EXAM 3 Flashcards
(144 cards)
Circle of thought
World -> describe -> elaborate -> decide -> plan -> act ->
(thinking processes are distributed throughout the brain; MAINLY FRONTAL LOBE!)
Concepts
Categories of objects, events, or ideas with common properties, basic building blocks of thought
Formal concepts
Formed by logical, specific rules
(example: square or car)
Natrual/abstract concepts
- No fixed sets of defining facts
- formed by everyday life experiences
(EX: everyday life experiences; beauty; learning to walk)
Prototype (prototypical member)
- typical member of a category
- a member of natural concept that has most (if not all) characteristics
(EI: we view a car w four wheels as prototypical)
Proposition
Mental representations that express relationships between concepts; can be true or false
chips < candy
candy < milkshake
chips < milkshake
Schemas
Sets of propositions that create generalizations and expectations about categories of objects, places, events, and people
(EX: All grandmas are old, have gray hair, and bake cookies; or you can start a car that you have never been in before)
Scripts
Schemas about familiar activities and situations that guide behavior in those situations
(ex: restaurant script - fast food joints have you pay before eating; fancier places make you pay after)
Mental Images
Mental representations of visual information (includes visual, auditory ect)
(ex: hearing a desc. of your blind date give you a mental image of them)
Mental Models
Representations of how concepts relate to each other in the real world; can be correct or incorrect
(think of the driver tossing his cigarette out and it landing back in their car)
Cognitive map
Mental representations of familiar parts of your world
(ex: rerouting to get to class faster if your normal route is blocked)
Formal Reasoning
Logic may be correct, but initial assumption may be incorrect
response to:
all gun owners (A) are people (B)
all criminals (C) are people (B)
JUST BECAUSE A == B AND C == B DOES NOT MEAN A == C
so
All gun owners (A) are all criminals (C)
Is a FALSE statement
Hill climbing strategy
Keep progressing towards the goal; taking what seems like the most straightforward path to reach it
Tower Of Hanoi
A perfect example of the FLAWS OF HILL CLIMBING! In over to solve you must work BACKWARDS
Means end analysis
- Starts by comparing the current state + the goal state
- “Decomposition”- breaking up the problem into “Sub Problems”
Work Backwards
Focusing on the goal rather than the current state + working backward from the goal
(like tower of Hanoi)
Find Analogies
We are reminded of solving similar problems
Mental sets
persistence in using strategies that worked in the past
Functional Fixedness
Think of an object as only functioning in its usual way
(Think of the example of tying string w/ the tools + The matchbox, candle, and screws
Confirmation Bias
Preffeting information that confirms preexisting positions of beliefs, while ignoring contradictory evidence
(the rooster raises the sun when he crows)
Heuristics
Rule of thumb (a mental shortcut)
saves time and effort
Can be useful but can bias our thinking
- anchoring
- availability
- representativeness
Anchoring Heuristics
The initial response sets the stage for subsequent judgments
(It will be used as a reference point, even if it is obviously wrong; they are long-lived and hard to set aside to think differently)
(ex: $600 for a couch, but when we see the context that it USED to be $1080, we think it is a deal)
Availability Heuristic
Judging the likelihood (frequency) of an event based on how readily available other instances are in memory
(Think about how we hear more stories on homicides vs cars running red lights. Homicides are much less likely to happen but we are more likely to hear about them. Same thing for hearing about the few that win the lottery but not the millions that lose it all the time)