Exemption Clauses Flashcards

0
Q

Wallis, Son & Wells v Pratt & Haynes

A

Narrow reading of exemption clauses - the inadequacy of the seed sold here was a condition and the exemption clause only covered warranties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society

A

Lord Hoffman’s restatement of interpretation affects this area but may have overstated the case somewhat - as Lord Wilberforce said, ‘one should not readily discard reasoned authority’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ailsa Craig Fishing Co v Malvern Fishing Co and Securicor

A

Although a narrow interpretation is applied to both exemption and limitation clauses, this is applied more rigourously to the former

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Andrew Bros (Bournemouth) v Singer & Co

A

The exemption clause only excluded implied terms, not express ones, the contract was for the sale of new cars and the car sold was not new

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Karsales (Harrow) v Wallis

A

The exemption clause could not apply, the agreement related to a car and the car that had been provided was so badly damaged that it could no longer be considered a car as it was incapable of self-propulsion - the issue with this is where is the line drawn? When is a car a car?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Harbutt’s Plasticine v Wayne Tank and Pump Co

A

Denning tried to assert that a contract ceased to exist once it had been terminated, this cannot because the contract is where the injured party derives its right to a remedy from and the same applies to exemption clauses - overruled by HL in Photo Productions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Photo Production v Securicor Transport

A

Overruled Denning in Harbutt’s - here the clause was effective in shielding Securicor from liability - they had only charged a modest sum and were unaware of the premises potential safety issues, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Canada Steamship v The King

A

The exclusion of liability for negligence - the clause did exclude liability for negligence, but it was so wide that it incorporated other liabilities, which were controlled by statute - the Crown was therefore not shielded - liability can be expressly and impliedly excluded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hollier v Rambler Motors

A

Not validly incorporated to exclude negligence, but, even if it had it was insufficient - ‘the language should be so plain that it clearly bears that meaning’ Salmon LJ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly