Financial Management Flashcards
(209 cards)
Which one of the following statements concerning cash flow determination for capital budgeting purposes is incorrect?
A. Tax depreciation must be considered since it affects cash payments for taxes.
B. Book depreciation is relevant since it affects net income.
C. Sunk costs are not incremental flows and should not be included.
D. Net working capital changes should be included in cash flow forecasts.
B. Book depreciation is relevant since it affects net income.
Depreciation itself is not a cash outflow. Depreciation is relevant for capital budgeting purposes only because it affects the income upon which taxes must be assessed. Taxes are a cash outflow. Therefore, only tax depreciation is relevant. Book depreciation is not relevant despite its effect on net income.
To determine the inventory reorder point, calculations normally include the:
A. ordering cost.
B. carrying cost.
C. average daily usage.
D. economic order quantity.
C. average daily usage.
The reorder point (RP) is the inventory level at which an order is placed. The reorder point is average demand during the lead-time period plus any safety stock. Average daily usage is required to compute the demand during the lead-time, and so is needed to compute the reorder point.
The ordering cost and carrying cost are used to compute the best quantity to order, but not the reorder point. The economic order quantity (EOQ) is the quantity of inventory that should be ordered at one time in order to minimize the associated costs of carrying and ordering inventory, such as purchase-order processing, transportation, and insurance.
Sylvan Corporation has the following capital structure.
Debenture bonds $10,000,000
Preferred equity 1,000,000
Common equity 39,000,000
The financial leverage of Sylvan Corporation would increase as a result of:
A. issuing common stock and using the proceeds to retire preferred stock.
B. issuing common stock and using the proceeds to retire debenture bonds.
C. financing its future investments with a higher percentage of bonds.
D. financing its future investments with a higher percentage of equity funds.
C. financing its future investments with a higher percentage of bonds.
Leverage refers to the amount of debt in the firm’s capital structure. Of the financial instruments mentioned, only debenture bonds are considered to be debt. Both common and preferred stock are considered equity, even though preferred stock may pay a fixed dividend.
A small vacuum cleaner repair shop is located in a once-quiet, out-of-the way neighborhood. Recently, however, a large entertainment complex that will be used for concerts, basketball games, and other major events was just opened a block from this small business. When determining the fair value of this property, the fair value should be based upon:
A. the use of the property as a small vacuum cleaner repair shop.
B. the use of the property as a small restaurant serving a variety of light meals, exotic desserts, and alcohol.
C. the use of the property as a small restaurant serving a variety of light meals, exotic desserts, and alcohol only if the current owner plans to sell the property.
D. the average of the property value based upon its current use and the highest and best use.
B. the use of the property as a small restaurant serving a variety of light meals, exotic desserts, and alcohol.
FASB ASC 820 provides guidance when determining the fair value of an asset or business ownership. The fair value measurement assumes that the business (or item) being valued will be put to the highest and best use that is physically possible, legally permissible, and financially feasible. The result will be the maximization of value. It is important to realize that the highest and best use may not be the current use; therefore, the highest and best use is determined from the viewpoint of the purchaser and not the seller.
In this scenario, the use of the facility as a vacuum cleaner repair shop is clearly not the highest and best use of the property. Due to the need to have small restaurants and bars in the vicinity of a large entertainment complex, the highest and best use of the property would likely be an establishment such as a small restaurant serving light fare for the before-the-event crowd and desserts for the after-the-event group.
Which of the following is an advantage of net present value modeling?
A. It is measured in time, not dollars.
B. It uses the accrual basis, not the cash basis of accounting for a project.
C. It uses the accounting rate of return.
D. It accounts for compounding of returns.
D. It accounts for compounding of returns.
Advantages of using the net present value method for decision making include the following:
The time value of money is considered (compounding of returns).
Given a perfect market, correct decision advice will be obtained.
A correct ranking will be obtained for mutually exclusive projects given similar lives and investments.
An absolute value is obtained.
Disadvantages of using the net present value method for decision making include the following:
The discount rate is difficult to determine.
