Family Flashcards
(140 cards)
Key Sociologists
- Parsons
- Zaretsky
- Delphy & Leonard
- Willmott & Young
- Oakley
- Rapoport and Rapoport
Talcott Parsons
- functionalist
- family seen as a crucial institution that performs functions for well-being of society
- theoretical approach
- based on existing sociological studies - secondary research
- key findings:
- primary socialisation is one of key functions of family
- transmission of norms and values to next gen
- stabilisation of adult personalities (SOAP) - family meets emotional and psychological needs of adults - warm bath theory
- gender roles - instrumental and expressive roles
- males take on instrumental role as breadwinner, women take on expressive role of nurturing
- nuclear family structure best suited to meet needs of modern societies
- criticisms:
- overemphasis on harmony and consensus
- neglect of family diversity
- gender role stereotypes
- static view of family roles
Zaretsky
- marxist
- historical and theoretical analysis
- reviewed historical documents
- analysed economic systems
- key findings:
- family is a haven from harsh realities of capitalism - an escape from work
- family performs an economic function - creating new workers and providing unpaid labour
- role of women in family is providing unpaid labour which allows males to contribute to capitalism
- alienation and isolation - capitalism creates stress and tension
- family encourages consumption
- criticisms:
- overemphasis on economic factors
- idealisation of pre-capitalist families
- work on gender roles don’t reflect modern families
- lack of diversity of family types
Delphy and leonard
- feminists
- qualitative methods
- unstructured interviews
- observations of everyday life
- examined roles and responsibilities in family
- key findings:
- unequal distribution of work in family
- emotional labour taken on by women
- economic dependence of women on men
- patriarchal control in the family
- women had a double burden - developing on work of Oakley
- gender roles reinforced through social expectations
- family is a place of exploitation and oppression for women
- women have burden of physical and emotional labour in the home
- movement towards greater equality in domestic labour
Willmott and young
- functionalist
- key findings:
- pre-industrial family - large and extended
- early industrial family - process of urbanisation and industrialisation
- symmetrical family - more equal role
- asymmetrical family - divided leisure time reflection of upper class
- qualitative and quantitative methods
- large-scale surveys to collect data from broad section of households
- interviews with family member to gain deeper insights into attitudes and experiences of family life
- key findings:
- more equal roles in symmetrical family
- shared decision making
- increased leisure time together - socialising as a family unit
- influence of technology and improvement in living standards
- reduced housework making it easier to share tasks
- greater geographical mobility
- criticisms:
- overgeneralised findings - not representative of social class and cultural backgrounds
- idealised view of family life
- ignored lone-parent households
- changes over time make it dated compared to recent findings
Oakley
- feminist
- qualitative methods
- unstructured interviews with housewives
- observations of household routines
- surveys to collect data
- key findings:
- inequality in domestic labour - housework and childcare responsibility of women
- lack of fulfilment and social interactions faced by women
- feelings of loneliness and dissatisfaction
- lack of recognition - work often taken for granted
- negative impacts on mental health
- frustration, resentment and low self-esteem
- criticisms:
- sample size was small and limited generalisability of findings
- changing dynamics with more flexible roles
- focus on negative aspects - some women find satisfaction in homemaker roles
Rapoport and Rapoport
- pluralists
- qualitative and quantitative
- surveys
- interviews - with family members
- case studies - specific family cases to illustrate diversity
- key findings:
- CLOGS
- Cultural diversity
- Life-course diversity
- Organisational diversity
- Generational (/cohort) diversity
- Social class diversity
- no single dominant family type, rather family diversity
- based on cultural and individual preferences
- changing gender roles and dynamics
- greater flexibility and adaptation in contemporary family life
- organise to support the needs of family members
- social and economic influences lead to differences in family organisation
- criticisms:
- over-emphasis on diversity
- limited longitudinal data - not over time but a snapshot
- cultural bias
- impacts of policy changes
Overview of cultural diversity
- Britain is characterised by a rich mix of cultural, ethnic, and religious groups, with over 300 languages spoken in London alone.
- Historical migration patterns include significant movements from Ireland in the 19th century and from former colonies like India and Pakistan post-World War II.
- The interplay of immigration and emigration shapes the demographic landscape, influencing family structures and social dynamics.
Family formation patterns
- Different ethnic groups exhibit distinct family formation patterns; for instance, African-Caribbean mothers may continue full-time work post-childbirth, contrasting with traditional Asian family roles emphasising full-time motherhood.
- Second-generation migrants are showing shifts in these traditional patterns, indicating evolving family dynamics.
- Cultural diversity leads to varied expectations and roles within families, challenging monolithic views of family life.
data on solo living by ethnic group
- The 2011 census data reveals varying proportions of individuals living alone across ethnic groups, with White British individuals having the highest percentage at 16.4%.
