exam one Flashcards

(72 cards)

1
Q

Social psychology

A

the scientific attempt to explain how the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of the individual are influenced by the actual presence of other human beings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Person-situation debate

A

What determines individual behavior?
Is it the person– personality, values, interests
Is it the situation– social norms, expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The person

A

Personality– long-standing traits and patterns that propel individuals to consistently think, feel, and behave in certain and consistent ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Big 5 personality traits

A

you either have high or low levels of these characteristics
Openness to experience– open-minded, curios
Conscientiousness– thoughtfulness, organized
Extraversion
Agreeableness– willing to compromise, cooperative
Neuroticism– emotional stability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

History of the person-situation debate

A

Key Figure: Walter Mischel
Topic: Personality and Assessment
Arguments:
- Lack of consistency in behavior
- Situations may be more predictive of behavior than personality traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Correlation Findings:

A

Strongest correlation found: r = 0.30
r^2: Proportion of variance explained
Only 9% of behavior variation explained by personality (for r = 0.30)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Field Division

A

Trait theorists vs. situationists
Conclusion: Situations deemed more crucial than traits in explaining behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Correlations

A

Range from -1 to 1
Magnitude– strength of relationship
Direction is positive or negative
Positive– r > .5
Negative– r < -.5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Learning styles

A

Reflective (deep processing)
Synthesis analysis and elaborative processing– breaking down complex concepts to make them easier to understand

Agentic (shallow processing)
Methodical study and fact retention– more goal driven

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hypothesis of study

A

Openness to Experience:
Associated with reflective strategies
Deep engagement likely
Higher GPA expected

Conscientiousness:
Associated with agentic strategies
Timely completion of tasks
Higher GPA expected

H7:
Relationship between openness and GPA mediated by reflective strategies
Mediation:
DV-IV relationship influenced by a third variable

Article found that personality traits and learning styles together explained 17% of the variance in GPA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fundamental attribution error

A

an individual’s tendency to attribute others actions to their character or personality, while attributing their own behavior to external situational factors outside of their control

we tend to attribute other people’s behavior to their personality or character traits, while overlooking the influence of situational factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cognitive ease
(fundamental attribution error)

A

Takes more effort to consider circumstances that account for why someone did something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Information asymmetry
(fundamental attribution error)

A

We know much more about what’s happening in our lives than we do random strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self-serving biases
(fundamental attribution error)

A

We want to protect our ego as much as possible to think well of ourselves so we give ourselves more grace than we do other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Interactionism

A

Behavior influenced by both individual and situation
Lewin’s Equation: B f(P,E)
Behavior as a function of Person and Environment
Person-Situation Interactions: Personality effect on behavior depends on situational characteristics
Situational Strength: Environmental cues for desirable behaviors
Personality Influence: Guides individuals to enter or avoid situations
Situational Alteration: Situations changed based on individual behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Strong situation

A

knowing what’s expected of you, strong cues that make you know what you should be doing
Sitting in a classroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Weak situation

A

fewer situational cues that signal what is expected of them
More room for personality to guide their behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Behavior is informed by both personal characteristics and situational factors

A

The impact of personality can depend on the situation, and vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Deindividuation

A

Concept: Hiding identity reduces personal accountability
Article Focus: Illusory anonymity
Explanation: Feeling anonymous, but it’s just psychological
Result: More deviant behavior due to reduced accountability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attitude

A

summary evaluation of an object
Person, place, event, etc
Relatively stable feeling/belief that is decided towards an object

Mood is more of a general state of feeling that doesn’t have a source of origin

Emotion is more a more intense reaction that is typically tied to an event that can disrupt your tasks throughout the day
Emotions can help us form our attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Affect

A

feeling and emotion centered
Ex– eating ice cream makes me happy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Behavior

A

actions relevant to the object
Ex– i eat ice cream often

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Cognition

A

thoughts and beliefs about the object
Ex– ice cream is sweet and has a smooth, satisfying texture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Understanding attitudes

