FMS Injury prevention and performance Flashcards
(13 cards)
What is the relationship to score on injury risk?
Increase risk of injury for lower than 14
Decrease risk of injury for 14 or higher
Validity of cut-off point questioned
Effective assessment of injury risk
Ability to predict injury
Designing intervention programmes
Measure efficiency of the FMS
Determine those at risk
What are the preferred statistics to use to assess validity?
Sensitivity and specificity
Likewise Validity should be the same test every time
What is sensitivity?
Correct identification of those with risk and who attain injury
100% (1.0) means correctly identifies all subject predisposed to injury and who sustain an injury
What is specificity?
Correctly identify those subjects without an injury risk and who do not incur an injury
What is the FMS Relationship with performance?
Specific Movement and balance deficits
Mobility and stability needs
FMS relationship with performance
No significant relationship between FMS and Active performance
Significant relationship between 1RM and active performance
FMS relationship with performance
Core stability, FMS and performance tests
Core and FMS - no relationship
FMS and performance tests - Significant relationship
Case study American football intervention 7 weeks
Focus on
mobility
selfmyofascial release
Corrective Exercise
11% increase in FMS scores
Decrease in asymmetries
Better results in the Intervention group
pre - 13.2
Post 15.3
Control group
Pre - 13.2
Post - 13.3
Does FMS training improve functional capacity?
Improvements in overall score
Correction of dysfunctions
Intervention overview
FMS interventions improve overall score in athletes and occupational groups
Corrective exercise programs reduce risk of injury
Participants will gain from supervised sessions
