FCA ART 3 VOLUME 4 Flashcards
(50 cards)
340.1. Time of fact-finding hearing.*
The fact-finding hearing must commence within the time limitations set out in Sec. 340.1. The time for the hearing depends on whether the respondent is in detention or at liberty.
If the respondent is “in detention” and the highest count in the petition charges a CLASS A, B OR C FELONY, the fact finding hearing shall commence not more than ___________________ after the conclusion of the initial appearance
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
340.1. Time of fact-finding hearing.*
- The fact-finding hearing must commence within the time limitations set out in Sec. 340.1. The time for the hearing depends on whether the respondent is in detention or at liberty.
- If the respondent is “in detention” and the highest count in the petition charges less than a CLASS C FELONY,the fact finding hearing shall commence not more than ___________ after the conclusion of the initial appearance
THREE (3) DAYS
340.1. Time of fact-finding hearing.*
The fact-finding hearing must commence within the time limitations set out in Sec. 340.1. The time for the hearing depends on whether the respondent is in detention or at liberty.
If the respondent is “not in detention”, the fact finding hearing shall commence not “ more than ___________ after the conclusion of the initial appearance
SIXTY (60) DAYS
340.1. Time of fact-finding hearing.*
The fact finding hearing may be adjourned on the court’s own motion or on motion of the presentment agency for _________ if the respondent is in detention and for _________ if he is not in detention
On motion of the respondent, the adjournment shall be not more than ___________, and on the court’s own motion for not more than ________ FOR AN ACOD
THREE (3) DAYS………. THIRTY (30) DAYS…… THIRTY (30) DAYS….. SIX (6) MONTHS
340.1. Time of fact-finding hearing.*
Successive motions to adjourn (beyond the time allowed for good cause stated above), SHALL NOT be granted absent a showing of __________
SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.
340.1. Time of fact-finding hearing.*
Warrant- period of time that the Respondent is absent from court due to a warrant is (INCLUDED/EXCUDED)
EXCLUDED`
340.2. Presiding judge.*
The judge who presides over the commencement of the fact finding hearing shall continue to preside over it until its completion as well as all other subsequent proceedings unless unable due to illness, disability, vacation or other causes
340.2. Presiding judge.*
The judge who presides over the commencement of the fact finding hearing shall continue to preside over it until its completion as well as all other subsequent proceedings unless unable due to illness, disability, vacation or other causes
341.1. Exclusion of the general public.*
The general public (MAY/MAY NOT) be excluded from any proceeding under this article
MAY
341.2. Presence of respondent and his or her parent.*
- The respondent and his counsel (MAY/SHALL) be personally present at any hearing under this article and at the initial appearance
- Similarly in the CPL if the respondent conducts himself in so disorderly a manner he (MAY/SHALL) be removed after being warned and the behavior continues
SHALL….. MAY
341.2. Presence of respondent and his or her parent.*
- The respondent’s parent or other person responsible for his care shall be personally present at any hearing under this article and at the initial appearance;
- the court (CAN/CANNOT) proceed without them following reasonable and substantial effort to notify
CAN
342.1. The fact-finding hearing; order of procedure.*
The order of the fact finding hearing shall be as follows:
- The court shall permit opening addresses with the presentment agency first
- The presentment agency must offer evidence
- The respondent may offer evidence
- The court may permit rebuttal and surrebuttal evidence
- (Rebuttal evidence is evidence submitted to contradict or nullify the evidence of the opposing party.
- Surrebuttal evidence is evidence submitted by the opposed party to contradict or nullify the rebuttal evidence. i.e to rebut the rebuttal)
- At the conclusion of the evidence the respondent shall have a right to deliver a summation followed by the presentment agency
- The court must then consider the case and enter a finding
PaRa PuE RaE RaPa
Kick punch it’s all in the mind
342.2- Evidence in fact-finding hearings; required quantum
Only evidence that is ____________ may be admitted and any determination that the respondent committed the act must be based upon PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT (the criminal standard)
COMPETENT, MATERIAL AND RELEVANT
FUTURECLERK HINT: “C MR BRD” (SEE MR. BiRD)
342.2- Evidence in fact-finding hearings; required quantum
Only evidence that is COMPETENT, MATERIAL AND RELEVANT may be admitted and any determination that the respondent committed the act must be based upon _____________ (the criminal standard)
PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
FUTURECLERK HINT: “C MR BRD” (SEE MR. BeRD)
342.2- Evidence in fact-finding hearings; required quantum
An order of removal pursuant to CPL 725 constitutes______________ that they responded committed the acts enumerated in the order of removal.
{An order of removal pursuant to a direction authorized by sections 220.10 (the defendant plead to an offense), 310.85 Verdict of guilty where defendant not criminally responsible and 330.25 Removal after verdict where a defendant is a juvenile offender or Murder 2 of the CPL constitutes ____________ and a determination that the respondent did the act or acts specified therein in accordance with section 725.05 of the criminal procedure law.}
proof beyond a reasonable doubt
343.1. Rules of evidence; testimony given by children.*
Any person may testify as a witness in a delinquency proceeding.