A

The importance of an attitude, as assessed by how quickly it comes to mind
Stronger attitudes are more resistant to change, more predictive behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Influenced by attitude consistency
the degree of alignment between components of the tripartite model attitudes
26
Origin of Attitudes
Environmental vs. dispositional Heritability: Attitudes that are highly influenced by genetics are harder to change. Self-Perception Theory: People often look at their own behavior to figure out their attitudes. Equifinality Issue: Behavior can have multiple causes, not just one. Environmental Cues: Social interactions help shape our attitudes.
27
Cognitive dissonance
desire for consistency between thoughts, statements and behaviors When inconsistent, feeling of tension and anxiety arise Dissonance resolved though either behavioral or attitude change
28
Theory of planned behavior
attitudes lead to behavioral choices through people's intentions Attitude towards behavior, subjective norms, and behavioral control develop our intentions which leads to the attitudes and behavioral choices
29
Reciprocation
the normative expectation of mutual exchange Helps build social relationships with others Ex– free samples or gifts, door in the face technique
30
Door in the face technique (reciprocation)
following larger request with a smaller request so the person feels more indebted to say yes to the smaller request because they said no to the first one
31
Consistent
tendency to seek alignment in behaviors, beliefs, and attitudes Examples– foot in door technique, effectiveness of public commitment Foot in the door– asking for a small request will more likely lead to a yes to a bigger request down the line
32
Social validation
desire to align behavior with the behavior engaged in by others When other people engage in a behavior, we find it more acceptable to engage in that behavior
33
Liking
increased likelihood to be persuaded by those we like or admire Factors that increase liking– similarity, familiarity, cooperation, praise/compliments
34
Authority
increased likelihood to comply based on perceptions of competence or expertise Perception vs. true authority– more likely to listen to people that are better dressed or look smarter
35
Scarcity
tendency to assign higher values to items that are perceived as less available “Act now, limited time offer, only one left”
36
Forewarning
reminder to individuals that they are likely to encounter a persuasive situation Allows opportunity to develop counterarguments ahead of the influence attempt
37
Inoculation
build defenses against persuasion by mildly attacking the attitude position Providing examples of arguments and defense prior to influence attempt
38
Prejudice
unfair negative attitude toward a social group
39
Stereotypes
overgeneralizations about a group or its members
40
Discrimination
unjustified negative behaviors towards members of outgroups based on outgroup membership Behavioral manifestation
41
Explicit bias
attitudes and beliefs that we have about a person or group on a conscious level We are fully aware of these, so they can be self-reported openly expressed biases and actions
42
Implicit bias
unconscious attitudes that lie below the surface that we can consciously report Measure via behavioral means like IAT Implicit association test (IAT)-- assessment intended to detect subconscious associations between mental representations of objects in memory
43
Traditional prejudice
explicit Conscious statements, discriminatory acts Strategies to reduce traditional forms– Emphasize norms that prejudice is wrong and direct persuasive strategies Social validation– normalizing what behaviors are socially acceptable Present counter-stereotypical or non-stereotypic information about outgroup members
44
Contemporary prejudice
implicit People on the surface saying they don't have a bias, but evidence suggest there is underlying prejudice Strategies to reduce contemporary forms– Techniques that lead people to discover inconsistencies among their self-image, values and behaviors that may arouse feelings of guilt and tension
45
Cognitive dissonance
Strategies that emphasize intergroup processes like intergroup contact and social categorization and identity
46
Intergroup contact
Contact hypothesis– the prediction that increased intergroup contact will reduce prejudice Intergroup contact is particularly successful when groups Have equal status Are under cooperation (vs competitive) conditions Are allowed opportunities to interact socially Operate under egalitarian norms
47
Social categorization
When we automatically sort people into groups based on certain characteristics like race, gender, or nationality. Often results in us vs. them mentality
48
Decategorization
Making group differences less noticeable
49
Recategorization
Changing how groups are defined or categorized Important to retain positive distinctiveness– positive self-concept or image related to one's identity Still valuing the different identities people hold while also saying we are united and inclusive
50
Close relationships
relationships between people that are characterized by loving, caring, commitment, and intimacy Inclusive of romantic relationships, friendships, and family relationships
51
Interpersonal attractions
the level of attraction between people which leads to the development of platonic or romantic relationships Not always physical attraction, but the feeling of being drawn to a person
52
Similarity attraction paradigm
