EXPEPSY - EXPEPSY lesson 2 Flashcards

(59 cards)

1
Q

what is right what is wrong

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Different standards that a researcher should follow while conducting their research

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

framework of values within which we conduct research

A

RESEARCH ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

help researchers identify actions we consider good and bad

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain the principles by which we make responsible decisions in actual situations

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Guided to come up in ethical decisions

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Important, ensure fairness, calmness, protection for the participants

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

maintain integrity, resulting in reliable and honest results, builds trust holds researcher accountable

A

ETHICS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

IRB

A

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Composed of laypeople and researchers, evaluate research proposals to ensure that they follow ethical standards

A

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. First task is to decide whether a proposed study increases participants risk of injury since psychological research can cause physical and/or psychological discomfort
  2. Accurately estimate the degree of risk in the research. Typically, do this by reading the literature and consulting with colleagues
  3. Help researchers estimate the degree of risk involved in their studies
A

OBJECTIVES OF INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Protect the safety of research participants

A

OBJECTIVES OF INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

increases the chance of harm compared with not participating in the study

A

At risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

do not increase the likelihood of injury

A

Minimal risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When a risk/benefit analysis determines that gains in knowledge outweight risks to participants

A

APPROVED AT RISK STUDY by IRB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 Principles of THE BELMONT REPORT

A

Respect for person
Beneficence
Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Individuals have the right of self-determination (basis of informed consent)

A

Respect for persons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Minimize harm and maximize potential benefits (basis of risk/benefit analysis)

A

Beneficence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Fairness in both the burdens and benefits of research

A

Justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

obligation of a physician not to harm the patient

A

NONMALEFICENCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

A subject/guardian agrees in writing to the subject’s participation after explaining relevant details of the experiment

A

INFORMED CONSENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Description may include risks and benefits but doesn’t extend to deception or the hypothesis

A

INFORMED CONSENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Most crucial principle built into ethics codes is the right of a participant to refuse to be in the study or discontinue participation

A

INFORMED CONSENT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ethical researchers, therefore must refrain from coercing participants to agree to be in the study or prevent participants from discontinuing the study

A

INFORMED CONSENT

25
apply to psychologists and students when they assume the role of psychologist during research or practice
APA ETHICAL GUIDELINES
26
used when its the best way to obtain information
DECEPTION
27
may not be used to minimize the participants’ perception of risk or exaggerate their perception of potential benefits
DECEPTION
28
_ must be allowed to withdraw from the experiment at any time and should never face coercion to remain
SUBJECTS
29
The experimenter should provide a _ (full disclosure) after either their personal participation or the completion of the entire study
DEBRIEFING
30
Involves explaining the true nature and purpose of the experiment
DEBRIEFING
31
Essential component of good experimental research
DEBRIEFING
32
Must offer our participants a full explanation of our study every time we use deception
DEBRIEFING
33
an experimenter's accomplice
CONFEDERATE
34
Helps researcher creates situation necessary for the experiments, that would be hard to achieve if it were only the participants.
CONFEDERATE
35
Can influence people's reactions, decisions and actions allowing researchers to study social influence, obedience and memory
CONFEDERATE
36
Useful to stipulate real-life situations
CONFEDERATE
37
Using a confederate is deceptive bec subjects are led to believe that the confederate is another subject, experimenter or bystander when they're actually part of the experimental manipulation
CONFEDERATE DECEPTIVE
38
explaining the true nature and purpose of the study to the subject at the end of their participation or the completion of the entire experiment
DEBRIEFING/ FULL DISCLOSURE
39
an experimenter discloses the true nature and purpose of the study to the subject and solicits the subject's questions at the end of the experiment
DEBRIEFING
40
subjects are not identified by name
ANONIMITY
41
Researchers achieve _ by collecting data without names and assigning code number
ANONIMITY
42
data are securely stored and only used for the purpose explained to the subject
CONFIDENTIALITY
43
the humane care and treatment of animals
Animal Welfare
44
Minimizing pain and distress Appropriate use of species
Animal Welfare
45
IACUC
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
46
Institutions that conduct animal research must establish an _ to evaluate animal research before it's conducted
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
47
must determine that the researchers have explored all alternatives and have documented that there are no other feasible alternatives.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
48
are the position that sensate species (those that can feel pain and suffer) have equal value and rights to humans
Animal rights
49
falsifying or fabricating data
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
50
A researcher's graduation, tenure, promotion, funding or reputation may motivate researchers to commit this fraud
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD
51
PEER REVIEW REPLICATION COMPETITION
DEFENSE LINES AGAINST FRAUD
52
process filters submitted manuscripts so that only 15-20% of articles are printed
PEER REVIEW
53
where researchers attempt to reproduce the finding of others
REPLICATION
54
by colleagues for scarce resources while a cause of fraud
COMPETITION
55
misrepresenting someone's ideas, words or written work as your own
PLAGIARISM
56
a form of fraud in which an individual claims false credit for another's ideas, words, or written work
PLAGIARISM
57
_ credit should only be given to those who made a major contribution to the research or writing
Authorship credit
58
_ should not take credit for the same research more than once
Researchers
59
The ethical solution is to _ original publications when republishing data in a journal article or republishing journal articles in an edited volume
cite