Gender and Crime (2 - female crime) Flashcards
(46 cards)
What are the three main explanations about why women commit less crime?
- sex role theory
- control theory
- liberation thesis
Functionalist Sex Role Theory: what were the early assumptions made by this theory?
- differences in socialisation
- boys are taught to be tough, aggressive and risk-taking which means they want to prove themselves to peers and feel they need to provide through any means
Functionalist Sex Role Theory: how does Parsons trace differences in crime and how does he explain this?
- traces differences to the gender roles in the nuclear family
- men were breadwinners outside the home
- women were in the home taking a socialising role
- girls therefore had an accessible role model whereas boys rejected feminine behaviour eg. showing tenderness/ emotion
- boys sought to distance themselves from this role model and engaged in ‘compensatory compulsory masculinity’ eg. aggression and antisocial behaviour possibly leading to delinquency
How does Cohen explain boys turning to male street gangs?
- men have much less of a socialising role and so boys find socialisation more difficult
- lack of adult male role models mean boys turn to street gangs as a source of masculine identity - status is earned by toughness, risk-taking and delinquency
How does Walklate criticise Sex Role Theory?
- criticises for biological assumptions
- Parsons assumes because women can have children they are best suited to an expressive role
List some other criticisms of Sex Role Theory
- there are a lot of terrible mothers
- lots of good single fathers
- lots of women who don’t want children
- stereotypes are changing - not all boys are encouraged to be tough etc
What are the two main feminist approaches?
- control theory
- liberation thesis
What does Heidensohn observe about female behaviour/ crime?
- behaviour is very conformist
- they commit fewer crimes and less serious crimes than men
How does control theory explain that women commit fewer crimes?
- patriarchal society imposes greater control over women which reduces their opportunities to offend
- eg. not many crimes can be committed from inside the home
- women are told where they can go at certain times etc.
How does control theory explain that women are controlled at home?
- women’s domestic role has constant demands of housework/ childcare which imposes severe restrictions on women’s time + movement
How do Dobash and Dobash argue that when women try to reject the patriarchal control they it is inflicted on them?
- much domestic abuse results from men’s dissatisfaction with wives’ domestic performance
- men also control the household budget and deny women the funds for leisure outside the home
How are daughters subjected to patriarchal control and so limited from committing crime?
- can’t come and go as they like/ stay out late
- they develop a ‘bedroom’ culture where they socialise at home
- girls do more housework so have less time to be deviant
How does control theory explain that women are controlled in public?
- fear of male violence against them
- the media sensationalises rape cases and distorts the typical rapist as a stranger who carries out random attacks which frightens women into staying indoors
- women also may not go to places like bars that would provide opportunities for crime due to fear of being seen as sexually loose
How does control theory explain that women are controlled at work?
- sexual harassment is common and keeps women ‘in their place’
- women’s subordinate position reduces their opportunity to engage in major criminal activity at work (‘glass ceiling’ prevents women rising to senior positions where there is more opportunity for crime)
How does control theory also acknowledge that some women can actually be pushed to crime due to patriarchal control?
- women are more likely to be poor due to inequalities in labour market so may turn to theft/ prostitution to make ends meet
What did Carlen study?
- 39 15-46 year old working class women convicted of a range of crimes
Carlen builds on Hirschi’s study - what did Hirschi say?
- humans act rationally and are controlled by being offered a ‘deal’ which rewards them for conforming to social norms
What are the two deals that Carlen believes working class women are generally conformist in the hope of gaining?
- the class deal
- the gender deal
Other than not being able to achieve these deals, what might also drive women to crime?
- rejecting these rewards
- eg. if they don’t want to work in an office or don’t want to have to rely on a man
How might working class women not be able to achieve the class deal and thus take the approach that they have nothing to lose by committing crime to get money?
- failed to find a legitimate way of earning a legitimate way of earning a decent wage and so left feeling powerless, oppressed and victims of injustice
- always been poor
- qualifications/ training courses in jail hadn’t helped them find work on release
- many had problems/ been humiliated when claiming benefits
How might working class women not be able to achieve the gender deal and thus take the approach that they have nothing to lose by committing crime to gain a decent living?
- hadn’t had the opportunity to make the deal or saw few advantages of having a family
- some abused by fathers/ suffered domestic violence
- half of the group had been in care so had few family bonds
- those who ran from care were often homeless, unemployed and poor
What conclusions did Carlen make about the class and gender deals?
- poverty and being in care/ oppressive family = main two causes of criminality
- being criminalised and jailed made class deal even less available and crime more attractive
Name the two criticisms of the control theory
- accused of seeing women’s behaviour as determined by external forces and underplays the importance of free will and choice in offending (lot of women are disadvantaged and don’t turn to crime)
- Carlen’s sample is small and may be unrepresentative - only working class women and serious offenders involved (middle class offenders likely have both deals so criminality must be due to other factors)
What is the logical assumption we can make if it is patriarchal control over women that stops them from deviating?
- if women are freer in the legitimate economy, they will become freer in the illegitimate economy
- ie. if society becomes less patriarchal and more equal, women’s crime rates will become similar to mens