Assumptions related to cash flows have to be made that may or may not be correct.
The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) has developed a widely accepted and used framework for internal control that was designed to provide reasonable assurance for a company’s objectives related to all items except:
A. effectiveness and efficiency of operations.
B. reliability of financial reporting.
C. expansion of markets.
D. compliance with laws and regulations
C. expansion of markets.
COSO has developed a widely accepted and used framework for internal control that was designed to provide reasonable assurance for a firm’s objects related to: effectiveness and efficiency of operations, reliability of financial reporting, and compliance with laws and regulations.
Although the expansion of markets may be in the strategic plan for a company and may come about due to the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, it is not a focus of the COSO Framework designed for internal control.
The gross margin ratio can be subjected to detailed analysis by a firm’s:
A. creditors.
B. customers.
C. investors.
D. management.
D. management.
Sales = Unit Price x Number of Units
COGS = Unit Cost x Number of Units
Gross Margin = (Unit Price - Unit Cost) x Number of Units
The above detailed information is available only to the firm’s management.
Thus, a detailed analysis could not be performed by the other parties mentioned.
The payback reciprocal can be used to approximate a project’s:
A. net present value.
B. accounting rate of return if the cash flow pattern is relatively stable.
C. payback period.
D. internal rate of return if the cash flow pattern is relatively stable.
D. internal rate of return if the cash flow pattern is relatively stable.
Payback reciprocal = 1/Payback period
Where: Payback = Net cash invested/Annual cash inflow
If the cash flow pattern is relatively stable, the payback reciprocal number serves as a good approximation of a present value of an annuity table factor. Using the payback number and a PV of an Annuity table, it becomes a relatively simple matter to look up an interest rate corresponding to the appropriate number of years’ life of a project. This interest rate will be a close approximation of the internal rate of return.
A company’s internal controls are established to provide protection for the company’s assets as well as to detect fraud. An internal control allows for the firm’s resources to be all of the following except:
A. monitored.
B. designed.
C. properly used.
D. measured.
B. designed.
A financial transaction control is a procedure that is developed to discover and/or prevent errors, misappropriations, or policy noncompliance in a financial transaction process. Such a control will aid an organization in achieving specific goals and objectives. It is an internal control that allows for a firm’s resources to be properly: used, monitored, and measured.
It is hoped that such controls will detect fraud and provide adequate protection for the company’s assets.
The working capital financing policy that subjects the firm to the greatest risk of being unable to meet the firm’s maturing obligations is the policy that finances:
A. fluctuating current assets with long-term debt.
B. permanent current assets with long-term debt.
C. permanent current assets with short-term debt.
D. fluctuating current assets with short-term debt.
C. permanent current assets with short-term debt.
Of the possible solutions offered, financing permanent current assets with short-term debt places a firm at the greatest risk because of its possible inability to meet its maturing obligations as economic conditions change, forcing the firm to respond to unfavorable refinancing situations to replace the short-term debt.
What is an internal rate of return?
A. A net present value
B. An accounting rate of return
C. A payback period expected from an investment
D. A time-adjusted rate of return from an investment
D. A time-adjusted rate of return from an investment
The internal rate of return (IRR) can be referred to as the yield (return) expected over the life of a project. It is computed by equating the initial investment with the present value of the cash flows over the life of the project. IRR is the discount rate that results in the net present value of all cash flows equal to zero. Due to the fact that present values of all cash flows are used in the determination of IRR, it is a time-adjusted rate of return related to the project being considered.
All of the following about the economic order quantity (EOQ) model are true, except:
A. the EOQ model is designed to determine an optimal order size that will minimize inventory costs.
B. the use of a just-in-time inventory system makes the EOQ model irrelevant.
C. the values in the EOQ model cannot remain constant for any material length of time during a period of inflation.
D. the reorder quantity determined using the EOQ model is best for companies requiring flexibility.
D. the reorder quantity determined using the EOQ model is best for companies requiring flexibility.
The EOQ model determines a particular reorder quantity. However, some companies require a great deal of flexibility in taking advantage of an opportunity to stockpile inventory before a price increase or as a protection against shortages. Although the EOQ model provides valuable information in regard to the optimal reorder quantity, it does not give management flexibility.
