Final Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

Criteria for involuntary hospitalization (commitment) - AZ

A
  • Dangerousness to self
  • Dangerousness to others
  • Persistently or acutely disabled
  • Gravely disabled
  • Danger posed must be imminent
  • Not due to alchohol/drug abuse only; must be due to psychiatric disorder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Process of involuntary commitment (hospitalization)

A

-72 hr. emergency hospitalization for observation & evaluation (COE = court ordered evaluation)
-Patient evaluated by 2 independent psychiatrists
-Public hearing before judge
*patient has a right to legal representation, to call & question witnesses & to appeal
ruling
*clear and convincing evidence” (that person requires treatment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 possible outcomes of involuntary commitment

A
  1. Released
  2. Offered treatment; change to voluntary status
  3. Petitioned to receive court ordered treatment *COT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Civil commitment

A

Involuntary hospitalization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What rights does a person who is civilly committed have?

A
  • Patients retain some civil rights when involuntarily committed
  • Right to treatment (ie. not warehoused, humane environment, sufficient qualified staff, individualized treatment plans, minimize restrictions
  • Right to least restrictive environment (e.g. outpatient, inpatient, combination of in/out patient)
  • Treatment must be time limited (90, 180, or 365 days) - must petition for additional time
  • Right to refuse treatment (informed consent required; waived if patient is DTS (danger to self), DTO (danger to others), psychotic, ect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mens rea

A

Able to form intent (in order to commit, you must have mens rea)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Incompetence to stand trial

A

Individual who doesn’t understand what is happening to them in a court room & who cannot participate in their own defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 possible outcomes after evaluation for competency to stand trial

A
  1. Competent to stand trial
  2. Incompetent & restorable
  3. Incompetent & not restorable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If competent to stand trial then…

A

Trial continues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If incompetent and restorable then…

A

Patient sent to Correctional Health Services Restoration & Competency program for treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If incompetent and not restorable then…

A

Charges dropped. However, person may meet criteria for civil committment (24-48 hrs to file)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

M’Naghton Rule (1843)

A

@ the time of the crime, individual was affected by a disease of the mind that he/she did no know the nature of the act s/he was committing or did now know it was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Irresistible Impulse Rule (1934)

A

At the time of crime, individual was driven by an Irresistible Impulse to perform the act or had a diminished capacity to resist performing the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Durham Rule (1954)

A

The crime was a product of mental disease or defect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

American Legal Institute (ALI) Rule (1962)

A

@ the time of crime, as a result of mental disease or mental retardation, the person lacked substantial capacity to either:

  1. Appreciate the wrongfulness of the act
  2. Conform his/her conduct to law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Insanity Defense Reform Act (1984)

A

@ the time of the crime, as a result of mental disease or mental retardation, ther person was unable to appreciat the worngfulness of his/her conduct (used by Fed. Gov’t & many states)

Also, burden of proof rests on defense