- The bar chart data highlights the need for careful interpretation of statistics to understand the complexities of family structures across different ethnicities.
stereotypes and realities
family relationships and class
british asian families
- Common stereotypes suggest that British Asian families are male-dominated and traditional, but research by Westwood and Bhachu (1988) challenges these views, highlighting diversity within Asian families.
- The notion of ‘the Asian family’ is often oversimplified, ignoring the variations based on religion, social class, and individual family dynamics.
- British Asian families are portrayed as resilient against societal racism, showcasing strength and adaptability.
class differences in family dynamics
Sociological perspectives suggest that family relationships can vary significantly by social class, with middle-class families often exhibiting more egalitarian roles compared to working-class families.
However, evidence indicates that working-class fathers may be more involved in childcare than their middle-class counterparts, complicating the narrative of class-based family dynamics.
Understanding these differences is crucial for a nuanced view of family life in Britain.
trends in multigenerational living
- Data from 2001 indicates that 10% of Bangladeshi and Pakistani households contained multigenerational families, compared to lower percentages in White British and Black Caribbean households.
- The presence of multigenerational households can be linked to cultural values, economic factors, and social support systems within ethnic communities.
- Discussions around the advantages and disadvantages of multigenerational living highlight both social cohesion and potential conflicts.
advantages and disadvantages of multigen households
- Advantages of multigenerational households may include shared financial responsibilities, emotional support, and childcare assistance.
- Disadvantages can involve generational conflicts, lack of privacy, and differing values or lifestyles among family members.
- The dynamics of these households can vary widely based on cultural backgrounds and individual family circumstances.
complexity of defining family
- The term ‘family’ encompasses a range of meanings, from nuclear families to extended relatives, and can vary based on context.
- Sociologists emphasise the need for precision in defining family to accurately study its structures and functions in society.
- Different definitions can lead to varied interpretations of family dynamics and roles within different cultural contexts.
contemporary family structures
- Traditional definitions of family, such as the nuclear family model, are increasingly seen as inadequate to describe the diversity of family forms in modern Britain.
- Cohabitation, civil partnerships, and single-parent families are now common, reflecting changing societal norms and values.
- Understanding these contemporary structures is essential for sociological research and policy-making.
traditional definitions of family
- A family is traditionally defined as a group based on marriage, blood ties, and shared residence.
- This definition is criticised for being too narrow, as it excludes various family types present in modern society.
- Examples of excluded family types include same-sex families, lone-parent families, and reconstituted families.
- The need for a broader definition arises from the increasing diversity of family structures in the UK today.
- Sociologists argue for precision in terminology to accurately reflect the complexities of family dynamics.
sociological perspectives of family
understanding family definitions
- Allan and Crow emphasize the importance of precise terminology in sociological studies of family.
- A broad definition of family allows for the inclusion of various relationships and household arrangements.
- Some sociologists prefer the term ‘families’ to acknowledge the diversity of family forms.
- The shift towards broader definitions reflects societal changes and the acceptance of different family types.
types of family in the uk
- nuclear family
- extended family
- lone-parent family
- reconstituted family
nuclear family
- A nuclear family consists of two parents (father and mother) and their dependent children living together.
- This family type can include married couples or cohabiting partners.
- Nuclear families are often seen as the traditional family structure, but they are just one of many forms.
- The nuclear family is characterised by its simplicity and direct lineage, typically involving two generations.
extended family
- Extended families include relatives beyond the nuclear family, often comprising three generations living together or nearby.
- Vertical extension involves grandparents living with parents and children, while horizontal extension includes aunts, uncles, and cousins.
- Modified extended families maintain regular contact despite geographical separation, such as children studying away from home.
- The concept of extended families reflects cultural values of support and connection across generations.
lone-parent family
- A lone-parent family consists of one parent raising one or more dependent children.
- The majority of lone-parent families in the UK are headed by women, often due to divorce, separation, or widowhood.
- In 2015, only 10% of lone-parent families were headed by men, highlighting gender dynamics in family structures.
- Lone-parent families face unique challenges, including financial strain and social stigma.
reconstituted family
- Reconstituted families, also known as blended families or step-families, involve one or both partners having children from previous relationships.
- This family type often includes a step-parent and can involve complex dynamics between biological and step-parents.
- Reconstituted families may arise from divorce or the death of a partner, leading to new family formations.
- The blending of families can create both challenges and opportunities for relationship building.
family household vs household
- A household is defined as one person living alone or a group sharing a residence and at least one meal a day.
- Family households consist of family members living together, while non-family households may include friends or unrelated individuals.
- The rise of one-person households has been significant, increasing from 6.6 million in 1996 to 7.7 million in 2015.
- This trend reflects changing societal norms, including delayed marriage and increased life expectancy.