Since the just-in-time inventory system does not require inventory, this inventory system makes the EOQ model irrelevant.
Net present value as used in investment decision-making is stated in terms of which of the following options?
A. Net income
B. Earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation
C. Earnings before interest and taxes
D. Cash flow
D. Cash flow
The net present value determines whether the present value of the estimated net future cash inflows at a desired rate of return will be greater or less than the cost of the proposed investment. Using this method, the present value of the net cash inflows is calculated and compared to the initial investment. An investment proposal is desirable if the net present value is positive.
The other answer choices are incorrect because the net present value method uses cash flows, not net income or earnings before interest, taxes, or depreciation.
The market approach is one of the three basic methodologies available to the valuator. When determining whether this approach can be employed in a particular engagement (whether guideline companies are available), the valuator must keep all of the following in mind except:
A. the normalized statements of the subject of the valuation need to use similar GAAP choices, such as LIFO and FIFO, as the guideline companies.
B. one company does not make a comparable.
C. the guideline companies will need to be identical to the subject of the valuation.
D. a guideline company needs to produce (supply) similar products, serve similar markets, and be within a similar size range as the subject company.
C. the guideline companies will need to be identical to the subject of the valuation.
Finding guideline companies when performing a business valuation is often difficult. When developing a list of potential guideline companies, the business valuator assesses items such as whether the potential guideline company:
uses similar GAAP choices as the subject company.
has a similar product diversification as the subject company.
serves similar markets as the subject company.
has a similar geographic diversification as the subject company.
is of a similar size as the subject company.
has similar financial and operating leverage as the subject company.
has similar liquidity, solvency, growth, and profitability as the subject company.
It is important to note that a business valuation cannot be based upon one guideline organization, nor is a comparable expected to be identical to the subject of the valuation in any manner.
The market approach to determining the fair value of a small company is based upon the theory that:
A. an organization with newer assets will be worth more than one with older and possibly obsolete assets.
B. an investor will require that an investment will not only cover the cost of the initial investment but also provide a return necessary to compensate for the riskiness of that investment.
C. companies within the industry that have similar performance records and structure will have similar value.
D. the economic substitution principle provides a basis to develop a value that takes into consideration the functional obsolescence and physical deterioration of the assets employed in the company.
C. companies within the industry that have similar performance records and structure will have similar value.
There are three basic valuation approaches:
The cost approach, the market approach and the income approach
The market approach to determining fair value uses market comparisons of identical or comparable items. A comparable item is one that has reasonable and justifiable similarity to the item being valued, be that a single asset or an entire business.
The cost approach to determining fair value is an example of the economic substitution principle. In other words, what would it cost to replace the item in question with an asset of like function and capacity?
The income approach to determining fair value focuses on the company’s ability to create earnings or some other benefit stream, such as cash inflows, and the risk related to that investment. An investor will approach any investment from the perspective of the expected future benefit streams, and the requirement that those future benefit streams need to cover not only the cost of the initial investment but also a return commensurate with its risk.
In Belk Co.’s “just in time” production system, costs per setup were reduced from $28 to $2. In the process of reducing inventory levels, Belk found that there were fixed facility and administrative costs that previously had not been included in the carrying cost calculation. The result was an increase from $8 to $32 per unit per year. What were the effects of these changes on Belk’s economic lot size and relevant costs?
A. Lot size, decrease; Relevant Costs, increase
B. Lot size, increase; Relevant Costs, decrease
C. Lot size, increase; Relevant Costs, increase
D. Lot size, decrease; Relevant Costs, decrease
D. Lot size, decrease; Relevant Costs, decrease
Inventory decision models work with opposing costs. Carrying costs increase as the size of the order increases. Setup or ordering costs, however, decrease as the size of the production run or order increases.
Lower setup costs result in decreased lot sizes because it becomes less expensive to produce a smaller lot.