Every witness more than _________ may testify ONLY under oath unless the court orders otherwise
NINE (9) YEARS OLD
Hint:”Nein” in German means “NO”
343.1. Rules of evidence; testimony given by children.*
Any person may testify as a witness in a delinquency proceeding
A witness under _________ may NOT testify under oath unless the court is satisfied he understands the nature of the oath
NINE (9) YEARS OLD
Hint:”Nein” in German means “NO”
343.1. Rules of evidence; testimony given by children.*
All children may testify (sworn or unsworn) unless the court believes that the child does not possess the sufficient intelligence or capacity to justify the reception of the evidence.
A respondent (MAY/MAY NOT) be found delinquent based SOLELY on the unsworn testimony of a child.
MAY NOT
343.1. Rules of evidence; testimony given by children.*
A child witness may give testimony provided such child is considered vulnerable pursuant to CPL 65.10(1), which states a child witness is a person ___________ old or less who will be called to testify in a proceeding concerning acts of sex offenses or incest
FOURTEEN (14) YEARS
343.2. Rules of evidence; corroboration of accomplice testimony.*
A respondent (MAY/MAY NOT) be found delinquent SOLELY upon the testimony of an __________ that is not corroborated.
There (MAY/ MUST) be corroborating evidence which links the respondent to the crime.
MAY NOT…. accomplice…. MUST
343.3 “Identification by means of previous recognition in absence of present identification.
Paragraph 1:
- Topic sentence: This paragraph defines the circumstances under which a witness may testify about an identification made in the absence of present identification.
Supporting points:
- The witness must have observed the person they are identifying at the time and place of the crime, or on some other occasion relevant to the case.
- The witness must have observed the person they are identifying on a subsequent occasion, under circumstances consistent with the rights of the accused.
The witness must be unable to state, on the basis of present recollection, whether or not the person they are identifying is the person in question. - It must be established that the person the witness is identifying is in fact the person who committed the crime.
Paragraph 2:
- Topic sentence: This paragraph states that, if the conditions in paragraph 1 are met, the witness may testify that the person they identified is the same person who committed the crime.
- Supporting points: The testimony of the witness, together with the evidence that the person they identified is in fact the person who committed the crime, constitutes evidence in chief.
- The term “blind or blinded procedure” refers to a method of identification in which the public servant administering the array is not told which person in the array is the suspect. This is done to prevent the witness from being influenced by the order of the array or by any other factors that might bias their identification.
- The failure of a public servant to follow a blind or blinded procedure may result in the preclusion of testimony regarding the identification procedure as evidence in chief. However, this does not mean that the evidence is inadmissible
Subtopic 1: Conditions for admissibility
- The witness must have observed the person they are identifying at the time and place of the crime, or on some other occasion relevant to the case.
- The witness must have observed the person they are identifying on a subsequent occasion, under circumstances consistent with the rights of the accused.
- The witness must be unable to state, on the basis of present recollection, whether or not the person they are identifying is the person in question.
- It must be established that the person the witness is identifying is in fact the person who committed the crime.
Subtopic 2: Admissible evidence
- The testimony of the witness, together with the evidence that the person they identified is in fact the person who committed the crime, constitutes evidence in chief.]
Paragraph 1:
Topic sentence: This paragraph defines the circumstances under which a witness may testify about an identification made in the absence of present identification.
Supporting points:
The witness must have observed the person they are identifying at the time and place of the crime, or on some other occasion relevant to the case.
The witness must have observed the person they are identifying on a subsequent occasion, under circumstances consistent with the rights of the accused.
The witness must be unable to state, on the basis of present recollection, whether or not the person they are identifying is the person in question.
It must be established that the person the witness is identifying is in fact the person who committed the crime.
Paragraph 2:
Topic sentence: This paragraph states that, if the conditions in paragraph 1 are met, the witness may testify that the person they identified is the same person who committed the crime.
Supporting points:
The testimony of the witness, together with the evidence that the person they identified is in fact the person who committed the crime, constitutes evidence in chief.
The term “blind or blinded procedure” refers to a method of identification in which the public servant administering the array is not told which person in the array is the suspect. This is done to prevent the witness from being influenced by the order of the array or by any other factors that might bias their identification.
The failure of a public servant to follow a blind or blinded procedure may result in the preclusion of testimony regarding the identification procedure as evidence in chief. However, this does not mean that the evidence is inadmissible
Subtopic 1: Conditions for admissibility
The witness must have observed the person they are identifying at the time and place of the crime, or on some other occasion relevant to the case.
The witness must have observed the person they are identifying on a subsequent occasion, under circumstances consistent with the rights of the accused.
The witness must be unable to state, on the basis of present recollection, whether or not the person they are identifying is the person in question.
It must be established that the person the witness is identifying is in fact the person who committed the crime.
