FORMULATING HYPOTHESIS Flashcards

1
Q

must be a controlled procedure

A

INTERNAL VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

presence vs absence
amount or degree
category

A

LEVEL OF IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CONFOUNDING

A

problem if there is no random assignment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

observable operation, procedures, measurements in context of an experiment.

A

OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION

A

definition of the cited info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explains the precise meaning of IV; describe exactly what was done to create various treatment conditions of experiment.

A

EXPERIMENTAL OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

unseen processes to explain behavior; provided definitions involving variables that can be observed.

A

HYPOTHETICAL CONSTRUCTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

agreement between measurements of same responses from different observers.

A

INTERRATER RELIABITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

comparison of scores who have been measured twice with the same instrument.

A

TEST - RETEST REALIABITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

measures internal consistency; measures single construct variable

A

INTERITEM RELIABILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

actually studying the variables that we intend to study.

A

VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

provides evidence to validity of an experimental procedure

A

MANIPULATION CHECK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

measure what it intends to measure

A

FACE VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how content of our measure fairly reflect the content of the quality we are measuring

A

CONTENT VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ability of the instrument to predict future behavior based on the score they obtained.

A

PREDICTIVE VALIDITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

whether scores on a measuring device correlate with scores obtained from another method.

A

CONCURRENT VALIDITY

17
Q

transition from theory to research application

A

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY

18
Q

test result should highly correlate with scores on tests measuring same construct

A

CONVERGENT VALIDITY

19
Q

test result should not highly correlate with scores on tests measuring other constructs.

A

DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY

20
Q

type of prob in internal validity wherein factors that are note the focus of the expe can influence the findings?

A

EXGTRANEOUS VARIABLES

21
Q

type of prob in internal validity wherein it sabotages an experiment, ext. variable changes systematically across diff conditions of expe

A

CONFOUNDING

22
Q

proposed by Donald Campbell; all quasi-experimental studies contain one or more classic threats

A

CLASSIC THREATS TO INTERNAL VALIDITY

23
Q

type of threat where it involves an outside event that happened before the experimentation; which can cause the experimental effects.

A

HISTORY

24
Q

internal changes in subjects; studies that take months/ yrs to finish

A

MATURATION

25
Q

effects on the DV produced by previous administration of the same test/ other measuring instrument.

A

TESTING

26
Q

type of threat that happens when some features of the measuring instrument changes during experiment

A

INTRUMENTATION

27
Q

regression towards the mean; extreme scores tend to have lest test - retest reliability; issue w/ d result

A

STATISTICAL REGRESSION

28
Q

type of threat where researchers does not assign subjects randomly to diff conditions of the experiment.

A

SELECTION

29
Q

happens when occurence of subjs dropping out of the experiment.

A

SUBJECT MORTALITY

30
Q

occurs when selection threat combines with another threat

A

SELECTION INTERACTION