Exam 3 chapter 12 Flashcards

1
Q

trayvon martin

A

17, holding a bag of skittles, was followed, shot by police, zimmerman went on trial not found guilty by 6 ww and 1 hispanic, judge didnt allow voice analysis experts to testify

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

mathematical model of decision making (meter model)

A

pieces of evidence presented are represented as numerical weights that shift the mental meter in one direction or the other. not realistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

story model of decision making

A

jurors create stores to make sense of the evidence presented at trial. Need to complete the motivations and other events to complete the story. they select the verdict that best fits with the story they constructed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the ____ of the relevant evidence is the ____ predictor of a jury verdict

A

1) strength
2) best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

liberation hypothesis

A

in most trials, the verdicts are determined by the compelling evidence. however, where the evidence is ambiguous, jurors dont use it so much. theyll base their decision on past experiences, beliefs, and prejudices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

people who fit criminal stereotypes are treated ____ _____ than someone who doesn’t fit the stereotype

A

more harshly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

inadmissible evidence

A

information that might be prejudicial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ironic processes

A

when we make an effort not to think about something, the thing usually dominates our thoughts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

reactance theory

A

people are motivated to maintain thier freedom, the judge telling them to ignore evidence seems to threaten that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

even though a piece of evidence is legally ____, jurors ___ use the info if they feel like it ____ them to make the right decisoion

A

1) inadmissible
2) will
3) helps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

impeachment evidence

A

meant to damage the credibility of a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when the testimony is ____, its only persuasive if the credentials are strong

A

complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The presence of ____ jurors motivated ____ jurors to moderate their ____ ____ during deliberation

A

1) black
2) white
3) racial biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

strong jurors

A

jurors who seem to have a disproportionate influence on the deliberation process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

leniency bias

A

in evenly split, its more likely that the final verdict will be lenient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

verdict driven style

A

immediately taking a vote after deliberations start rather than orienting the discussion around the verdict options

17
Q

evidence driven style

A

the first vote is postponed until after they discuss the evidence

18
Q

postponing the vote procedures produces ____ ______ _____ because people aren’t worried about defending their position after the first vote

A

more probing discussions

19
Q

informational inlfuence

A

they change their opinions because other jurors make compelling arguments

20
Q

normative influence

A

give into group pressure

21
Q

in punitive decisions, _____ is used. In decisions like how much fines should be awarded, _____ is used

A

1) informational
2) normative

22
Q

hung juries

A

groups that don’t reach a unanimous verdict and never reach reconciliation

23
Q

stages in the deliberation process

A

orientation, open conflict, reconciliation

24
Q

the 3 most vocal people use about ____ of the deliberation time

A

50%

25
Q

______ of the deliberation time is devoted to _____

A

70-75%

evidence

26
Q

williams v florida 70

A

armed robbery, convicted by a 6 person jury, supreme court ruled that it was permissible

27
Q

ballew v gerogia 78

A

5 person juries are too small, 6 person is the minimum

however, their findings were wrong, larger juries are better

28
Q

burch v louisana

A

if 6 ppl are used, decisions have to be unanimous

29
Q

___ states now require unanimity in misdemeanors, ____ require it in felony cases, ____ required in murder

A

26
44
always

30
Q

dynamite charge

A

breaks the deadlock in hung juries, asked to reexamine their opinions

31
Q

jury nullification

A

base thier verdicts on reasoning that ignores, disregards, or goes beyond the law

judges almost never say they can do this

32
Q

moderate reformers

A

we have a good system

like allowing jurors to take notes during. trials

33
Q

radical reformers

A

believe the system is badly broken and have called for big reforms

like replacing juries with a panel of judges

34
Q

preinstructions

A

before trial begins, reading instructions to the jurors so they can think on it while they hear the evidence

35
Q

allowing jury discussion during trial

A

could help correct misunderstandings prior to formal deliberations, isnt found to impact the outcome of the trial

36
Q

judges as decision makers

A

still affected by inadmissible evidence

personal characteristics affect them

when juries and judges disagree, juries are more lenient, but they agree most of the time

37
Q

which states require judges to preinstruct juries?

A

arizona, Colorado, indiana