Increased carrying costs also result in decreased lot sizes because the greater the cost of carrying inventory, the fewer the units you will want to produce in a lot.
When performing a fair value valuation, John CPA has found a quoted market price for a similar asset to the one held by the reporting organization. There are some questions, however, related to the condition of the asset being valued in comparison to the similar asset. John should:
A. consider this a Level 1 fair value measurement since a current market price was available for an asset similar to the one being valued.
B. consider this a Level 2 fair value measurement since a current market price was available for an asset similar to the one being valued.
C. consider this a Level 3 fair value measurement if the potential adjustments necessary due to the condition of the assets being valued merit the classification of an unobservable input.
D. make all possible efforts to find another input that will be a closer comparison to the subject asset.
C. consider this a Level 3 fair value measurement if the potential adjustments necessary due to the condition of the assets being valued merit the classification of an unobservable input.
Per FASB ASC 820, there are three groups of inputs used when developing fair value:
Level 1: directly observable inputs of identical items, such as quoted active market prices
Level 2: directly or indirectly observable inputs of similar items
Level 3: unobservable inputs
In John’s valuation situation, the quoted market price is for the allegedly similar asset; therefore, this can be no more than a Level 2 fair value measurement. However, since there is a question as to the similarity of the conditions between the subject asset and the comparable, John will need to consider whether these questions related to the condition of the subject asset are significant enough to lower the fair value measurement to a Level 3.
Although FASB ASC 820 expects that the CPA will attempt to use more observable than unobservable inputs when doing a fair value valuation, it only requires the use of information that is available without undue cost or effort
The use of an accelerated method instead of the straight-line method of depreciation in computing the net present value of a project has the effect of:
A. raising the hurdle rate necessary to justify the project.
B. lowering the net present value of the project.
C. increasing the present value of the depreciation tax shield.
D. increasing the cash outflows at the initial point of the project.
C. increasing the present value of the depreciation tax shield.
Cash flows in the form of revenue are taxable so revenues must be computed net of tax. Cash outflows in the form of expenses are deductible in computing taxes payable. Therefore, these cash outflows must be computed net of tax also. Depreciation is not a cash flow but it is a deductible expense and therefore affects the amount of taxes payable. An accelerated method of depreciation will cause larger amounts of depreciation to be deducted sooner than straight-line. Although the same amount of tax will be shielded in nominal dollars, the present value of the tax savings (or shield) is greater under accelerated depreciation because less tax is paid out earlier in the project’s life.
A firm that often factors its accounts receivable has an agreement with its finance company that requires the firm to maintain a 6% reserve and charges 1% commission on the amount of receivables. The net proceeds would be further reduced by an annual interest charge of 10%. Assuming a 360-day year, what amount of cash (rounded to the nearest dollar) will the firm receive from the finance company at the time a $100,000 account that is due in 90 days is turned over to the finance company?
A. $93,000
B. $90,000
C. $83,000
D. $90,675
D. $90,675=(100,000-(6%+1%100,000)-((10%93000)*(90/360))
Factoring involves the sale of accounts receivable as a way for the seller to obtain financing. However, the seller receives an amount less than the face amount of the accounts sold to compensate the factor for assuming the risk and the costs of collection. In this case, the amount of cash the seller will receive from the finance company is $90,675, computed as follows:
Face amount of accounts receivable factored = $100,000
LESS: 6% reserve = .06 x $100,000 = $6,000
1% commission = .01 x $100,000 = $1,000 7,000
Net amount available $ 93,000
LESS: 10% interest = .10 x $93,000 x (90 / 360) = 2,325
Cash proceeds $ 90,675
Joe CPA has been retained to determine the fair value of the capital assets of the warehousing division of the Trinket Company. In doing so, Joe will assume that:
A. the potential market participants were obligated to complete the hypothetical sale of the capital assets.
B. all market activities related to the hypothetical sale of the capital assets took place on a specific measurement date.
