Exam 3 Flashcards
Why have clinical psychologists virtually abandoned the terms “normal” and “abnormal”?
They fail to account for the diversity of human experiences, carry potentially harmful stigma, and often rely on subjective or context-dependent criteria. Instead, psychologists now focus on understanding the complexity of human behavior in its proper context, considering individual differences and cultural factors.
What can be used instead of the terms “normal” and “abnormal”?
-Diagnosis
-Investigational approach
-Case formulation
Can you answer questions about the definition of a “mental disorder” based on the DSM-5-TR?
Defined as a significant disturbance in emotional, cognitive, or behavioral functioning, typically associated with distress or dysfunction in key areas of life, and reflecting underlying psychological, biological, or developmental issues. However, certain behaviors related to culture, common stressors, or societal conflicts are excluded from being labeled as mental disorders.
What items are excluded by definition?
○ Culture-bound behaviors
○ A common stressor (death of a loved one)
○Conflicts between individual and society
DSM Signs
= outwardly observable phenomenon
○ Things that can be observed
DSM Symptoms
= subjective experience reported by the client
○ Described by client
DSM Associated features
= aspect of a psychiatric disorder such as its prevalence, course, prognostic factors, or common co-occurring diagnoses.
○ Ex: both parents diagnosed with something
Internal Classification of Diseases (ICD)
= diagnostic codes given for ease of data collection and billing
What key things do you know about the history of the DSM?
Early Classification:
1845: Esquirol classifies mental disorders.
1883: Kraepelin distinguishes different forms of mental illness.
Precursor to DSM:
1917: Statistical Manual for Insane Institutions (22 categories).
DSM-I (1952):
102 categories, influenced by psychoanalysis, divided into psychoses & psychoneuroses.
DSM-II (1968):
182 disorders, vague descriptions, poor reliability.
DSM-III (1980):
Biomedical focus, specific diagnostic criteria, added PTSD & ADHD, removed homosexuality as a disorder.
DSM-III-R (1987):
292 categories, reorganized disorders, added and removed conditions (e.g., hoarding, Asperger’s).
DSM-IV (1997) & DSM-IV-TR (2000):
297 disorders, introduced distress criteria for diagnosis.
DSM-5 (2013) & DSM-5-TR (2022):
265 disorders, based on scientific data, aligned with ICD-10-CM codes.
Advantages of DSM
Standardized Diagnosis: Provides a consistent system for diagnosing mental disorders.
Clear Criteria: Uses specific criteria to help clinicians make accurate diagnoses.
Improved Treatment: Helps guide treatment decisions based on clear diagnoses.
Research Tool: Useful for research and studying mental health conditions.
Insurance Coverage: Helps with insurance billing by providing recognized diagnostic codes.
Limitations of the DSM
-Reliability Issues:
Many disorders have “fair” interrater reliability (e.g., PTSD, ADHD, MDD).
Diagnoses may not be consistent across clinicians, raising concerns about the validity of common disorders.
-Descriptive Criteria Only:
Only signs and symptoms are listed, not causes.
No medical tests for diagnosing disorders, making them based on descriptions rather than objective measures.
-Ambiguous Criteria:
Criteria are often unclear (e.g., “marked fear,” “clinically significant”), leading to varied clinician interpretations.
-Sociocultural Context:
Descriptions may overlook cultural context, meaning behaviors could be seen as disorders without considering cultural differences.
The DSM-5-TR has made efforts to update cultural considerations but still faces challenges.
-Categories vs. Dimensions:
The DSM places disorders into fixed categories rather than seeing them on a continuum (e.g., anxiety being normal in some situations).
-Over Inclusiveness:
Some disorders have an overly broad scope, including behaviors that may not necessarily be mental disorders (e.g., childhood difficulties).
-Additional Concerns:
The DSM may promote essentialism, suggesting that people with mental disorders are intrinsically different, leading to stigmatization.
What is meant by categories vs. dimensions for the limitations of the DSM?
Categories: DSM puts disorders into fixed groups (e.g., anxiety disorder), not considering varying degrees of symptoms.
Dimensions: Symptoms exist on a spectrum (e.g., mild to severe anxiety), but the DSM doesn’t capture this gradual variation.
What do these stand for:
-PTSD
-ADHD
-PD
DMDD
-ODD
-MDD
-OCD
-GAD
® PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder
® ADHD = attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder
® PD = personality disorder
® DMDD = disruptive mood dysregulation disorder
® ODD = oppositional defiant disorder
® MDD = major depressive disorder
® OCD = obsessive-compulsive disorder
® GAD = generalized anxiety disorder
What are approximate kappa values for MDD and GAD and why is this a problem?
Kappa values for MDD and GAD are around 0.20 (low agreement).
Problem: Low reliability means clinicians don’t consistently agree on the diagnosis, raising concerns about the validity of these disorders.
Does the DSM provide causes for disorders?
No, the DSM only describes symptoms and classifies disorders based on patterns of distress and dysfunction.
It does not explain the causes (biological, psychological, or environmental) of disorders.
Can you answer questions about what the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) are?
- An initiative of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
○ Alternative to the DSM that is in progress
○ Promotes research integrating genetics, neuroscience, and behavioral science
○ Leads to objective diagnostic system of “biotypes” aligning with biologically based treatments
○ Includes 6 domains with sets of constructs (identify names)
§ Problems understood in terms of neurobiological processes to determine treatment
What are the 6 domains of the NIMH RDoC?
-Negative valence systems
-Positive valence systems
-Cognitive systems
-Social processes
-Arousal and regulatory systems
-Sensorimotor systems
How does the DSM-5-TR differ from the RDoC?
- DSM-5-TR
○ Categorical
○ Works from the top down, starting with categories and determining what fits into those categories
○ Descriptive diagnostic system
○ Either depressed or nondepressed category - RDoC
○ Dimensional
○ Works from the ground up starting with brain-behavior relationships and linking these to clinical signs and symptoms
○ Grounded in biological theory
What is case formulation?
= a hypothesis about particular psychological mechanisms leading to and maintaing psychological distress/dysfunction
* Grounded in research-based psychological theories
* 4 primary elements
What are the 4 primary elements of case formulation?
-Problem list
-Mechanisms
-Predisposing factors
-Precipitants
How does the DSM-5-TR differ from case formulation?
Unlike the DSM-5-TR’s descriptive and atheoretical diagnostic criteria, case formulation is principle-driven
Why does case formulation employ an interactive approach?
Allows for revising hypotheses based on new information as it comes in.
This approach is tailored to fit individual clients because their needs, experiences, and responses can change over time.
By revisiting and refining the formulation, clinicians can adjust treatment plans and better address the client’s specific situation, leading to more personalized and effective care.
How do clinical psychologists formulate treatment plans?
- Assessment: Gather client information (symptoms, history).
- Case Formulation: Understand issues and causes.
- Set Goals: Define clear treatment objectives.
- Choose Interventions: Select appropriate therapies.
- Tailor to Client: Customize to individual needs.
- Monitor Progress: Continuously assess and adjust the plan.
Important aspects of communicating the treatment plan to the client:
-Clarity: simple wording
-Collaboration: client involved
-Transparency: open about treatment, risks, challenges
-Setting expectations: discuss goals, progress, time it takes
-Cultural sensitivity: consider their background and values
-Confidentiality: privacy & data protection
-Regular check-ins: ongoing review & adjust