Subtopic 2: Admissible evidence
The testimony of the witness, together with the evidence that the person they identified is in fact the person who committed the crime, constitutes evidence in chief.]
§ 343.4. Rules of evidence; identification by means of previous recognition, in addition to present identification.
[BARD:
- In a juvenile delinquency proceeding, a witness who testifies that they saw the person who is accused of the crime either at the time of the crime or on another occasion related to the case, and
- The witness can identify the person as the person who committed the crime based on their current memory, and
- The witness saw the person again on a later occasion, or saw a lineup of people that included the person, and was able to identify the person as the person who committed the crime,
- Then the witness can testify about their previous identification of the person and that the person they saw on the later occasion or in the lineup is the same person who committed the crime:
- Such testimony and such pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction constitutes evidence in chief
[BARD:
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding, a witness who testifies that they saw the person who is accused of the crime either at the time of the crime or on another occasion related to the case, and
The witness can identify the person as the person who committed the crime based on their current memory, and
The witness saw the person again on a later occasion, or saw a lineup of people that included the person, and was able to identify the person as the person who committed the crime,
Then the witness can testify about their previous identification of the person and that the person they saw on the later occasion or in the lineup is the same person who committed the crime.
Such testimony and such pictorial, photographic, electronic, filmed or video recorded reproduction constitutes evidence in chief
§ 343.5. Rules of evidence; impeachment of own witness by proof of prior contradictory statement.
[Bard
Paragraph 1
- When a witness called by a party gives testimony that tends to disprove the position of the party, the party may introduce evidence that the witness has previously made a contradictory statement.
- The contradictory statement can be either a written statement signed by the witness or an oral statement under oath.
- The contradictory statement can be introduced for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of the witness.
Paragraph 2
- Evidence of a prior contradictory statement is only admissible for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of the witness.
- Evidence of a prior contradictory statement cannot be used as evidence in chief.
Paragraph 3
- When a witness has made a prior contradictory statement, but the witness’s testimony does not tend to disprove the position of the party who called the witness, evidence of the prior contradictory statement is not admissible.
- The party who called the witness cannot use the prior contradictory statement to refresh the witness’s recollection in a manner that discloses its contents to the court.]
[Bard
Paragraph 1
When a witness called by a party gives testimony that tends to disprove the position of the party, the party may introduce evidence that the witness has previously made a contradictory statement.
The contradictory statement can be either a written statement signed by the witness or an oral statement under oath.
The contradictory statement can be introduced for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of the witness.
Paragraph 2
Evidence of a prior contradictory statement is only admissible for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of the witness.
Evidence of a prior contradictory statement cannot be used as evidence in chief.
Paragraph 3
When a witness has made a prior contradictory statement, but the witness’s testimony does not tend to disprove the position of the party who called the witness, evidence of the prior contradictory statement is not admissible.
The party who called the witness cannot use the prior contradictory statement to refresh the witness’s recollection in a manner that discloses its contents to the court.]
§ 344.1. Rules of evidence; proof of previous conviction or delinquency finding.
- If a witness in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is asked if they have been convicted of a crime and they answer no or in a way that is unclear, the other party can prove that they have been convicted.
- If a respondent in a juvenile delinquency proceeding tries to show that they have good character by calling a witness, the presentment agency can prove any previous findings of delinquency that would contradict the witness’ testimony.
Paragraph 1
Introduction: If a witness in a juvenile delinquency proceeding is asked if they have been convicted of a crime and they answer no or in a way that is unclear, the other party can prove that they have been convicted.
Body: This is also true if the witness is asked if they have ever been convicted of any crime and they answer no or in a way that is unclear.
Conclusion: The other party can prove that the witness has been convicted of a crime even if the witness denies it.
Paragraph 2
Introduction: If a respondent in a juvenile delinquency proceeding tries to show that they have good character by calling a witness, the presentment agency can prove any previous findings of delinquency that would contradict the witness’ testimony.
Body: The presentment agency can prove any previous findings of delinquency that would contradict the witness’ testimony.
Conclusion: The presentment agency can use this evidence to show that the respondent does not have good character.
§ 344.2. Rules of evidence; statements of respondent; corroboration.
[BARD
1. A juvenile’s _______________ cannot be used as evidence in a delinquency proceeding if it was obtained ___________.
- A confession is considered involuntary if it was obtained through:
- Physical force or threats of physical force
- Improper conduct or undue pressure that impaired the juvenile’s ability to make a choice about whether to confess
- A promise or statement of fact that created a substantial risk that the juvenile would falsely incriminate himself
- A violation of the juvenile’s constitutional rights
- A violation of section 305.2 of the law, which details a peace officer or police officer detaining a juvenile without a warrant
- If a juvenile is interrogated by a public servant at a facility specified in section 305.2, the entire interrogation must be recorded.
- The recording must be clear and identify the people involved.
- A copy of the recording must be made available to the juvenile and his lawyer.
- A juvenile cannot be found delinquent based solely on his confession. There must also be other evidence that the crime was committed.]
confession…………. involuntarily