Final Flashcards
Type of questions asked in comparative politics
Cause-effect; why
Empirical
Ask and explain why the world is the way it is
Normative
How the world ought to be
Concepts
Abstract ideas we use to think about the phenomena, facts and processes we study
Good concepts are
Clear, coherent, consistent, useful
Conceptualization
Process of creating and selecting social science concepts we want to use
Operationalization
Process of making basic concepts measurable
Challenges of measurement
Validity- extent that a measure captures what we are researching
Reliability- extent that a measure produces consistent results
Theory
Explanation for political phenomena
Hypothesis
Specific and empirically testable prediction that is often derived from a theory
Empirical evidence
Facts supporting an argument
Correlation
Relationship between two variables in which they tend to move in a predictable relationship to one another
Causation
Relationship between two variables in which change in one variable causes change in another
Comparative politics
Su field of political science that explains political phenomena using the comparative method
Omitted variable
Z–>X & Z–>Y
Reverse causation
X
Endogeneity
XY
Intervening variable
X–>Z–>Y
Spurious correlation
X?Y
Empirical critique
Identifying evidence that does not support a given theory–deviant cases
Theoretical critique
Showing logical limitations
The comparative method
Examine cases, look at how variables interact, focus on causal relations
Most similar system design
Similar case, different outcomes
Most different system design
Different cases, same outcome