Exam 3 COPY COPY Flashcards
what is the difference between oldowan and archeulian
- oludwan is chopper
- archuelian is biface/handaxe
archeulian technology
- archeulian technology developed 1.4 mya
- characterized by the handaze or biface
- raw materials were transported long distances
- butchering meat is evident (but does not necessarily mean hunting)
- a sizeable portion of the diet was still from plant materials
behavior at zhoukoudian cave site
- homo erectus bones indicates habitation
- high density of animal bones indicates diet
- ash layer indicated controlled fire and cooking
- may have been a hyena den
- homo erectus bones indicates hyena prey
- high density of animal bones indicates other prey, including the hyena living there
- ash later indicates natural organic deposits
african v asian homo erectus
- african erectus are too big for h. habilis, too derived for h. rudolfensis and too generalized for h. erectus
- many african homo erectus have thinner skull bones attributed to a new species called homo ergaster
what is h. erectus associated with in the lumper v splitter debate in this class?
old world
evolution of h. erectus
- some time after 2 mya, h. erectus likely evolved in africa from an earlier form of homo - possibly from h. rudolfensis or h. habilis
several things are clear: - they are larger in body size
- larger brains
- reduced molar size
- inherited oldowan tool technology
- first hominin to leave africa - georgia in 1.8 mya and java in 1.6 mya
what is archaic homo?
- archaic humans
- blanket term referring to a mixed group of fossils more derived than homo erectus, but less derived than anatomically modern humans
- example: neaderthals
- used to be called archaic homo sapiens
when are archaic homo present in the fossil record? - homo erectus
1.6 mya - 120,000 ya
when are archaic homo present in the fossil record? - archaic homo
640,000 - 120,000
when are archaic homo present in the fossil record? - AMH
200,000 ya
what is the issue in calling archaic homo “archaic homo sapiens?”
likely represent multiple lineages, some lead to AMH but some lead to other species such as neanderthals
what are some of the possible species of archaic homo?
- h. neanderthalensis
- denisovans
- h. rhodesiensis
- h. naledi
- h. antecessor
- h. bodoensis
- h. heidelbergensis
homo heidelbergensis
- defined by otto schoetensack in 1908 based on the mauer jaw
- smaller molars (derived)
- dated to 500 kya
- for limpers, many archaic homo specimens are grouped here
homo neanderthalensis
- lived throughout europe and the middle east
- existed between 200-10kya
- feldhofer grotto, neander valley, germany
- 1856
shanidar 1
- long, flat low braincase
- occipital bun
- low, receding forehead
- strong bowridge
- rather large, wide nose
la ferrassie 1
- projecting midface
- little or no chin
qafzeh 9
- rather short, round, high braincase
- rounded occipital
- high forehead
- smaller nose
predmost 3
- flatter midface
- chin
who is marcellin boule?
- called out neanderthals as a dead-end lineage
- inaccurate reconstructions of neanderthals
what are some indications neanderthals were cold adapted?
- the combination of features in the face (large nose), body shape (stout body shape) has lead some researchers to believe that they were cold adapted
- humans living in colder environments tend to show taller, longer noses, and have shorter squatter stature
what is the bahavior of neanderthals?
- known to intentionally bury dead with grave goods
- care for elderly/vulnerable
- cannibalism?
- violence?
la chapelle-aux-saints
- old, osteoarthritic neanderthal from correze, france
- excavated 1908-1911
- 50 kya
- old man
trauma among neadnerthals
- the neaderthals have particularly high rates of trauma on their bones
what neanderthal skeletons have significant trauma to their bones before death
- la chapelle-aux-saints
- la frarraissie
- la quina 5
- sala
- krapina 3
- all of the shanidar material
- saccopastore 1
- kebara 2