tendency for people to be attracted to those who are similar to themselves Similarity in Status If we feel like they have a higher status than us, insecurity happens because the person will feel like their partner will stray and be with someone that is more in their “league” Liking levels We like to invest in relationships when we feel like we are on the same page as the other person Mere exposure effect– the tendency to prefer stimuli (including, but not limited to, people) that we have seen frequently
53
Benefits of Expressing Gratitude
impact on Relationship Quality Communal Strength: Felt responsibility for partner's welfare Conceptualization: Personal sacrifice Distress/guilt Partner placement in communal hierarchy
54
Conditions for Causality
it should always be linked to the effect. It must happen before the effect. There shouldn't be any other reasonable explanations for the relationship
55
Studies on Gratitude and Communal Strength
Study 1: Cross-sectional survey Positive correlation found Study 2: Longitudinal survey Positive association over time Study 3: Experimental manipulation Gratitude expression highest Impacts self-perception and communal relationships
56
Self-concept
a knowledge representation of one's beliefs about oneself Cognitive and descriptive in nature Measuring self concept– “I am (please fill in the blank) Would best be considered as reflecting the cognitive component
57
Self-complexity
the extent to which individuals have different and independent ways of thinking about themselves Complexity associated with more positive outcomes, as it acts as a buffer in times of threat
58
Self-esteem
positive or negative feelings we have about ourselves how you feel about something with respect to your self-concept Would be best considered as reflecting the affect component
59
Self-affirmation theory
feeling good about one part of ourselves can make it easier to handle criticism or challenges in other parts of our lives.
60
Self efficacy
individual belief in your ability to reach specific goals or accomplish particular tasks ex-- do I believe I have the ability to eat more fruits and veggies?
61
Response efficacy
whether we think doing something will actually have the effect we want it to have Do I believe eating more fruits and veggies will actually benefit my health?
62
Altruism
doing good things for others without expecting anything in return
63
Kin altruism
behaving to benefit a genetic relatives change of survival at some cost to ones won changes
64
Reciprocal altruism
helping based on the normative expectation of mutual exchange
65
Pure altruism
helping someone from a place of empathy, knowing no self benefit will come
66
Bystander effect
phenomenon where individuals are less likely to help someone in need in the presence of others Diffusion of responsibility– assumption that other will take action, leading to personal inaction Kitty genovese
67
Good samaritan laws
legal protection to people who give reasonable assistance to those in need Some form in all 50 states
68
Duty to rescue laws
impose penalty for those who do not help in circumstances of danger Less frequent in the united states, more often duty to report
69
Big Five Academic Achievement article
Study: Examined 308 undergraduates' personality traits, learning styles, and GPA. Findings: Two Big Five traits, conscientiousness and agreeableness, positively related to all learning styles. Neuroticism negatively related to all learning styles. Extraversion and openness positively related to elaborative processing. Combined, Big Five traits explained 14% of GPA variance; learning styles added 3%. Openness linked to GPA via reflective learning styles (synthesis-analysis, elaborative processing). Conclusion: Personality and learning styles both impact academic performance; integrating intellectual curiosity with thoughtful processing enhances GPA.
70
Strategies for Reducing Prejudice article
Focus: Addressing both traditional and contemporary forms of prejudice. Traditional Prejudice: Targeted via direct education and attitude-change techniques. Contemporary Prejudice: May require alternative strategies. Individual-Oriented Techniques: Identify inconsistencies in self-image, values, and behaviors to evoke negative emotions (e.g., guilt), motivating attitude change. Intergroup Strategies: Aim to personalize interactions, redefine group boundaries, and foster inclusive representations. Goal: Understanding prejudice's nature informs effective interventions for both traditional and contemporary prejudice.
71
Benefits of expressing gratitude article
Objective: Investigate if expressing gratitude enhances perception of relationship communal strength. Study 1: Cross-sectional survey (N = 137) showed expressing gratitude linked to higher perception of relationship communal strength. Study 2: Longitudinal study (N = 218) found expressing gratitude predicted increased perception of communal strength over time. Study 3: Experimental study (N = 75) showed participants who expressed gratitude had higher perceived communal strength compared to control conditions. Conclusion: Expressing gratitude boosts perception of relationship communal strength. Implications: Highlights importance of gratitude expression in fostering strong relationships.
72
Self-Affirmation Promotes Health Behavior Change article
Objective: Test if self-affirmation can increase fruit and vegetable consumption, exploring mediation by efficacy variables. Procedure: Exposed to health message after task, efficacy measures taken immediately, followed by 7-day fruit and vegetable consumption diary. Results: Self-affirmed participants ate significantly more fruit and vegetables (approx. 5.5 portions increase) compared to controls. Effect mediated by response-efficacy. Conclusion: Self-affirmation interventions can effectively influence health-promoting behaviors. Implication: Highlights the potential of self-affirmation in promoting positive health behaviors.