Offer and Acceptance Flashcards

0
Q

Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking

A

Vending machines are not ITT - the terms on ticket come after the offer has been accepted as the acceptee cannot refuse them - therefore unincorporated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Fisher v Bell

A

Distinction between an offer and an ITT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Chapelton

A

This was actually an offer - even though enough stages for an ITT - the reason being that otherwise the C could sit there for an hour without paying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Carlill

A

Unilateral - performance of a specific action, offer is usually money - contrasted with bilateral contracts, the two parties agree to be bound; not agreement here

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Harvey v Facey

A

NB the difference with land - not so readily traded - communication RE the price would seem to be an offer (why else communicate it) but this was not construed as such

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Gibson v Manc CC

A

Lord Denning was criticised - this was an ITT (unlike Denning’s broad, contextual construction at CA) - this shows the friction between the narrow and broad constructions - it was an ITT because of ‘may be prepared to’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Payne v Cave

A

Auction - similar to ITT - the placing of the bid is the offer and the fall of the hammer is the acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Warlow v Harrison

A

An auctioneer who refused to sell a horse which was at auction ‘without reserve’ meant that the auctioneer could be sued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Spencer v Harding

A

Tender - a circular could not be construed as an offer, it was a mere proclamation of their willingness to sell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Blackpool and Fylde Aeroclub

A

Tender - this was unilateral because the council had failed to take into account C’s tender like they had promised to do - the council were therefore liable for breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hyde v Wrench

A

Counter-offer - offered to pay 950 instead of 1000 - this would seem to be effectively the same price prima facie, but all the D had to do was write back to accept, which he didn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Stevenson v McLean

A

NOT Counter-Offer - this was merely a request for more information - be careful to distinguish between these and Hyde v Wrench

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BRS v Arthur Crutchley

A

Battle of the forms - here the delivery note was an offer, which the stamp of alternative terms was a counter-offer and the delivery driver accepted by conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Routledge v Grant

A

The C has a right to withdraw just as the D has a right to withdraw - providing this has been done before acceptance there is no contract - even with a duration e.g. 6 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mountford v Scott

A

Option - if consideration has been given to keep an offer open, even if it is nominal, then the offeror cannot withdraw the offer during this time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Byrne & Co

A

The offeree had accepted before it was withdrawn - postal rule

16
Q

Shuey v US

A

RE Unilateral withdrawal - the offeror must sufficiently publicise the withdrawal of the offer even if C himself does not hear of it

17
Q

Ramsgate Victoria Hotel

A

Lapse of an offer - too long

18
Q

Williams v Cawardine

A

Knowledge of the offer is deduced from the circumstances and the motivation for accepting is irrelevant

19
Q

Tinn v Hoffman

A

Cross offers cannot form a contract; there needs to be acceptance of one

20
Q

R v Clarke

A

Here, if the C does not know of the true nature of the offer e.g. to evade criminal charges and get money (he knew only of former) then he can gain what he knew of

21
Q

Luxor v Cooper

A

Failure to accept a unilateral offer - they had to find someone to BUY the property, which they didn’t because the Ds found someone elsewhere - no acceptance

22
Q

Errington v Errington

A

Acceptance of a unilateral offer - once performance has begun, the offer cannot be withdrawn, even if it has not been fully completed

23
Q

Brogden v Metropolitan Railway

A

Acceptance by conduct: receiving a counter-offer and placing in a drawer was considered to be acceptance

24
Q

British Steel Corp. v Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co.

A

No contract had come into being as no agreement had been reached, however, the Cs succeeded on a quantum merit claim

25
Q

Felthouse v Bindley

A

Silence is not acceptance

26
Q

Re Selectmove

A

Here, silence was acceptance - where an offeree himself indicates that an offer is to be deemed as accepted ‘if you hear not further’ then it is an exceptional circumstance where silence is acceptance

27
Q

Eliason v Henshaw

A

No valid contract as transmission of acceptance had taken longer than what had been stated as sufficient in the offer

28
Q

The Brimnes

A

An acceptance communicated in office hours, but not seen, was the D’s own fault and there had therefore been acceptance

29
Q

Adams v Lindsell

A

Postal rule - acceptance takes effect when posted

30
Q

Household Fire Insurance Co

A

Even if the offeror never receives the acceptance it is nonetheless a binding contract

31
Q

Holwell Securities

A

Exception to the postal rule - where acceptance being communicated (here for an option) is so fundamental that when the letter didn’t arrive it didn’t constitute acceptance

32
Q

LJ Korbetis

A

Misdirected communication is not acceptance