C. the hypothetical sale occurred in an orderly fashion.
D. there was no principal market for the hypothetical sale of the capital assets.
C. the hypothetical sale occurred in an orderly fashion.
The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In determining the price under this fair value assumption, it is assumed that the hypothetical sale occurs in an orderly fashion and not under distress or due to liquidation. In other words, the seller would have the ability to take advantage of what would be considered to be normal market activities resulting from taking advantage of all normal market exposure activities prior to the measurement date.
Another important aspect of the fair value assumptions as presented in FASB ASC 820 assumes that the hypothetical transaction is considered to have occurred in the principal market for such a transaction. In the absence of a principal market, the transaction is considered to have occurred in the most advantageous market. These markets are defined from the current holder’s perspective.
The hypothetical seller and buyer would:
not be related parties.
both be knowledgeable about the item(s) involved in the hypothetical transaction.
both have the ability to complete the hypothetical transaction.
both be willing to complete the hypothetical transaction, but not be forced to do so.
The Frame Supply Company has just acquired a large account and needs to increase its working capital by $100,000. The controller of the company has identified four alternative sources of funds, which are given as follows.
Pay a factor to buy the company’s receivables, which average $125,000 per month and have an average collection period of 30 days. The factor will advance up to 80% of the face value of receivables at 10% and charge a fee of 2% on all receivables purchased. The controller estimates that the firm would save $24,000 in collection expense over the year. Assume that the fee and interest are not deductible in advance.
Borrow $110,000 from a bank at 12% interest. A 9% compensating balance would be required.
Issue $110,000 of 6-month commercial paper to net $100,000. (New paper would be issued every six months.)
Borrow $125,000 from a bank on a discount basis at 20%. No compensating balance would be required.
Assume a 360-day year on all of your calculations.
The cost of Alternative 1 is:
A. 10.0%.
B. 12.0%.
C. 14.8%.
D. 16.0%.
Annual Cost:
Interest on average balance
($100,000 x .10 rate) $10,000
Fee payable to factor
(2% of purchased receivables) 30,000
(.02 x $125,000 x 12 mo.)
= $40,000
Less savings on collection expense (24,000)
Net Cost $16,000
Cost as a % = $16,000 / $100,000 = 16%
The difference between the amount advanced and the receivable is not a cost of financing as that amount will be collected and returned to the company. If any amount is not collected, then it would be written off as bad debt.·
A company can finance an equipment purchase through a loan. Alternatively, it often can obtain the same equipment through a lease arrangement. A factor that would not be considered when comparing the lease financing with the loan financing is:
A. whether the lessor has a higher cost of capital than the lessee.
B. whether the lessor and lessee have different tax reduction opportunities.
C. the residual value of the property.
D. the capacity of the equipment.
D. the capacity of the equipment.
The financing of the equipment by either lease or loan will not affect the physical output, or capacity, that the equipment has the ability to generate. The equipment will utilize the same capacity regardless of the means by which it is financed.
Neu Co. is considering the purchase of an investment that has a positive net present value based on Neu’s 12% hurdle rate. The internal rate of return would be:
A. 0.
B. 12%.
C. greater than 12%.
D. less than 12%.
C. greater than 12%.
Consider the relationship:
Present value of cash inflows $XXX
Less present value of cash outflows XX
Net present value $ XX
If the internal rate of return is equal to the hurdle rate, no “excess return” will occur so net present value will be zero.
A positive net present value indicates that the internal rate of return exceeds the hurdle rate. Thus, for the proposed Neu Co. project the internal rate of return (IRR) is greater than 12%.
The hurdle rate is simply the cost of capital or cost of borrowing for Neu Co.
A ratio that examines the percentage change in earnings available to common stockholders that is associated with a given percentage change in earnings before interest and taxes is a measure of:
A. the degree of operating leverage.
B. the degree of financial leverage.
C. return on investment.
D. return on equity.
B. the degree of financial leverage.
This ratio basically compares the change in earnings after interest and taxes to the change in earnings before interest and taxes. The higher this ratio, the greater the return available to companies who finance their asset purchases with debt.