experiments Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

important studies

A

milgram, bandura

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

laboratory experiments

A

controlled environment to test hypotheses

experimental group - where the independent variable is changed

control group - no change to independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

practical strengths of lab experiments

A

cost / time - can be done quite quickly if facilities are readily available and at little cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

practical limitations of lab experiments

A

control of variables - society is complex - cant control all variables

snapshot - no historical dimension

small sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ethical strength of lab studies

A

beneficial for society - provide outcomes useful to society

debriefing - negate some issues of lack of informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ethical limitation of lab experiments

A

informed consent - some people may not understand the nature of the experiment

harm - can cause distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

theoretical strengths of lab experiments

A

reliability - can be repeated and statistical analysis checked

detachment

objectivity

cause and effect

positivism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

theoretical limitations of lab experiments

A

validity - part of experiment - hawthorne effect

ecological validity

representativeness - small scale

interpretivism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

positivist perspective on lab experiments

A

favour lab experiments - causal laws to be established
- manipulation of independent variable and measuring effect on dependent variable

objective - valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

interpretivist perspective on lab experiments

A

do not produce valid, accurate data - artificial environment and do not encourage natural behaviour

cannot reveal how interactions occur between people and only produce a snap shot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

feminist perspective on lab experiments

A

create an unequal power relationship between dominant research and compliant participant

often male scientist - ignore female experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

field experiments

A

take place in subject’s natural environment

Rosenthal and Jacobson - pygmalion in classroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

practical strengths of field experiments

A

access - study groups who would not grant access in controlled setting- Rosenhan - students admitted to psychiatric hospitals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

practical limitations of field experiments

A

access - small number of participants due to opportunistic sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ethical strengths of field experiments

A

useful for society - field experiments tell sociologists about how individuals behave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ethical limitations of field experiments

A

informed consent - often deceived about the true nature of the research or unaware part of experiment - covert study

17
Q

theoretical strengths of field experiments

A

validity - research takes place in wider society so people should behave more natural manner

validity - true nature of research is often kept covert - less impact of expectancy effect and hawthorne effect

18
Q

theoretical limitation of field experiments

A

validity - if know part of experiment - hawthorne effect

control of variables - harder to control variables in the field

reliability - difficult to accurately replicate

19
Q

positivist perspectives of field experiments

A

lack in validity - harder to control extraneous variables that may affect participant behaviour separately from independent variable

reduces objectivity of field experiments and minimises accuracy of patterns of causation

20
Q

interpretivists perspectives on field experiments

A

favour over lab experiments

involve observations and analysis of more natural behaviour

argue the structured nature of field experiments and resulting quantitative data limits validity

does say why for behaviour - triangulation

21
Q

the comparative method

A

cause and effect relationships

groups identified by sociologist for being similar is all aspects bar one variable we are interested in then compare groups

22
Q

practical strengths of comparative method

A

fewer responses needed - reducing need for expenses and training

23
Q

practical limitation of comparative method

A

control over variables - harder to accurately control all relevant variables so limited validity and research may not be relevant

24
Q

ethical strength of comparative method

A

ethical issues - should avoid issues of causing harm and gaining informed consent

25
ethical limitations of comparative method
sensitive issues - involves analysing data and establishing causal laws through the inductive meethod - cold and clinical way of researching sensitive topics eg suicide - Durkheim
26
theoretical strengths of comparative method
artificiality - less artificial than studying groups in laboratory so should have higher ecological validity historical - can be used to study past events and groups
27
theoretical limitations of comparative method
a thought experiment - groups selected may differ by more than one variable validity - data you collect may not be accurate
28
positivist perspective on comparative method
if conducted using quantitative data - good way of establishing causal laws involves induction - sociologists analyses evidence in objective way and creates hypothesis
29
interpretivist perspective on comparative method
does not favour comparative method due to the reliance on quantitative data that can easily be distorted to lack validity