explanations of attachment - Bowlby's theory Flashcards
(15 cards)
why did Bowlby reject learning theory
he looked at Lorenz and Harlow for ideas and proposed an evolutionary explanation stating attachment was innate and that it gives us a survival advantage
meaning of monotropic
emphasis on a child’s attachment to one particular caregiver which was different and more important than others
what are Bowlby’s two principles
the law of continuity
the law of accumulated separation
what is the law of continuity
stated that the more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better quality of the attachments
what is the law of accumulated separation
states that the effects of every separation from the mother add up and the safest dose is a zero dose
ASCMI
A = adaptive behaviours
its an evolutionary
helps aid infants personal survival skills
like Lorenz’s goslings
S = social releasers
babies are born with a set of innate ‘cute’ behaviours like smiling and cooing
this encourages attention from adults and activates adult social interaction
adult attaches to the baby
C = critical period
6 months - 2 years
it is also viewed as a ‘sensitive’ period (up to 5 years)
if an attachment is not formed then it will be much harder to form an attachment later in life
M = monotropy
infants form one intense attachment with their mother
I = internal working model
the child forms a mental representation of their relationship with their primary attachment figure
the relationship serves as a model for what relationships are like
the childs first relationship will affect their ability to form quality relationships in the future
how does the internal working model affect the childs ability to be a parent
people base their parenting behaviours on their own experiences of being parented
AO3
+P: support for the role of social releasers
Brazetton
babies trigger interactions with adults by using social releasers
+P: support for the internal working model
Bailey et al (2007)
assessed attachment relationships in caregivers and previous caregivers
found that mothers with poor attachment to their primary attachment figure were more likely to have a poor attachment with their children
-P: the concepet of monotropy lacks validity
Shaffer and Emerson suggest Bowlby may be incorrect
27% of the children they studied formed an attachment to their mother and father at the same time
-P: feminist concerns
Burman (1994)
this belief causes mothers to take the blame for anything that goes wrong for their child in the future
excuses women to be restricted just to child rearing and preventing them form returning to work