Ex of a targeted intervention. Involves patient writing an essay about one or more values that are important to them. Sheer act of writing proves to decrease defensiveness. Leads to lasting change
90
Firstborns are more \_\_\_\_\_\_\_. Laterborns are more \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.
1st: Ambitious, supportive of traditional values Later: independent, open-minded, and even rebellious
91
Social investment principle
Changing social roles at different stages of life can cause personality to change. Infants, children, adults, and the elderly all connect to society in different ways
92
Corresponsive principle
Person-environment transactions can cause personality traits to remain consistent, or even magnify, over time`
93
Identity Development Principle
People seek to develop a stable sense of who they are, and then strive to act consistently with this self-view
94
Role continuity principle
Taking on roles like being a “jock” or a “brain” can lead personality to be consistent over time
95
Plasticity principle
Personality can change at any time (but such change may not be easy)

Personality Theory (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions