Exam 3 chapter 10 Flashcards

1
Q

Andrea Yates

A

drowned her children; religious delusions; deemed competent; pleaded NGRI, found guilty; second trial b/c of law and order, found guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

insanity

A

the criminal’s state of mind at the time the crime was committed. Insanity requires that, due to a mental illness, a defendant lacks moral responsibility and culpability for the crime and therefore should not be punished
o not scientific, but legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The retribution (or just deserts) perspective

A

the punishment for a crime should be proportionate to the harm committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

o the deterrence perspective on punishment (specific and general)

A

offenders should be punished so that they learn that committing a crime leads to punishment (i.e., specific deterrence) and so that other similarly situated individuals will vicariously learn that certain actions lead to punishment (i.e., general deterrence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

mens rea

A

the guilty mind; awareness of the wrongfulness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

actus reus

A

the criminal act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

wild beast test of insasnity

A

rex v Arnold, jurors told to acquit person who tried to assisnate British lord, found him to be no more than a brute or a wiild beast. The test means that insanity had become less a moral failing and more a cognitive failing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

three important cases for NGRI

A

mcnaughton case, durham case, Hinckley case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

mchnaughton case/rule (26 states OH)

A
  • Suffering from defect of reason/disease of mind
  • Didn’t know nature and quality of act
  • Didn’t know act was wrong

have to prove that defendant suffered from a mental illness that affected ability to understand. policeman at the elbow test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

durham standard

A

released from Navy for mental health reasons, broke into appartment, judge refused to let him plead insanity
reexamined mcnaughton
an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or mental defect”
judges didnt like the new reliance on mental health professionals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ALI standard (brawner rule) (21)

A

response to the durham standard

person not responsible if at the time of the crime, he couldnt appreciate the wrongfulness or couldnt conform to the law

tried to do both legal and mental health prongs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

hinckley case

A

assisnation attempt on Ronald Reagan. 4 mental health professionals testified he had disturbances (schizophrenia)
first examples of neurolaw testimony
found NGRI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

neurolaw testimony

A

testimony intended to show a link b/t brain abnormalities and an individual’s illegal behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

o The Insanity Defense Reform Act (IDRA) of 1984

A

 required, in federal courts, that there be a presumption of sanity and that defendants prove “by clear and convincing evidence” that they were insane at the time of the crime.

-volitional prong was dripped, experts were barred from giving testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

 affirmative defense

A

when a defendant bears the burden of proof for a defense at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

o even when experts ____ offering a conclusion about whether the defendant was insane, mock jurors ____ remembered that such a conclusion had been offered

A

1) avoided
2)mistakenly

17
Q

what states abolished the insanity defense

A

montana, Utah, Kansas, Idaho

18
Q

Guilty but mentally ill

A

permitted in 20 states, guilty of the crime, sentenced to prison, supposed to recieve mental health treatment no guarentee

19
Q

a mens rea defense

A

defendant lacks the capacity to possess the mental state required for certain crimes. Must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt

20
Q

Clark v arizona

A

stole a car, shot police officer, found sane, thought he was shooting an alien instead of a police officer, didnt take into account mens rea

21
Q

what standard does the fed government use?

A

tech. ALI, but more like mcnaughton

22
Q
A