Exam 2 Material (Ch 5-8) Flashcards
(148 cards)
What is MAGICAL # 7±2?
It is the capacity limit of the number of info processing tasks that we can do simultaneously.
-On average, people can remember about 7 digits when recalling a set of numbers that were just read to them.
What is SUBITIZING?
Ability to perceive/guess the right number of items presented accurately and rapidly.
Number of items must be less than or equal to 7.
What is CHUNKING?
(i.e. Recoding)
Grouping items together into richer, more meaningful forms
Describe the BROWN-PETERSON TASK.
Method: subjects see a set of 3 letters in each trial. after seeing the letters, they must do a distracting task (ex. counting backwards by 7 from a random number) for varying amounts of time (retention interval). then subjects are asked to recall the 3 letters.
Conclusion: performance in letter recall DECREASES as you INCREASE the length of distracting task (i.e. retention interval)
What is RAPID DECAY?
Forgetting caused by passage of time.
What is PROACTIVE INTERFERENCE?
Interference from older material on your memory for current info.
Describe the experiment that Keppel and Underwood did to test proactive interference.
Method: Looked at the 1st trial of all subjects and then varied retention intervals of separate groups.
Result: Showed that the results of 1st trial of all subjects had the same level of ability of recalling despite having dif retention interval lengths.
Conclusion: showed proactive interference.
Brown-Peterson performed another experiment, but this time he kept the retention interval constant but had his subjects go through multiple trials w/ this condition. What was his result?
As the number of trials increased, the ability to correctly recall decreased.
Conclusion: Shows interference results from similarity.
What is Wicken’s idea of “Release from Proactive Interference?
If memory material is switched (ex. letters–>digits), interference should be reduced
-Level of interference reduction depends on how unalike the 2 materials are.
How can “release from proactive interference” be seen as TEMPORAL DISCRIMINATION?
Because when there are multiple trials, you must discriminate between the most recent stimuli as well as earlier stimuli.
- Release of proactive interference is a result of ENHANCED temporal discrimination
- Temporal discrimination shows you the differences b/w material.
What is THE STERNBERG MEMORY-SCANNING TASK?
Method: Subjects go through multiple trials: on each trials, there’s a memory set (typically 2-6 items; ex. F, R, J) and a probe. Subject has to indicate as fast as possible whether probe was in memory set.
Focus of Task: Response time (Starting when probe appears) NOT accuracy
Conclusion: Sternberg develops a 4 stage process model of memory scanning based on this task.
Describe Sternberg’s 4 STAGES OF PROCESS MODEL.
- Encode probe–>recognize what the probe is (affected by clarity of probe)
- Scan–>affected by set size
- Binary decision–>Yes or No (affected by probability of response)
- Execute Response–>final decision; decide how to respond (affected by hand of response)
What does Sternberg conclude about memory scanning and what is his explanation?
It is serial recall and exhaustive.
SERIAL b/c if in parallel then there’d be no need for response time to increase w/ set size.
EXHAUSTIVE b/c when we find the probe, we continue through the rest of the set. If self-terminating, once we found the probe we would stop scanning.
Name some limitations of Sternberg’s Work.
- Serial, exhaustive scanning only works in an artificial setting, cannot be applied to the real world.
- Low ecological validity
- Repeated items in memory set have a shorter response time.
- Fast response to last item in memory set–subject could have used some of the scan time to start rehearsing
Describe 2 models that could mimic serial, exhaustive scanning.
- Parallel models where scanning slows down as more items are being scanned.
- Cascade models where scans start at dif times but they could overlap if a later scan starts before a earlier scan finishes
What is the PRIMACY EFFECT?
Additional attention/rehearsal to beginning items–>beginning items remembered best, middle items not so much
What is the RATIO RULE?
Magnitude of recency effect is a function of ratio of interpresentation intervals to retention interval
(i.e. measure of temporal distinctiveness b/w materials)
What is LONG TERM RECENCY EFFECT?
-You are better able at recalling items that have been read you to most recently (i.e. at end of list) than those that came before (i.e. middle of list)
Describe the continuous-distractor task. What does it show?
Goal of Task: to prevent subjects from rehearsing
-If subject do a distracting task (ex. do math)….
1. after EVERY item in set
then LONG TERM RECENCY EFFECT occurs
2. after LAST item in set
then recency effect disappears
What is the DUAL-TASK METHOD?
People can do 1 task (ex. reason about sentences) without much interference from other activities (ex. short lists/repeated syllables)
What is WORKING MEMORY MODEL? (Baddeley & Hitch)
- System composed of specialized subsystems
- Intended to both hold info and carry out processing
- If tasks draw on common resources, then they will interfere with each other
Describe the 2 studies Brooke did to show the distinction between VERBAL and SPATIAL WORKING MEMORY MODELS.
2 Tasks:
- Classify words in a sentence as nouns and non-nouns
- Classify angles in a letter as inside or outside
2 Methods of Response:
- Say out loud
- Point at ‘Y’ or ‘N’
Result: Saying response out loud is faster than pointing.
Conclusion: Verbal working memory processes faster than spatial working memory. Especially in 2nd task which require visual processing of both the angles in letter and finding ‘Y’ and ‘N’ to point to.
Describe the working-memory span experiment.
Task: Read a series of sentences for meaning and remember the last word of each sentence.
-this requires both storage and processing
Result: subjects on average could remember 2-5 words
Conclusion: Memory span is approx. 2-5 words.
What is MEMORY SPAN?
Longest list of items that a person can repeat back in order after being presented the list of items.