geog book 4 chap 3 Flashcards
(64 cards)
what is a tectonic disaster risk?
refers to the potential damage to properties, injuries and loss of lives, from a disaster in a given period of time
determined as a product of the interaction between tectonic hazard, vulnerability and exposure to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions
what is tectonic disaster risk management
plans and actions that are put in place to
prevent disaster risks before the occurences of tectonic hazards
reduce disaster risks as TH occur
manage DR after TH
how does DRM prevent disaster risks before the occurences of TH
designing HRB ensures structures can withstand hazards and do not collapse easily preventing DR
give an example of how DRM prevent disaster risks before the occurences of TH
Taipei 101 is a skyscraper buily in EPZ
has a weighted damper near top of building to balance out ground shaking from earthquakes and reduces sway of building during an EQ and threat of collapse
how does DRM reduce DR as TH occur
tsunami and EQ early monitoring and warning systems enables timely evacuation and lesser loss of lives
how does DRM strengthen DR after occurences of TH
insurance coverage offers financial payouts to rebuild when properties are destroyed
enabling quick recovery from impacts of TH
strengthens resilience as it enables communities to resist, adapt and recover from TH in a timely and efficient manner
how does the environmental consequences of DR and losses hinder development?
TH can bury huge areas of forests and wetlands destroying ecosystems and loss of biodiversity
debris pollute rivers killing aquatic life
debris may block rivers causing floods that damage ecosystems
how does the social consequences of DR and losses hinder development?
TH can cause LoL as ppl drown or get hit by debris
people may become homeless as houses are destroyed
they are hence forced to live in temporary housing lacking proper sanitation causing poor standards of living
sea water brought inland by tsunamis contaminate wells and drinking sources causing pollution and spread of diseases
individuals may suffer trauma from loss of homes or loved ones
the constant threat of losing their lives can affect their mental health
how does the economic consequences of DR and losses hinder development?
damage to properties
people suffer financially as it is costly to rebuild damaged properties
business owners lose incomes due to damage of property
govts need to spend money to repair and rebuild
how does DR and losses hinder economic development?
countries need to channel money to rebuilding, development is slowed down as money is invested in other areas
efforts to reduce poverty may be affected as people live in poverty with poor standards of living when they lose income and homes due to DR
entire tourism industry may be affefted as damaged infrastructure and facilities may cause lesser revenue to people and govt
give an example of DR hindering economic growth
the 2004 indian ocean tsunami
increase in number of ppl living in poverty by 20% (30-50) in Aceh, Indonesia
many lost their jobs hindering development
why is it important to reduce disaster risks in disaster prone developing countriws
social, economic and environmental consequences can be severe hinding development
developing countries disproportionately affected by TH as they lack capacity to prevent reduce and manage DR
give an example of how DRM is important in disaster prone developing countries
Mw 7.0 Haiti Eq
most of city destroyed as it lacked finances to invest in ERB
causing 220000 deaths
Mw 9.0 Tohuku Eq
lower death toll of about 19000 with higher magnitude as they had ERB and a better economic position to recover due to available resources
how do some developing countries reduce DR through investment and planning + example
DRM is cost effective in preventing future losses contributing to sustainable development
additional investments to reduce DR are smaller than costs incurred from disaster
it lowers cost of rebuilding and threat to development gains
mw7.0 2010 chile eq
lesser buildings damaged and low death toll of 500
as they had modern ERB
how does the variation in duration of shaking determine the nature of hazard of EQ + example
longer duration -> more damage
as structures subjected to a long period of stress and are more lijelt to collapse
ppl will be more likely to be trapped in collapsed infrastructure increases injuries and loss of lives
mw 9.0 2011 tohuku eq lasted 9 mins causing significal dmg to buildings
how does the variation in time of shaking determine the nature of hazard of EQ + example
influences activities carried out by people and how they respond when eq strikes
at night ppl sleeping -> less alert -» unable to evacuate quickly
in the day time at work or school -> more alert -» evacuate quickly
mw 6.9 1995 kobe eq occured at 6am when ppl asleep and were trapped at home causing more than 6000 casualties
how does the quality of building design and construction of shaking determine the vulnerabme conditions of EQ
EQ doesnt kill people but rather the buildings and the contents of its collapse do
the poorer the quality of building design, more vulnerable the buildings are to collapsing causing more ppl to be trapped
- poorly built w low quality materials that are rigid and unable to withstand shaking
- do not follow building codes set by authorities
- lack ERF such as reinforced steel walls
give an example of how does the quality of building design and construction of shaking determine the vulnerabme conditions of EQ
mw 7.0 Haiti EQ 2010 port au prince
buildings collapsed
made of low quality materials and structures are poorly reinforced
>90% of buildings near to the epicentre were destroyed during EQ causing 220000 lives lost
how does the salt and rock properties determine the vulnerable conditions of EQ - loose soil
potentially open up to other EQH like soil liquefaction
when soils are saturated and loose shaking may result in liquefaction
buildings are more vulnerae to collapse as they sink into liquefied soil and tip over
people more likely trapped in collapsed buildings increasing injuries and loss of lives
how does the salt and rock properties determine the vulnerable conditions of EQ - soft soil
soft soil increases DR
as seismic waves travel from hard rocks to soft soil, waves get amplified
passing from rock to soil, waves slow down but become bigger
soft, loose soil shake more intensely than hard rock increasing likelihood of structures collapsing
people will more likely be tralled in buildings increasing injuries and loss of lives
give an example of how salt and rock properties determine the vulnerabme conditions of EQ - loose soil
large areas of PaP, Haiti lie on layers of relatively soft soil
when 2010 mw 7.0 haiti eq, seismic waves amplified
causing collapse of many buildings and more than 220000 casualties
how does variation population density determine exposure of a place to TH + example
higher the pd, higher no of ppl and buildings exposed to EQs
as when large numbers of people are located within buildings, more ppl will be trapped when buildings collapse increasing injuries and loss of lives
mw 6.9 1995 Kobe EQ
densely populated city
killed more than 6000 people and injuted 40000 ppl
pd: 3000ppl/km²
how does distance from epicentre influence exposure of communities to EQH + example
nearer the city to epicentre
> more no of ppl and buildings exposed to hazard increasing DR
> less energy absorbed by rocks before seismic waves reach city causing them to be stronger resulting in violent shaking
buildings and structures more likely to collapse causing more ppl trapped and higher no of casualties
mw7.0 2010 Haiti EQ: PaP
>220000 deaths as epicentre only 25km west frm city
how does the chemical composition if magma affect nature of eruption
determines effusive/ explosive
influences type of hazards occuring and extent of DR
low silica
- less viscous
- as magma rises to ES dissolved gases in magma can escape easily causing less pressure to build up -> gentle effusive eruptions
- dmg infrastructure over GR of volcano
- rarely kill ppl as ppl can avoid lava
high silica
- more viscous
- as magma rises to ES, dissolved gases in magma cannot escape easily
- more pressure builds up until gases escape explosively -> violent, explosive eruptions
- may form highly destructive pyroclastic flows causing widespread damage to infrastructure
- explosion of volcanic materials strike ppl and properties
- causing high injuries and casualties