Exclusion Clauses Flashcards Preview

Contract Law - Contents Of Contract > Exclusion Clauses > Flashcards

Flashcards in Exclusion Clauses Deck (17):
1

Explain what governs exclusion clauses briefly

Common law is first assessed to see if the exclusion clause is valid
It will then have to be assessed by statute

2

What are the two test under common law?

Haw the clause been properly incorporated?
Does it cover the loss caused?

3

What arises under how the term has been incorporated?

General rule: the term must be bought the the attention of the other party before/at the time of contracting
Bound by terms even if didn't read/understand them
If misrepresentation was involved the clause is ineffective
Clauses can be incorporated through previous dealings
Clauses can be incorporated on a ticket

4

What case is related to the general rule?

Parker v South Eastern Railway

5

Facts of Parker v South Eastern Railway

C's luggage was stolen from train storage
On the pack of his storage ticket there was a clause saying they were not liable for loss more than £10
Railway claimed they were not liable because of this

6

Outcome of Parker v South Eastern Railway

Court held they were liable because they needed to be more efficient in bringing it to C's attention
Cannot be aware of a clause if you didn't know about it

7

What case is related to being bound by a clause even if you didn't read/understand it

L'Estrange v Graucob

8

Facts of L'Estrange v Graucob

C bought a ciggerette machine which turned out to be faulty
She had not read the contract which contained an exclusion clause prohibiting her from a warranty

9

Outcome of L'Estrange v Graucob

Her claim was unsuccessful because she was bound by the exclusion clause

10

What case is relevant to having previous dealings?

Spurling v Bradshaw

11

Facts of Spurling v Bradshaw

D was contracted to store things
On one occasion C delivered barrels of orange juice
A few days later D received a document which acknowledged the receipt - if claimed an exempt clause from loss or damage from negligence
C collected barrels and they were empty and refused to pay
C sued

12

Outcome of Spurling v Bradshaw

They tried to claim because they were not made aware of it the exclusion clause could not apply
Court said because they have dealt for many years and this clause has applied in other contracts of there's then they were aware and had to pay

13

How do you determine if the clause covers the loss?

With the contra proferentum rule

14

What is the contra proferentum rule?

It establishes if there is any ambiguity in the clause then it will favour the claimant

15

What case is relevant to the contra proferentum rule?

Houghton v Trafalgar insurance co

16

Facts of Houghton v Trafalgar insurance co

C's motor insurance policy provided he could not rely on the insurance if the vehicle carried an 'excess load'.
C had an accident while driving with 6 people in a 5 person car

17

Outcome of Houghton v Trafalgar insurance co

Courts applied the contra proferentum rule and said that excess load could mean weight or people. His claim was successful